Synlett 2021; 32(08): 817-821
DOI: 10.1055/a-1384-2931
letter

Glycosylation by Alkyne Activation of the 2-O-Substituted Propargyl Group in a β-Phenylthioglucoside with a 5 S 1 Conformation

a   Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 10, Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-0810, Japan
b   School of Science and Technology, Kwansei Gakuin University, 2-1, Gakuen, Sanda, 669-1337, Japan
,
Shintaro Matsumoto
b   School of Science and Technology, Kwansei Gakuin University, 2-1, Gakuen, Sanda, 669-1337, Japan
,
Daiki Ikuta
b   School of Science and Technology, Kwansei Gakuin University, 2-1, Gakuen, Sanda, 669-1337, Japan
,
b   School of Science and Technology, Kwansei Gakuin University, 2-1, Gakuen, Sanda, 669-1337, Japan
› Author Affiliations
JSPS KAKENHI (Grants Nos. JP16H01163 in Middle Molecular Strategy, JP16KT0061, and JP19K15549) partly supported this work.


Abstract

Generally, glycosylation reactions activate an anomeric substituent in a glycosyl donor to generate an oxocarbenium ion intermediate. Here we report a novel glycosylation reaction triggered by the activation of a 2-O-substituted propargyl group in a 3,6-O-1,1′-[(ethane-1,2-diyl)bibenzene-2,2′-bis(methylene)]-β-thioglucoside. This reaction proceeds through a cationic Au(I)-mediated intramolecular migration of the anomeric substituent onto the alkyne moiety of the propargyl group, followed by α-attack by the hydroxy group in the glycosyl acceptor on the oxocarbenium ion. The migration of the anomeric group occurs selectively through a 6-exo-dig pathway. The 2-(phenylsulfanyl)prop-2-en-1-yl group produced during the glycosylation is removable under conditions similar to those used for removing an allyl group. This reaction will be developed for further applications in orthogonal oligosaccharide synthesis.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 18 January 2021

Accepted after revision: 05 February 2021

Accepted Manuscript online:
05 February 2021

Article published online:
22 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Handbook of Chemical Glycosylation: Advances in Stereoselectivity and Therapeutic Relevance. Demchenko AV. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2008

    • Although a remarkable glycosylation has been recently reported, the reaction pathway is similar to that shown in Scheme [1a]; see:
    • 3a Xiao X, Zeng J, Fang J, Sun J, Li T, Song Z, Cai L, Wan Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 5498
    • 3b Meng L, Wu P, Fang J, Xiao Y, Xiao X, Tu G, Ma X, Teng S, Zeng J, Wan Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 11775
    • 3c Tanaka M, Nakagawa A, Nishi N, Iijima K, Sawa R, Takahashi D, Toshima K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 3644
    • 3d Walk JT, Buchan ZA, Montgomery J. Chem. Sci. 2015; 6: 3448
  • 4 Xia M.-j, Yao W, Meng X.-b, Lou Q.-h, Li Z.-j. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017; 58: 2389
  • 5 Ikuta D, Hirata Y, Wakamori S, Shimada H, Tomabechi Y, Kawasaki Y, Ikeuchi K, Hagimori T, Matsumoto S, Yamada H. Science 2019; 364: 674
  • 6 Motoyama A, Arai T, Ikeuchi K, Aki K, Wakamori S, Yamada H. Synthesis 2018; 50: 282
    • 7a Hu Z, Tang Y, Yu B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 4806
    • 7b Chen X, Shen D, Wang Q, Yang Y, Yu B. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 13957
    • 7c Yu J, Sun J, Niu Y, Li R, Liao J, Zhang F, Yu B. Chem. Sci. 2013; 4: 3899
    • 7d Yang F, Wang Q, Yu B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 5231
    • 7e Li Y, Yang X, Liu Y, Zhu C, Yang Y, Yu B. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 1871
    • 7f Li Y, Yang Y, Yu B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008; 49: 3604

    • For a review, see:
    • 7g Yu B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018; 51: 507

      Recently, a similar glycosylation reaction to that reported by Yu has also been reported, see:
    • 8a Shaw M, Thakur R, Kumar A. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 589
    • 8b Li X, Li C, Liu R, Wang J, Wang Z, Chen Y, Yang Y. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 9693
    • 8c Mishra B, Neralkar M, Hotha S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 7786
  • 9 A gold(III)-mediated glycosylation through activation of the anomeric propargyl group has been reported, see: Hotha S, Kashyap S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 9620 DOI: ; corrigendum: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 17153.
  • 10 Codée JD. C, Litjens RE. J. N, van den Bos LJ, Overkleeft HS, van der Marel GA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005; 34: 769
    • 11a Thummala Y, Raju CE, Purnachandar D, Sreenivasulu G, Doddi VR, Karunakar GV. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 3560
    • 11b Kong X.-F, Zhan F, He G.-X, Pan C.-X, Gu C.-X, Lu K, Mo D.-L, Su G.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 2006
    • 11c Naoe S, Saito T, Uchiyama M, Oishi S, Fujii N, Ohno H. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 1774
    • 11d Shibata T, Baba T, Takano H, Kanyiva KS. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 1849
    • 11e Nandakumar A, Kiruthika SE, Naveen K, Perumal PT. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014; 12: 876
  • 12 Dong X, Chen L, Zheng Z, Ma X, Luo Z, Zhang L. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 8626
  • 13 In this investigation, β-19 was detected. See the Supporting Information (SI-5) for details.
  • 14 Glycoside 19; Typical Procedure (4-F3CC6H4)3PAuNTf2 (20 mM) in CH2Cl2 (200 μL, 4.0 μmol) was added to a stirred mixture of 13 (20.0 mg, 33.0 μmol), cyclohexylmethanol (5.9 mg, 51 μmol), and activated MS 4 Å (99 mg) in CH2Cl2 (1.3 mL) at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 24 h at 0 °C. Sat. aq NaHCO3 and Et2O were added, and the mixture was filtered through a cotton–Celite pad to remove the MS. The aqueous filtrate was extracted with Et2O, and the combined organic layer was washed successively with H2O and brine. The combined organic layer was dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated, and the residue was purified by column chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (15:1 to 9:1)] to give a colorless oil; yield: 20.0 mg (84%, 27.7 μmol, α-form only); [α]D 24 +34.5 (c 1.47, CHCl3). IR (ATR): 3063, 3024, 2922, 2853, 1647, 1452, 1323, 1071, 772 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 24 °C): δ = 7.46–7.13 (m, 16 H), 7.06 (dd, J = 6.4, 2.8 Hz, 2 H), 5.66 (s, 1 H), 5.22 (s, 1 H), 4.85 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.58 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.51 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.40 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.35 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.27 (d, J = 10.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.25 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.20 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.18 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.13 (dd, J = 6.6, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.01 (dd, J = 6.6, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.95 (ddd, J = 6.6, 3.7, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.77 (dd, J = 10.7, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 3.69 (dd, J = 6.6, 3.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.67 (dd, J = 10.7, 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.47 (dd, J = 9.4, 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.11 (dd, J = 9.4, 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.04–2.84 (m, 4 H), 1.72–1.53 (m, 6 H), 1.22–1.01 (m, 3 H), 0.90–0.78 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3, 24 °C): δ = 141.8, 141.7, 140.3, 138.6, 136.2, 135.7, 133.0, 132.5 (2 C), 131.5, 131.0, 129.2 (2 C), 129.1, 129.0, 128.7, 128.4, 128.2 (2 C), 127.9 (2 C), 127.7, 127.4, 126.3, 126.2, 116.5, 96.6, 78.9, 75.1, 74.1, 72.9, 72.9, 72.5, 72.1, 71.5, 69.7, 66.4, 37.9, 33.5, 33.4, 30.1 (2 C), 26.7, 26.0, 25.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C45H52NaO6S: 743.3382; found: 743.3379.
  • 15 Application of the established conditions to phenylsulfanyl 3,4,6-O-tribenzyl-2-O-proparygyl-β-d-glucopyranose resulted in almost no reaction, indicating that the presence of the EDB group is essential for this glycosylation reaction.
  • 16 See the Supporting Information (SI-8) for the yields of 24 and 25. In cases when 13 was recovered, its yield is also reported.
    • 17a Kaeothip S, Demchenko AV. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 7388
    • 17b Kanie O, Ito Y, Ogawa T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994; 116: 12073