Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021; 238(08): 904-911
DOI: 10.1055/a-1333-2723
Klinische Studie

Impact of Pre- and Intraoperative Factors on Endothelial Cell Density in the Early and Late Stage after Penetrating Keratoplasty

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Jessica Brand
1   Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
,
Achim Langenbucher
2   Institut für Experimentelle Ophthalmologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
,
Elena Zemova
1   Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
,
Tanja Stachon
3   Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Zentrum für Limbusstammzellforschung und kongenitale Aniridie, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
,
Melanie Weber
1   Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
,
Jerome Rebmann
1   Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
,
1   Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
,
Nóra Szentmáry
3   Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Zentrum für Limbusstammzellforschung und kongenitale Aniridie, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
4   Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Semmelweis Universität, Budapest, Ungarn
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Aim This retrospective investigated the impact of donor age, recipient age, donor endothelial cell density, vis-à-tergo, and additional intraoperative lens exchange (triple-procedure) on overall early and late phase postoperative endothelial cell density (ECD) following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in various diagnosis groups.

Patients and Methods In 590 cases with diagnosed keratoconus (KC), Fuchs dystrophy (FD) and herpes simplex virus infection (HSV) who underwent PKP or triple surgery, the ECD in cells/mm2 was analysed, both preoperatively, with all-sutures-in (early postoperative stage), and after last suture removal. The factors were tested by Mann-Whitney U-test, correlation analysis and linear regression analysis.

Outcome Correlation analysis demonstrated a weak negative correlation between the patientʼs ECD and donor age (early postoperative stage: r = − 0.25, p < 0.001; after last suture removal: r = − 0.16; p = 0.003). Regression analysis revealed that donor age did not impact postoperative patient ECD. There was a weak negative correlation between postoperative ECD and recipient age (early postoperative stage: r = − 0.31, p < 0.001; after last suture removal: r = − 0.34, p < 0.001). Regression analysis confirmed the negative impact of recipient age on patient ECD (early postoperative stage: β = − 13.2, p = 0.001; after last suture removal: β = − 4.6, p < 0.001). Correlation analysis determined a weak positive correlation between postoperative ECD and donor endothelial cell density (early postoperative stage: r = 0.37, p < 0.001; after last suture removal: r = 0.32, p < 0.001). Regression analysis also determined that donor endothelial cell density had a positive impact on postoperative ECD following last suture removal (β = 0.4, p < 0.001). Vis-à-tergo and additional lens exchange (triple procedure) had no significant effect on postoperative ECD (p > 0.05). This was also confirmed by the results of the regression analysis after last suture removal.

Conclusion Recipient age and donor endothelial cell density have a significant impact on postoperative ECD following PKP. Not all of the statistical tests proved donor age to be a significant influencing factor. Vis-à-tergo and additional lens exchange (triple procedure) had no significant effect on postoperative ECD following PKP.



Publication History

Received: 16 July 2020

Accepted: 16 November 2020

Article published online:
17 May 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Mergler S, Pleyer U. Physiologie des humanen Hornhautendothels neue Erkenntnisse durch elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2011; 228: 520-524 DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273254.
  • 2 Yee RW, Matsuda M, Schultz RO. et al. Changes in the normal corneal endothelial cellular pattern as a function of age. Curr Eye Res 1985; 4: 671-678 DOI: 10.3109/02713688509017661.
  • 3 Beuschel R, Hofmann T, Messerli J. Ist die Abnahme der Hornhaut-Endothelzellzahl mit dem Alter wirklich linear?. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2015; 232: 375-379 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545816.
  • 4 Bourne W. Morphologic and functional evaluation of the endothelium of transplanted human corneas. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1983; 81: 403-450
  • 5 Bourne W, OʼFallon W. Endothelial cell loss during penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1978; 85: 760-766
  • 6 Winter R, Draeger J, Böhnke M. Morphologische Kriterien der Transplantatauswahl und Verlaufskontrollen bei perforierender Keratoplastik. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1983; 183: 412-414
  • 7 Szentmáry N, Goebels S, Langenbucher A. et al. Einfluss der individuellen mikrochirurgischen Technik auf Endothelzelldichte und Pachymetrie nach perforierender Keratoplastik bei Patienten mit Fuchs-Dystrophie oder Keratokonus. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2015; 232: 1184-1189 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545734.
  • 8 Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, Seitz B. Predictive donor factors for chronic endothelial cell loss after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty in a regression model. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 241: 975-981 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-003-0701-1.
  • 9 Wakefield MJ, Armitage WJ, Jones MNA. et al. The impact of donor age and endothelial cell density on graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 986-989 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306871.
  • 10 Lass JH, Benetz BA, Gal RL. et al. Donor age and factors related to endothelial cell loss 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty: Specular microscopy ancillary study. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 2428-2435 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.044.
  • 11 Uphoff J, Bednarz J, Engelmann K. Verlauf der Endothelzelldichte nach perforierender Keratoplastik. Einfluss von spender- und empfängerabhängigen Faktoren. Ophthalmologe 2001; 98: 550-554
  • 12 Böhringer D, Reinhard T, Spelsberg H. et al. Influencing factors on chronic endothelial cell loss characterised in a homogeneous group of patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 35-38
  • 13 Reinhard T, Böhringer D, Hüschen D. et al. Chronischer Endothelzellverlust des Transplantats nach perforierender Keratoplastik: Einfluss der Migration von Endothelzellen vom Transplantat zur Wirtshornhaut. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2002; 219: 410-416
  • 14 Bertelmann E, Pleyer U, Rieck P. Risk factors for endothelial cell loss post-keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006; 84: 766-770 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00726.x.
  • 15 Olsen T. Post-operative changes in the endothelial cell densitiy of corneal grafts. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1981; 59: 863-870
  • 16 Chung SH, Kim HK, Kim MS. Corneal endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty in relation to preoperative recipient endothelial cell density. Ophthalmologica 2010; 224: 194-198 DOI: 10.1159/000252983.
  • 17 Redbrake C, Becker J, Salla S. et al. The influence of the cause of death and age on human corneal metabolism distribution of mean postmortem time and donor age in different groups of cause of death. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 3553-3556
  • 18 Schumacher M, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Entwicklung der Endothelzelldichte nach perforierender Keratoplastik bei Patienten mit Fuchs-Dystrophie oder Keratokonus – Vergleich von Excimer-Laser- und mechanischer Trepanation. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2017; 234: 697-705 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-119447.
  • 19 Tóth G, Butskhrikidze T, Seitz B. et al. Endothelial cell density and corneal graft thickness following excimer laser vs. femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty-a prospective randomized study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 257: 975-981 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04263-9.
  • 20 Armitage WJ, Dick AD, Bourne WM. Predicting endothelial cell loss and long-term corneal graft survival. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 3326-3331
  • 21 Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Nguyen NX. et al. Corneal endothelial cell loss after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty depends on diagnosis: a regression analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002; 240: 387-392
  • 22 Lass JH, Beck RW, Benetz BA. et al. Baseline factors related to endothelial cell loss following penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129: 1149-1154 DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.102.
  • 23 Culbertson WW, Abbott RL, Forster RK. Endothelial cell loss in penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1982; 89: 600-604 DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(82)34754-5.
  • 24 Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX. et al. Graft endothelium and thickness after penetrating keratoplasty, comparing mechanical and excimer laser trephination: A prospective randomised study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001; 239: 12-17 DOI: 10.1007/s004170000225.
  • 25 Suzuki E, Kumakura S, Muramatsu R. et al. [Corneal endothelial cell changes in triple procedure]. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2002; 106: 28-33
  • 26 Böhringer D, Reinhard T, Spelsberg H. et al. Hinterkammerlinsenimplantation nach perforierender Keratoplastik: Mitursache für das späte Transplantatversagen?. Ophthalmologe 2004; 101: 1093-1097 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-004-1031-3.