Zusammenfassung
Das augenärztliche Gutachten hat oft juristische und finanzielle Folgen für die Betroffenen.
Es ist daher wichtig, dass es formal richtig und qualitativ hochwertig erstellt wird.
Leider werden die erforderlichen Untersuchungen häufig nicht optimal durchgeführt,
Befunde nicht untermauert, Formalien nicht eingehalten. In diesem Beitrag geht es
um die Grundlagen, die bei jeder Gutachtenerstellung beachtet werden müssen. Weitere
Beiträge folgen.
Abstract
The position of the ophthalmologist as an unbiased and impartial expert in the field
of tension between the client and the patient is a responsible task that should not
be underestimated. Since the ophthalmological expert assessment often has far-reaching
legal and financial consequences, it is very important that it is both formally correct
and of high quality. Unfortunately, it is becoming increasingly common to find that
the examinations required for the preparation of an expert opinion are not carried
out optimally, that findings are not substantiated or that formalities are not adhered
to correctly. This article will therefore explain how to draw up a correct ophthalmological
expert assessment that is legally unassailable. This article deals, among other things,
with the most important principles that must be considered in every expert assessment,
regardless of the type of assessment. It deliberately does not deal with details that
have to be considered in the different
types of reports. This is then done in planned follow-up articles.
Schlüsselwörter
Gutachten - DIN 58220 - Landolt-Ringe - Goldmann-Gesichtsfeld - Untersuchungsstrategien
für ärztliche Gutachten
Key words
examination strategies - expert assessment - DIN 58220 - Landolt rings - Landolt C
Goldmann kinetic perimetry
