Synthesis 2020; 52(11): 1625-1633
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1690866
feature
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Cobalt(III)-Catalyzed Redox-Neutral Coupling of Acrylamides with Activated Alkenes via C–H Bond Activation

Meledath Sudhakaran Keerthana
,
Ramasamy Manoharan
,
Masilamani Jeganmohan
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, Tamil Nadu, India   Email: mjeganmohan@iitm.ac.in
› Author Affiliations
We thank the Department of Science and Technology, Science and Engineering Research Board (DST-SERB, CRG/2018/000606), India for the support of this research. M.S.K. thanks the Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM) for an HTRA Fellowship.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 18 December 2019

Accepted after revision: 04 March 2020

Publication Date:
30 March 2020 (online)

 


We would like to dedicate this work to Prof. Chien-Hong Cheng on the occasion of his 70th birthday.

Abstract

A cobalt(III)-catalyzed coupling of substituted acrylamides with maleimides in the presence of 30 mol% pivalic acid providing olefin-migrated succinimide derivatives in a redox-neutral manner is described. The coupling reaction was examined with various substituted acrylamides and maleimides. The scope of the C–H alkylation reaction was also examined with substituted acrylates. A possible reaction mechanism involving a five-membered cobaltocycle as a key intermediate is proposed.


#

Biographical Sketches

Zoom Image

Meledath Sudhakaran Keerthana was born in Kozhikode, Kerala, India, in 1993. She received her integrated MSc degree in chemistry from the Institute for Intensive Research in Basic Sciences (IIRBS), Mahatma Gandhi University in 2017. At present, she is pursuing her PhD under the guidance of Dr. M. Jeganmohan at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT Madras), India. Her PhD research focuses on the C–H bond functionalization of organic molecules via metal-catalyzed C–H bond activation.

Zoom Image

Ramasamy Manoharan was born in Nattuvampalayam, Tamil Nadu, India, in 1989. He received his bachelor’s degree from Sri Vasavi College, Bharathiar University in 2009 and his master’s degree from Madurai Kamaraj University in 2011. He received his PhD from the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IISER Pune) under the guidance of Dr. M. Jeganmohan. His PhD research focused on the C–H bond functionalization of organic molecules via metal-catalyzed C–H bond activation.

Zoom Image

Masilamani Jeganmohan was born in Vazhapattampalayam, Tamil Nadu, India, in 1978. He received his master’s degree in organic chemistry from the University of Madras in 2001. He earned his PhD from the National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan, under the guidance of Prof. Chien-Hong Cheng in 2005 and pursued postdoctoral work in the same laboratory (2005–2009). Then, he moved to the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany, for postdoctoral study with Prof. Paul Knochel­ supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (2009–2010). He started his independent research career in November 2010 at IISER Pune as an assistant professor. In April 2016, he was promoted to associate professor at IISER Pune. At present, he is working as an associate professor at IIT Madras (October 2016–till now). He is the recipient of a DAE Young Scientist Research Award (2011), Science Academy Medal for a Young Associate, Indian Academy of Sciences (2012–2015), Science Academy Medal for Young Scientists, Indian National Science Academy (2013), Alkyl Amines – ICT Young Scientist Award by the Institute of Chemical Technology Mumbai (2013), ISCB Award of Appreciation for Chemical Science, CSIR-CDRI (2014), India and in 2019, Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry (FRSC). His research interests include the development of new synthetic methods using metal complexes as catalysts, asymmetric synthesis and natural product synthesis.

The transition-metal-catalyzed C–H functionalization reaction has evolved as an indispensable tool in synthetic organic chemistry to construct complex organic motifs in a highly atom- and step-economical manner.[1] [2] [3] After the seminal findings from Murai and co-workers,[1] transition-metal complexes such as those of Pd, Ru, Rh and Ir have been widely employed to attain carbon–carbon and carbon–heteroatom bond formation via the C–H bond activation reaction.[2] However, these transition-metal salts are less abundant in nature and consequently these transition metals are expensive. Recently, the C–H functionalization of organic molecules catalyzed by first-row transition metals, such as cobalt, nickel, copper and iron, has gained much attention from synthetic organic chemists due to the high abundance and biocompatibility of such metals.[3] In particular, the Cp*Co-catalyzed C–H bond activation reaction has emerged as a promising alternative to second- and third-row metal catalysts for the functionalization of organic molecules.[4] The functionalization of aromatics and heteroaromatics has been extensively studied by employing the Cp*Co(III) catalyst. However, only few examples are reported for functionalization of vinylic C–H bonds, due to the ineffective formation of the key cobaltocycle intermediate.[5]

Zoom Image
Scheme 1 Cp*Co(III)-catalyzed functionalization of vinylic C–H bonds (DG = directing group)

In 2014, the Glorius group reported the Cp*Co-catalyzed C–H iodination and allylation of acrylamide derivatives.[5a] [b] Subsequently, Zhang’s group and Zhong’s group have explored the vinylic C–H bond activation of enamide derivatives (Scheme [1]).[5`] [d] [e] On the other hand, succinimide is one of the important cores often found in various natural products and biologically active molecules.[6] The succinimide moiety can be incorporated into the C–H bond of organic molecules via 1,4-addition to maleimides. It is important to note that the maleimide unit is also often found in a range of natural products and biologically active molecules.[7] [8] In addition, succinimide derivatives can be readily converted into pyrrolidines, also one of the important cores found in alkaloids.[9] Due to these facts, maleimides have evolved as one of the widely employed coupling partners in C–H bond activation reactions.[10] Herein, we report a cobalt(III)-catalyzed coupling of acrylamides with maleimides via C–H activation. The present protocol provides substituted succinimide derivatives under redox-neutral conditions. The catalytic reaction is compatible with substituted acrylamides as well as maleimides. The scope of the C–H alkylation reaction was also examined with substituted acrylates. A possible reaction mechanism involving a cobaltocycle intermediate is proposed.

Table 1 Optimization Studiesa

Entry

Solvent

Acetate source

Additive

Yield (%)b

1

CH3CN

NaOPiv

AgSbF6

NR

2

1,2-DCE

NaOPiv

AgSbF6

29

3

C6H5Cl

NaOPiv

AgSbF6

NR

4

TFE

NaOPiv

AgSbF6

63

5

C6H5CF3

NaOPiv

AgSbF6

NR

6

HFIP

NaOPiv

AgSbF6

NR

7

1,4-dioxane

NaOPiv

AgSbF6

NR

8

TFE

AgOAc

AgSbF6

47

9

TFE

Cu(OAc)2·H2O

AgSbF6

NR

10

TFE

CsOAc

AgSbF6

NR

11

TFE

NaOAc

AgSbF6

NR

12

TFE

AcOH

AgSbF6

NR

13

TFE

PivOH

AgSbF6

79

14

TFE

Adm-1-COOH

AgSbF6

NR

15

TFE

mesitylenic acid

AgSbF6

NR

16

TFE

PivOH

AgOTf

NR

17

TFE

PivOH

AgBF4

45

18

TFE

PivOH

KPF6

NR

19

TFE

PivOH

59c

20

TFE

PivOH

AgSbF6

NR

21

TFE

PivOH

AgSbF6

39d

22

TFE

PivOH

AgSbF6

63e

a Reaction conditions, unless indicated otherwise: 1a (50 mg), 2a (1.2 equiv), Cp*Co(CO)I2 (10 mol%), AgSbF6 (20 mol%), acetate source (30 mol%), solvent (3.0 mL), 120 °C, 16 h.

b Isolated yield.

c [Cp*Co(CH3CN)3][SbF6]2 (5 mol%) was used.

d 60 °C, 16 h.

e 100 °C, 16 h.

Treatment of N-isobutylmethacrylamide (1a) with N-benzylmaleimide (2a) (1.2 equiv) in the presence of Cp*Co(CO)I2 (10 mol%), AgSbF6 (20 mol%) and pivalic acid (PivOH) (30 mol%) in CF3CH2OH (TFE) at 120 °C for 16 hours under nitrogen atmosphere yielded product 3aa in 79% yield (Table [1], entry 13). Initially, the alkylation reaction using NaOPiv was examined with various solvents, such as CH3CN, 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCE), chlorobenzene, TFE, (trifluoromethyl)benzene, hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) and 1,4-dioxane (entries 1–7). Among them, TFE was very effective, giving product 3aa in 63% yield (entry 4). 1,2-DCE was partially effective, providing 3aa in 29% yield (entry 2), while the remaining solvents were totally ineffective. Then, the reaction in TFE was examined with various acetate sources, such as NaOPiv, AgOAc, Cu(OAc)2·H2O, CsOAc and NaOAc. NaOPiv and AgOAc provided product 3aa in 63% and 47% yield, respectively (entries 4 and 8). Other acetate sources were ineffective. The reaction was also examined in the presence of organic acids, such as acetic acid, PivOH, mesitylenic acid and adamantane-1-carboxylic acid (Adm-1-COOH) (entries 12–15). Among them, PivOH was very effective, yielding 3aa in 79% yield (entry 13). In addition, the present reaction was examined with various additives, such as AgSbF6, AgOTf, AgBF4 and KPF6. Among them, AgSbF6 was very effective (79% yield of 3aa, entry 13), AgBF4 was partially effective (45% yield of 3aa, entry 17), and AgOTf and KPF6 were totally ineffective (entries 16 and 18). The efficiency of the cationic cobalt complex [Cp*Co(CH3CN)3][SbF6]2 was also examined. In this reaction, product 3aa was obtained in 59% yield (entry 19). This result clearly revealed that the combination of Cp*Co(CO)I2 and AgSbF6 is more effective than the cationic complex. The reaction condition in entry 20 was done under room temperature, 16h. It is important to note that the yield of product 3aa decreased drastically at lower temperatures (entries 21 and 22). These optimization studies clearly revealed that Cp*Co(CO)I2 (10 mol%), AgSbF6 (20 mol%) and PivOH (30 mol%) in TFE at 120 °C for 16 hours are the best conditions for the present reaction.

The scope of the present alkylation reaction was examined with acrylamides having various N-protecting groups under the optimized reaction conditions (Scheme [2]). N-Methyl-, N-ethyl- and N-butylacrylamides 1b, 1c and 1d reacted with 2a providing the expected alkylation products 3ba, 3ca and 3da in 64%, 69% and 72% yield, respectively. N-Allylacrylamide 1e yielded alkylation product 3ea without affecting the allyl group, in 75% yield. N-Cyclohexylacrylamide 1f reacted with N-benzylmaleimide (2a), as well as with N-methylmaleimide (2b), to produce products 3fa and 3fb in 71% and 67% yield, respectively.

Zoom Image
Scheme 2 Scope of acrylamides

N-Benzylacrylamide 1g reacted with 2a under the optimized reaction conditions providing product 3ga in 79% yield. Sterically hindered N-tert-butylacrylamide 1h also produced the expected product 3ha in 59% yield. The reaction was also examined with α-arylacrylamides such as N-isobutyl-2-(p-tolyl)acrylamide (1i) which resulted in alkylated product 3ia in 79% yield. However, the alkylation reaction is not compatible with β-alkyl- or β-aryl-substituted acrylamides due to steric hindrance at the β-position which seems to hinder formation of the key metalacycle.

The present reaction was also further examined with various N-substituted maleimides 2bi (Scheme [3]). Maleimides 2be having an alkyl substituent such as methyl, ethyl, cyclohexyl and phenethyl reacted with 1a to give the corresponding alkylated products 3abae in 64%, 69%, 73% and 69% yield, respectively. Then, the scope of maleimides was extended to N-aryl-substituted maleimides 2fi. N-Phenylmaleimide (2f) produced the expected product 3af in 79% yield, while N-arylmaleimides 2gi having a 4-Me, 4-OMe and 4-Br substituent, respectively, gave the corresponding alkylated products 3agai in 74%, 81% and 86% yield. N-Allylmaleimide (2j) produced product 3aj in 35% yield in a 10:3 E/Z ratio. However, N–H free maleimide and maleimide 2l derived from the amino acid l-alanine were found to be ineffective. Similarly, internal olefins such as maleate and fumarate were also ineffective in this reaction.

Zoom Image
Scheme 3 Scope of maleimides

The present alkylation reaction is compatible with substituted acrylates. In these reactions, the linear-selective alkylated product was observed (Scheme [4]).[11] It is important to note that in this type of transformation only vinylic C–H alkenylation was observed with acrylates. In the present reaction, interestingly, C–H alkylated product was observed which is not known in the literature. Treatment of N-benzylmethacrylamide (1g) with methyl acrylate (4a) (1.2 equiv) in the presence of Cp*Co(CO)I2 (10 mol%), AgSbF6 (20 mol%) and PivOH (30 mol%) in TFE at 120 °C for 16 hours provided C–H alkylated product 5ga in 72% yield (Scheme [4]). Ethyl acrylate (4b) and n-butyl acrylate (4c) reacted with 1g giving the linear-selective alkylated products 5gb and 5gc in 68% and 57% yield, respectively. It is interesting to note that in the reaction of 1g with cyclohexyl acrylate (4d), a seven-membered azepine derivative 5gd was observed in 55% yield under the optimized reaction conditions. However, phenyl acrylate (4e) reacted with 1g to give a 1:1 mixture of alkylated product 5ge and cyclized product 5ge′ in 54% yield.

Zoom Image
Scheme 4 Scope of activated alkenes

Based on known cobalt-catalyzed C–H bond cleavage reactions,[3] [4] [5] a possible reaction mechanism is proposed in Scheme [5]. The reaction likely commences with the formation of active catalyst 6 from Cp*Co(CO)I2, AgSbF6 and PivOH. Then, coordination of the oxygen atom of the amide group of 1 followed by C–H bond cleavage leads to the formation of cobaltocycle intermediate 7. Further, coordination of maleimide 2a into complex 7 followed by migratory insertion produces intermediate 9. Protonation of intermediate 9 by PivOH leads to the formation of alkylated product 10 and regenerates the active catalyst 6 for the next cycle.

Zoom Image
Scheme 5 Proposed mechanism

Olefin migration in intermediate 10 furnishes product 3aa, similar to Kim’s observation in the presence of a rhodium catalyst.[10e] It is important to note that the rhodium complex effectively catalyzed the C–H alkylation of β-substituted acrylamides with maleimides; however, it could not catalyze the C–H alkylation of α-substituted acrylamides with maleimides. Interestingly, in the present reaction, a less expensive cobalt complex effectively catalyzed the alkylation of α-substituted acrylamides with maleimides. It is also important to note that the whole catalytic cycle proceeds in the Co(III) state and thus an oxidation step is not needed. The reaction proceeds in a redox-neutral version and organic acid plays the dual role of protonation of the C–Co bond in intermediate 9 and deprotonation of the vinylic C–H bond by the corresponding acetate anion.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a cobalt-catalyzed C–H alkylation of acrylamides with maleimides to provide olefin-migrated alkylated products in good to excellent yields. The reaction is compatible with various substituted acrylamides and maleimides. The scope of the C–H alkylation reaction was also examined with substituted acrylates. A possible reaction mechanism involving a five-membered cobaltocycle intermediate has been proposed. The reaction proceeds in a redox-neutral version and organic acid plays the dual role of protonation of C–Co in a seven-membered cobalt intermediate and deprotonation of the C–H bond of the acrylamide by the corresponding acetate anion.

All reactions were carried out under N2 atmosphere in flame-dried glassware. Syringes which were used to transfer anhydrous solvents or reagents were purged with nitrogen prior to use (three times). Anhydrous solvents were used for the reactions. Column chromatographic purifications were performed using silica gel (120–200 mesh ASTM) from Merck, if not indicated otherwise. Standard abbreviations are used for NMR signal coupling. Commercially available metal salts were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification.


#

Substituted Succinimide Derivatives 3; General Procedure

A 15 mL Schlenk tube with septum containing Cp*Co(CO)I2 (10 mol%), acrylamide 1 (50 mg, 1 equiv), maleimide 2 (1.2 equiv) and AgSbF6 (20 mol%) was evacuated and purged with nitrogen gas three times (AgSbF6 was transferred inside a glovebox). To the tube were then added PivOH (30 mol%) and TFE (3.0 mL) via syringe; after that, the reaction mixture was evacuated and purged with nitrogen gas three times. Then, the septum was taken out immediately and a screw cap was used to cover the tube under the nitrogen atmosphere, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. Then, the mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 16 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, the mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 and filtered through Celite, and the filtrate was concentrated. The crude residue was purified through a silica gel column (40% ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent) to give pure product 3.


#

(E)-3-(1-Benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-isobutyl-2-methylpropanamide (3aa)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 92.0 mg (79%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.41–7.37 (m, 2 H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 3 H), 6.84 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.62 (bs, 1 H), 4.72 (s, 2 H), 3.31 (dd, J = 21.4, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.23 (dd, J = 21.4, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.16–3.09 (m, 1 H), 3.06 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 1.80–1.72 (m, 1 H), 1.36 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.88 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.2, 171.5, 164.1, 136.9, 135.7, 128.9, 128.7, 128.4, 127.2, 126.4, 47.1, 42.5, 42.4, 31.8, 28.4, 20.0, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C19H24N2O3)H]: 329.1865; found: 329.1859.


#

(E)-3-(1-Benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N,2-dimethyl­propanamide (3ba)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 92.0 mg (64%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.40–7.38 (m, 2 H), 7.32–7.27 (m, 3 H), 6.80 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.75 (bs, 1 H), 4.71 (s, 2 H), 3.30 (dd, J = 21.4, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.22 (dd, J = 21.4, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.11 (dq, J = 14.2, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.78 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.34 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.3, 172.1, 169.2, 136.9, 135.6, 128.9, 128.7, 128.1, 127.2, 42.5, 42.2, 31.8, 26.6, 17.2.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C16H18N2O3)H]: 287.1396; found: 287.1339.


#

(E)-3-(1-Benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-ethyl-2-methylpropanamide (3ca)

colorless semisolid; yield: 91.0 mg (69%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.40–7.36 (m, 2 H), 7.33–7.23 (m, 3 H), 6.82 (dt, J = 9.6, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.69 (s, 1 H), 4.71 (s, 2 H), 3.37–3.18 (m, 4 H), 3.09 (dq, J = 14.2, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.34 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.12 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.3, 171.4, 169.2, 136.9, 135.6, 128.9, 128.7, 128.0, 127.1, 42.4, 42.3, 34.8, 31.9, 17.3, 14.7.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C17H20N2O3)H]: 301.1552; found: 301.1552.


#

(E)-3-(1-Benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-butyl-2-methylpropanamide (3da)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 84.0 mg (72%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.42–7.37 (m, 2 H), 7.35–7.29 (m, 3 H), 6.82 (dt, J = 9.6, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.52 (bs, 1 H), 4.72 (s, 2 H), 3.27 (dd, J = 10.8, 2.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.24–3.19 (m, 2 H), 3.09 (dq, J = 14.6, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.48–1.43 (m, 2 H), 1.35 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.32–1.28 (m, 2 H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.2, 172.2, 171.4, 169.6, 169.2, 136.9, 135.7, 129.0, 128.7, 128.1, 127.2, 42.5, 42.4, 39.6, 31.9, 31.6, 20.0, 17.4, 13.7.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C19H24N2O3)H]: 329.1865; found: 329.1858.


#

(E)-N-Allyl-3-(1-benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-2-methylpropanamide (3ea)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 94.0 mg (75%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.42–7.40 (m, 2 H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 3 H), 6.83 (dt, J = 9.8, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.80 (ddd, J = 16.2, 10.8, 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.63 (bs, 1 H), 5.19–5.15 (m, 1 H), 5.14–5.13 (m, 1 H), 4.72 (s, 2 H), 3.86 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.32 (dd, J = 21.2, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.24 (dd, J = 21.2, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.13 (dq, J = 14.2, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.37 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.2, 172.0, 169.21, 136.8, 135.6, 128.9, 128.9, 128.7, 128.6,128.0, 127.2, 42.4, 42.2, 31.8, 26.5, 17.2.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C18H20N2O3)H]: 313.1552; found: 313.1580.


#

(E)-3-(1-Benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-cyclohexyl-2-methylpropanamide (3fa)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 75.0 mg (71%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.41–7.40 (m, 2 H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 3 H), 6.83 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.38 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.72 (s, 2 H), 3.80–3.63 (m, 1 H), 3.31 (dd, J = 21.2, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.22 (dd, J = 21.2, 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.06 (dq, J = 14.2, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.91–1.87 (m, 2 H), 1.72–1.60 (m, 4 H), 1.33 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.18–1.04 (m, 4 H).

13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 184.0, 173.5, 170.9, 169.3, 137.2, 135.6, 128.9, 128.9, 128.7, 128.7, 128.0, 126.9, 48.7, 42.4, 38.5, 32.9, 31.8, 27.0, 25.4, 24.8, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C21H26N2O3)H]: 355.2022; found: 355.2019.


#

(E)-N-Cyclohexyl-2-methyl-3-(1-methyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)propanamide (3fb)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 56.0 mg (67%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.83 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.84 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.84–3.68 (m, 1 H), 3.59 (bs, 1 H), 3.34 (d, J = 21.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.25 (d, J = 21.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.20–3.14 (m, 1 H), 3.06 (s, 3 H), 1.91–1.89 (m, 2 H), 1.74–1.70 (m, 2 H), 1.64–1.61 (m, 1 H), 1.38–1.30 (m, 4 H), 1.19–1.10 (m, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.7, 171.2, 169.7, 136.4, 127.3, 48.9, 42.2, 32.9, 31.7, 25.4, 24.8, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C15H22N2O3)H]: 279.1709; found: 279.1702.


#

(E)-N-Benzyl-3-(1-benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-2-methylpropanamide (3ga)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 82.0 mg (79%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.39–7.37 (m, 2 H), 7.33–7.30 (m, 2 H), 7.29–7.26 (m, 4 H), 7.21 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.83 (dt, J = 9.6, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.99 (bs, 1 H), 4.69 (s, 2 H), 4.39 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.25 (dd, J = 21.2, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.21–3.08 (m, 2 H), 1.36 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 189.4, 173.1, 171.3, 169.1, 137.7, 136.6, 135.6, 128.9, 128.8, 128.7, 128.1, 127.9, 127.8, 127.4, 43.9, 42.5, 42.3, 31.8, 29.7, 17.3.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C22H22N2O3)H]: 363.1709; found: 363.1721.


#

(E)-3-(1-Benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-(tert-butyl)-2-methylpropanamide (3ha)

Off-white semisolid; yield: 69.0 mg (59%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.42–7.40 (m, 2 H), 7.33–7.29 (m, 3 H), 6.83 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.37 (s, 1 H), 4.72 (s, 2 H), 3.31 (dd, J = 21.4, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.22 (dd, J = 21.4, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.09–2.94 (m, 1 H), 1.97 (s, 3 H), 1.33 (s, 9 H).

13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.5, 171.1, 171.00, 137.6, 128.8, 128.6, 127.9, 121.3, 51.6, 43.0, 42.3, 31.8, 28.6, 27.1, 18.5, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C19H24N2O3)H]: 329.1865; found: 329.1883.

(E)-3-(1-Benzyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-isobutyl-2-(p-tolyl)propanamide (3ia)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 74.0 mg (79%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.31–7.30 (m, 2 H), 7.24–7.22 (m, 4 H), 7.13–7.07 (m, 4 H), 5.35 (bs, 1 H), 4.63 (s, 2 H), 4.15 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.21 (d, J = 21.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.99–2.87 (m, 3 H), 2.27 (s, 3 H), 1.65–1.57 (m, 1 H), 0.72 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.4, 170.2, 169.2, 138.3, 135.7, 135.4, 133.7, 133.1, 130.3, 129.9, 129.7, 128.9, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.2, 128.1, 127.9, 53.3, 47.2, 42.4, 32.1, 28.4, 21.1, 19.9.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C25H28N2O3)H]: 405.2178; found: 405.2198.


#

(E)-N-Isobutyl-2-methyl-3-(1-methyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)propanamide (3ab)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 57.0 mg (64%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.84 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.72 (s, 1 H), 3.33 (d, J = 21.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.25 (d, J = 21.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.20–3.11 (m, 1 H), 3.12–3.08 (m, 2 H), 3.06 (s, 3 H), 1.86–1.69 (m, 1 H), 1.38 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.7, 171.6, 169.6, 136.5, 127.2, 47.1, 42.4, 31.8, 28.4, 24.8, 20.0, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C13H20N2O3)H]: 253.1552; found: 253.1553.


#

(E)-3-(1-Ethyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-isobutyl-2-methylpropanamide (3ac)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 65.0 mg (69%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.83 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.70 (s, 1 H), 3.63 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.31 (d, J = 21.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.23 (d, J = 21.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.18–3.12 (m, 1 H), 3.08 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2 H), 1.76 (dt, J = 20.2, 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.38 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 1.20 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.4, 171.7, 136.4, 127.4, 47.1, 42.4, 33.8, 31.8, 28.4, 20.0, 17.5, 13.1.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C14H22N2O3)H]: 267.1709; found: 267.1716.


#

(E)-3-(1-Cyclohexyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-isobutyl-2-methylpropanamide (3ad)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 83.0 mg (73%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.78 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.59 (bs, 1 H), 4.05 (tt, J = 12.2, 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.26 (dd, J = 21.2, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.22–3.15 (m, 1 H), 3.15–3.11 (m, 1 H), 3.08 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 2.16 (q, J = 12.6 Hz, 2 H), 1.83 (d, J = 12.8 Hz, 2 H), 1.76 (dd, J = 13.6, 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 1.68–1.55 (m, 2 H), 1.37 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.34–1.31 (dd, J = 26.6, 13.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.6, 171.6, 169.6, 135.9, 127.3, 51.8, 47.1, 42.4, 31.8, 28.8, 28.5, 25.8, 25.0, 20.1, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C18H28N2O3)H]: 321.2178; found: 321.2235.


#

(E)-3-(2,5-Dioxo-1-phenethylpyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-isobutyl-2-methylpropanamide (3ae)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 84.0 mg (69%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.36–7.26 (m, 2 H), 7.24–7.17 (m, 3 H), 6.82 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1 H), 5.57 (s, 1 H), 3.83–3.79 (m, 2 H), 3.28 (d, J = 21.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.25–3.13 (m, 2 H), 3.08 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.94–2.87 (m, 2 H), 1.81–1.73 (m, 1 H), 1.38 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.6, 172.1, 171.6, 137.7, 137.2, 136.5, 135.9,128.9, 128.8, 128.6, 127.2, 126.7, 47.1, 42.4, 40.0, 33.7, 31.7, 28.5, 20.1, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C20H26N2O3)H]: 343.2022; found: 343.2038.


#

(E)-3-(2,5-Dioxo-1-phenylpyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-isobutyl-2-methylpropanamide (3af)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 88.0 mg (79%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.48 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.31 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.96 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.82 (bs, 1 H), 3.52 (dd, J = 21.6, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.42 (dd, J = 21.6, 2.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.22 (dq, J = 14.2, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.09 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 1.85–1.70 (m, 1 H), 1.41 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.7, 171.7, 168.6, 137.8, 131.8, 129.2, 128.7, 126.9, 126.4, 47.2, 42.5, 32.0, 28.4, 20.1, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C18H22N2O3)H]: 315.1709; found: 315.1701.


#

(E)-3-(2,5-Dioxo-1-(p-tolyl)pyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-isobutyl-2-methylpropanamide (3ag)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 86.0 mg (74%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.28 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.23–7.13 (m, 2 H), 6.95 (dt, J = 9.6, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.82 (s, 1 H), 3.50 (dd, J = 21.4, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.41 (dd, J = 21.4, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.21 (dq, J = 9.6, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.10–3.04 (m, 2 H), 2.38 (s, 3 H), 1.81–1.73 (m, 1 H), 1.40 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.8, 171.6, 168.8, 138.8, 137.8, 129.9, 129.1, 126.9, 126.2, 47.1, 42.5, 32.0, 28.5, 21.2, 20.1, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C19H24N2O3)H]: 329.1865; found: 329.1857.


#

(E)-N-Isobutyl-3-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-2-methylpropanamide (3ah)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 99.0 mg (81%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.15 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.87 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.64 (s, 1 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 3.45–3.39 (m, 1 H), 3.37–3.28 (m, 1 H), 3.16–3.10 (m, 1 H), 3.01 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 1.69 (dd, J = 13.4, 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.33 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.84 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.9, 171.5, 168.8, 159.6, 137.7, 127.6, 126.9, 124.4, 114.5, 55.5, 47.1, 42.5, 31.9, 28.5, 20.1, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C19H24N2O4)H]: 345.1814; found: 345.1808.


#

(E)-3-(1-(4-Bromophenyl)-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-isobutyl-2-methylpropanamide (3ai)

Colorless semisolid; yield: 120.0 mg (86%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.60 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.97 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.71 (bs, 1 H), 3.51 (dd, J = 21.6, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.42 (dd, J = 21.6, 1.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.24–3.15 (m, 2 H), 3.09 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.83–1.73 (m, 1 H), 1.41 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.3, 171.4, 168.2, 138.4, 132.3, 130.8, 127.8, 126.5, 122.5, 47.1, 42.6, 32.0, 28.5, 20.0, 17.5.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [(C18H21BrN2O3)H]: 393.0814; found: 393.0870.


#

(E)-3-(1-Allyl-2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-3-ylidene)-N-isobutyl-2-methylpropanamide (3aj)

Orange liquid; yield: 66 mg (35% yield).

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.78 (dt, J = 9.6, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.77–5.68 (m, 1 H), 5.56 (s, 1 H), 5.15 (m, 1 H), 4.11 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2 H), 3.23 (m, 2 H), 3.01 (td, J = 6.9, 2.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.08 (dd, J = 14.4, 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 1.72–1.65 (m, 2 H), 1.31 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 0.83 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 6 H).

13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.09, 171.50, 170.78, 169.03, 136.83, 134.16, 134.11, 133.77, 130.55, 129.54, 128.72, 127.13, 118.53, 115.32, 60.39, 47.06, 42.41, 40.94, 37.34, 31.81, 29.67, 28.51, 28.43, 27.51, 25.45, 20.12, 20.02, 17.45, 14.17, 12.87.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for [(C15H22N2O3)Na]: 301.1528; found: 301.1523.


#

Linear-Selective Alkylated Acrylamide Derivatives 5; General Procedure

A 15 mL Schlenk tube with septum containing Cp*Co(CO)I2 (10 mol%), N-benzylacrylamide 1g (100 mg, 1 equiv) and AgSbF6 (20 mol%) was evacuated and purged with nitrogen gas three times (AgSbF6 was transferred inside a glovebox). To the tube were then added acrylate 4 (3.0 equiv), PivOH (30 mol%) and TFE (3.0 mL) via syringe; after that, the reaction mixture was evacuated and purged with nitrogen gas three times. Then, the septum was taken out immediately and a screw cap was used to cover the tube under the nitrogen atmosphere, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. Then, the mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 16 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, the mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 and filtered through Celite, and the filtrate was concentrated. The crude residue was purified through a silica gel column (40% ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent) to give pure product 5.


#

Methyl (Z)-6-(Benzylamino)-5-methyl-6-oxohex-4-enoate (5ga)

Colorless liquid; yield: 96.0 mg (72%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.39–7.32 (m, 2 H), 7.32–7.25 (m, 3 H), 6.33–6.31 (m, 1 H), 6.07 (bs, 1 H), 4.50 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.68 (s, 3 H), 2.53–2.34 (m, 4 H), 1.89 (s, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.2, 168.9, 138.3, 133.9, 132.1, 128.8, 127.9, 127.6, 51.8, 43.9, 32.9, 23.7, 12.8.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for [(C15H19NO3)Na]: 284.1263; found: 284.1259.


#

Ethyl (Z)-6-(Benzylamino)-5-methyl-6-oxohex-4-enoate (5gb)

Colorless liquid; yield: 90 mg (68%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.37–7.26 (m, 5 H), 6.33 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.09 (s, 1 H), 4.49 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.13 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 2.49–2.38 (m, 4 H), 1.89 (s, 3 H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.7, 168.9, 138.3, 133.9, 131.9, 128.7, 127.8, 127.5, 60.5, 43.8, 33.2, 23.6, 14.1, 12.8.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for [(C16H21NO3)Na]: 298.1419; found: 298.1412.


#

Butyl (Z)-6-(Benzylamino)-5-methyl-6-oxohex-4-enoate (5gc)

Colorless liquid; yield: 75.0 mg (57%).

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.39–7.22 (m, 5 H), 6.32 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.01 (s, 1 H), 4.50 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.07 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 2.44 (m, 4 H), 1.89 (s, 3 H), 1.59 (dd, J = 14.7, 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 1.37 (m, 2 H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.8, 168.9, 138.3, 133.9, 132.1, 128.7, 127.9, 127.5, 64.5, 43.9, 33.2, 30.6, 23.7, 19.1, 13.7, 12.8.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for [(C18H25NO3)Na]: 303.181; found: 303.187.


#

1-Benzyl-6-methyl-3,4-dihydro-1H-azepine-2,7-dione (5gd)

Colorless liquid; yield: 36.0 mg (55%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.34 (dd, J = 7.8, 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 7.31–7.26 (m, 2 H), 6.31 (td, J = 7.2, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.50–4.49 (m, 2 H), 2.57–2.52 (m, 2 H), 2.53–2.48 (m, 2 H), 1.89 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 171.1, 168.8, 138.3, 133.0, 132.6, 128.8, 128.7, 127.8, 127.6, 43.9, 32.6, 23.3, 12.8.

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for [(C14H15NO2)Na]: 252.0995; found: 252.0999.


#

Phenyl (Z)-6-(Benzylamino)-5-methyl-6-oxohex-4-enoate (5ge) + 1-Benzyl-6-methyl-3,4-dihydro-1H-azepine-2,7-dione (5ge′)

Colorless liquid; yield: 86.0 mg (54%).

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.43–7.18 (m, 13 H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2 H), 6.42 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1 H), 6.32 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.09 (s, 1 H), 4.49 (dd, J = 9.4, 4.8 Hz, 4 H), 2.70 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 2.55 (dq, J = 12.8, 6.9 Hz, 6 H), 1.92 (s, 3 H), 1.89 (s, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 171.22, 171.00, 168.83, 168.71, 150.48, 138.26, 133.44, 133.01, 132.45, 132.30, 129.41, 128.69, 127.81, 127.49, 125.86, 121.42, 43.82, 33.23, 32.54, 23.58, 23.31, 12.85, 12.78.


#
#

Supporting Information

  • References

  • 1 Murai S, Kakiuchi F, Sekine S, Tanaka Y, Kamatani A, Sonoda M, Chatani N. Nature 1993; 366: 529
    • 2a Sambiagio C, Schönbauer D, Blieck R, Dao-Huy T, Pototschnig G, Schaaf P, Wiesinger T, Zia MF, Wencel-Delord J, Besset T, Maes BU. W, Schnürch M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018; 47: 6603
    • 2b Kim D.-S, Park W.-J, Jun C.-H. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 8977
    • 2c Park Y, Kim Y, Chang S. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 9247
    • 2d Gensch T, Hopkinson MN, Glorius F, Wencel-Delord J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016; 45: 2900
    • 2e Gandeepan P, Cheng C.-H. Chem. Asian J. 2015; 10: 824
    • 2f Zhang F, Spring DR. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 6906
    • 2g Rouquet G, Chatani N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 11726
    • 2h Song G, Wang F, Li X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 3651
    • 2i Satoh T, Miura M. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 11212
    • 3a Rao W.-H, Shi B.-F. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 1028
    • 3b Liu W, Ackermann L. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 3743
    • 3c Miao J, Ge H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 7859
    • 3d Su B, Cao Z.-C, Shi Z.-J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015; 48: 886
    • 3e Guo X.-X, Gu D.-W, Wu Z, Zhang W. Chem. Rev. 2015; 115: 1622
    • 3f Tasker SZ, Standley EA, Jamison TF. Nature 2014; 509: 299
    • 3g Yamaguchi J, Muto K, Itami K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 19
    • 3h Nakamura E, Yoshikai N. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 6061
    • 3i Kulkarni AA, Daugulis O. Synthesis 2009; 4087
    • 4a Yoshino T, Ikemoto H, Matsunaga S, Kanai M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 2207
    • 4b Yoshino T, Matsunaga S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 1245
    • 4c Chen X, Hu X, Deng Y, Jiang H, Zeng W. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 4742
    • 4d Mandal R, Sundararaju B. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 2544
    • 4e Gandeepan P, Rajamalli P, Cheng C.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 4308
    • 4f Ghorai J, Reddy AC. S, Anbarasan P. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 16042
    • 4g Kuppusamy R, Muralirajan K, Cheng C.-H. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 3909
    • 4h Ackermann L. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 8948
    • 4i Gao K, Yoshikai N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014; 47: 1208
    • 4j Patel P, Chang S. ACS Catal. 2015; 5: 853
    • 5a Yu D.-G, Gensch T, de Azambuja F, Vásquez-Céspedes S, Glorius F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 17722
    • 5b Gensch T, Vásquez-Céspedes S, Yu D.-G, Glorius F. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 3714
    • 5c Yu W, Zhang W, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Liu Z, Zhang Y. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 24768
    • 5d Yu W, Zhang W, Liu Y, Liu Z, Zhang Y. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 77
    • 5e Li T, Shen C, Sun Y, Zhang J, Xiang P, Lu X, Zhong G. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 7772
    • 6a Cheng C.-F, Lai Z.-C, Lee Y.-J. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 4347
    • 6b Ishiyama T, Tokuda K, Ishibashi T, Ito A, Toma S, Ohno Y. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007; 572: 160
    • 6c Robert F, Gao HQ, Donia M, Merrick WC, Hamann MT, Pelletier J. RNA 2006; 12: 717
    • 6d Luzzio FA, Duveau DY, Lepper ER, Figg WD. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 10117
    • 7a Yan J, Zheng B, Pan D, Yang R, Xu Y, Wang L, Yang M. Polym. Chem. 2015; 6: 6133
    • 7b Braunecker WA, Owczarczyk ZR, Garcia A, Kopidakis N, Larsen RE, Hammond SR, Ginley DS, Olson DC. Chem. Mater. 2012; 24: 1346
    • 7c Sletten EM, Bertozzi CR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 6974
    • 7d Yang C.-P, Su Y.-Y, Hsu M.-Y. Polym. J. 2006; 38: 132
    • 7e Peifer C, Stoiber T, Unger E, Totzke F, Schächtele C, Marmé D, Brenk R, Klebe G, Schollmeyer D, Dannhardt G. J. Med. Chem. 2006; 49: 1271
    • 7f Tamizmani M, Ramesh B, Jeganmohan M. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 3746
    • 7g Tamizmani M, Gouranga N, Jeganmohan M. ChemistrySelect 2019; 4: 2976
    • 8a Obniska J, Kopytko M, Zagórska A, Chlebek I, Kamiński K. Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 2010; 343: 333 ; and references cited therein
    • 8b Han SH, Kim S, De U, Mishra NK, Park J, Sharma S, Kwak JH, Han S, Kim HS, Kim IS. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 12416
    • 8c Sharma S, Oh Y, Mishra NK, De U, Jo H, Sachan R, Kim HS, Jung YH, Kim IS. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 3359
    • 8d Han S, Park J, Kim S, Lee SH, Sharma S, Mishra NK, Jung YH, Kim IS. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 4666
    • 8e Sharma S, Han SH, Jo H, Han S, Mishra NK, Choi M, Jeong T, Park J, Kim IS. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 3611
    • 8f Han SH, Mishra NK, Jeon M, Kim S, Kim HS, Jung SY, Jung YH, Ku JM, Kim IS. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 3900
    • 8g Han SH, Mishra NK, Jo H, Oh Y, Jeon M, Kim S, Kim WJ, Lee JS, Kim HS, Kim IS. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 2396
  • 9 Jasper A, Schepmann D, Lehmkuhl K, Vela JM, Buschmann H, Holenz J, Wünsch B. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012; 53: 327

    • Review:
    • 10a Manoharan R, Jeganmohan M. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2019; 8: 1949 ; and references cited therein

    • Selected examples:
    • 10b Bettadapur KR, Lanke V, Prabhu KR. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 4658
    • 10c Bettadapur KR, Sherikar MS, Lanke V, Prabhu KR. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018; 7: 1338
    • 10d Muniraj N, Prabhu KR. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 1068
    • 10e Sharma S, Han SH, Oh Y, Mishra NK, Lee SH, Oh JS, Kim IS. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 2568
    • 10f Mandal R, Emayavaramban B, Sundararaju B. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 2835
    • 10g Manoharan R, Logeswaran R, Jeganmohan M. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 14830

      Selected papers:
    • 11a Zell D, Bursch M, Müller V, Grimme S, Ackermann L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 10378
    • 11b Barsu N, Emayavaramban B, Sundararaju B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 4370

  • References

  • 1 Murai S, Kakiuchi F, Sekine S, Tanaka Y, Kamatani A, Sonoda M, Chatani N. Nature 1993; 366: 529
    • 2a Sambiagio C, Schönbauer D, Blieck R, Dao-Huy T, Pototschnig G, Schaaf P, Wiesinger T, Zia MF, Wencel-Delord J, Besset T, Maes BU. W, Schnürch M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018; 47: 6603
    • 2b Kim D.-S, Park W.-J, Jun C.-H. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 8977
    • 2c Park Y, Kim Y, Chang S. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 9247
    • 2d Gensch T, Hopkinson MN, Glorius F, Wencel-Delord J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016; 45: 2900
    • 2e Gandeepan P, Cheng C.-H. Chem. Asian J. 2015; 10: 824
    • 2f Zhang F, Spring DR. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014; 43: 6906
    • 2g Rouquet G, Chatani N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 11726
    • 2h Song G, Wang F, Li X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 3651
    • 2i Satoh T, Miura M. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 11212
    • 3a Rao W.-H, Shi B.-F. Org. Chem. Front. 2016; 3: 1028
    • 3b Liu W, Ackermann L. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 3743
    • 3c Miao J, Ge H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 7859
    • 3d Su B, Cao Z.-C, Shi Z.-J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015; 48: 886
    • 3e Guo X.-X, Gu D.-W, Wu Z, Zhang W. Chem. Rev. 2015; 115: 1622
    • 3f Tasker SZ, Standley EA, Jamison TF. Nature 2014; 509: 299
    • 3g Yamaguchi J, Muto K, Itami K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 19
    • 3h Nakamura E, Yoshikai N. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 6061
    • 3i Kulkarni AA, Daugulis O. Synthesis 2009; 4087
    • 4a Yoshino T, Ikemoto H, Matsunaga S, Kanai M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 2207
    • 4b Yoshino T, Matsunaga S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 1245
    • 4c Chen X, Hu X, Deng Y, Jiang H, Zeng W. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 4742
    • 4d Mandal R, Sundararaju B. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 2544
    • 4e Gandeepan P, Rajamalli P, Cheng C.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 4308
    • 4f Ghorai J, Reddy AC. S, Anbarasan P. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 16042
    • 4g Kuppusamy R, Muralirajan K, Cheng C.-H. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 3909
    • 4h Ackermann L. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 8948
    • 4i Gao K, Yoshikai N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014; 47: 1208
    • 4j Patel P, Chang S. ACS Catal. 2015; 5: 853
    • 5a Yu D.-G, Gensch T, de Azambuja F, Vásquez-Céspedes S, Glorius F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 17722
    • 5b Gensch T, Vásquez-Céspedes S, Yu D.-G, Glorius F. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 3714
    • 5c Yu W, Zhang W, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Liu Z, Zhang Y. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 24768
    • 5d Yu W, Zhang W, Liu Y, Liu Z, Zhang Y. Org. Chem. Front. 2017; 4: 77
    • 5e Li T, Shen C, Sun Y, Zhang J, Xiang P, Lu X, Zhong G. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 7772
    • 6a Cheng C.-F, Lai Z.-C, Lee Y.-J. Tetrahedron 2008; 64: 4347
    • 6b Ishiyama T, Tokuda K, Ishibashi T, Ito A, Toma S, Ohno Y. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007; 572: 160
    • 6c Robert F, Gao HQ, Donia M, Merrick WC, Hamann MT, Pelletier J. RNA 2006; 12: 717
    • 6d Luzzio FA, Duveau DY, Lepper ER, Figg WD. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 10117
    • 7a Yan J, Zheng B, Pan D, Yang R, Xu Y, Wang L, Yang M. Polym. Chem. 2015; 6: 6133
    • 7b Braunecker WA, Owczarczyk ZR, Garcia A, Kopidakis N, Larsen RE, Hammond SR, Ginley DS, Olson DC. Chem. Mater. 2012; 24: 1346
    • 7c Sletten EM, Bertozzi CR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 6974
    • 7d Yang C.-P, Su Y.-Y, Hsu M.-Y. Polym. J. 2006; 38: 132
    • 7e Peifer C, Stoiber T, Unger E, Totzke F, Schächtele C, Marmé D, Brenk R, Klebe G, Schollmeyer D, Dannhardt G. J. Med. Chem. 2006; 49: 1271
    • 7f Tamizmani M, Ramesh B, Jeganmohan M. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 3746
    • 7g Tamizmani M, Gouranga N, Jeganmohan M. ChemistrySelect 2019; 4: 2976
    • 8a Obniska J, Kopytko M, Zagórska A, Chlebek I, Kamiński K. Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 2010; 343: 333 ; and references cited therein
    • 8b Han SH, Kim S, De U, Mishra NK, Park J, Sharma S, Kwak JH, Han S, Kim HS, Kim IS. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 12416
    • 8c Sharma S, Oh Y, Mishra NK, De U, Jo H, Sachan R, Kim HS, Jung YH, Kim IS. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 3359
    • 8d Han S, Park J, Kim S, Lee SH, Sharma S, Mishra NK, Jung YH, Kim IS. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 4666
    • 8e Sharma S, Han SH, Jo H, Han S, Mishra NK, Choi M, Jeong T, Park J, Kim IS. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 3611
    • 8f Han SH, Mishra NK, Jeon M, Kim S, Kim HS, Jung SY, Jung YH, Ku JM, Kim IS. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 3900
    • 8g Han SH, Mishra NK, Jo H, Oh Y, Jeon M, Kim S, Kim WJ, Lee JS, Kim HS, Kim IS. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017; 359: 2396
  • 9 Jasper A, Schepmann D, Lehmkuhl K, Vela JM, Buschmann H, Holenz J, Wünsch B. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012; 53: 327

    • Review:
    • 10a Manoharan R, Jeganmohan M. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2019; 8: 1949 ; and references cited therein

    • Selected examples:
    • 10b Bettadapur KR, Lanke V, Prabhu KR. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 4658
    • 10c Bettadapur KR, Sherikar MS, Lanke V, Prabhu KR. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018; 7: 1338
    • 10d Muniraj N, Prabhu KR. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 1068
    • 10e Sharma S, Han SH, Oh Y, Mishra NK, Lee SH, Oh JS, Kim IS. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 2568
    • 10f Mandal R, Emayavaramban B, Sundararaju B. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 2835
    • 10g Manoharan R, Logeswaran R, Jeganmohan M. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 14830

      Selected papers:
    • 11a Zell D, Bursch M, Müller V, Grimme S, Ackermann L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 10378
    • 11b Barsu N, Emayavaramban B, Sundararaju B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 4370

Zoom Image
Zoom Image
Zoom Image
Zoom Image
Scheme 1 Cp*Co(III)-catalyzed functionalization of vinylic C–H bonds (DG = directing group)
Zoom Image
Scheme 2 Scope of acrylamides
Zoom Image
Scheme 3 Scope of maleimides
Zoom Image
Scheme 4 Scope of activated alkenes
Zoom Image
Scheme 5 Proposed mechanism