Synlett 2010(7): 1118-1122  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1219553
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Chemo-, Regio-, and Stereoselective Synthesis of syn-Aryl Glycol Monoesters from Aryl Olefins with Hydrogen Peroxide Catalyzed by RuCl3

Yanqiao Zhang, Guobiao Chu, Xiaoxue Cui, Zhijie Han, Daoke Dou, Yuanli Chen, Xiaosong Yu, Chunbao Li*
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, P. R. of China
Fax: +86(22)27403475; e-Mail: lichunbao@tju.edu.cn;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 22 December 2009
Publication Date:
26 February 2010 (online)

Abstract

Chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity have been achieved in the oxidations of aryl olefins. The aryl olefins were oxidized by 2 equivalents of H2O2 in acetic acid, catalyzed by 0.02 equivalent of RuCl3, leading to the formations of syn-aryl glycol monoesters. As the reaction is concerted, both the regio- and stereo­selectivity are excellent. In the presence of aliphatic C=C bonds, the aryl C=C bonds were selectively dioxygenated. This represents the first example of chemoselective dioxygenation of aryl C=C bonds.

    References and Notes

  • 1a El-Zayat AAE. Ferrigni NR. McCloud TG. McKenzie AT. Byrn SR. Cassady JM. Chang C. McLaughlin JL. Tetrahedron Lett.  1985,  26:  955 
  • 1b Mukai C. Yamashita H. Hirai S. Hanaoka M. McLaughlin JL. Chem. Pharm. Bull.  1999,  47:  131 
  • 1c Blazquez MA. Bermejjo A. Zafra-Polo MC. Cortes D. Phytochem. Anal.  1999,  10:  161 
  • 1d Mereyala HB. Joe M. Curr. Med. Chem. Anti-Cancer Agents  2001,  1:  293 
  • 1e Yan D. Chen H. Xu X. Cheng M. Wang H. Li A. Shi L. Chinese J. Struct. Chem.  2004,  23:  571 
  • 1f Tuchida P. Munyoo B. Pohmakotr M. Thinapong P. Sophasan S. Santisuk T. Reutrakul V. J. Nat. Prod.  2006,  69:  1728 
  • 2a Min H. Park E. Hong J. Kang Y. Kim S. Chung H. Woo E. Hung T. Youn UJ. Kim YS. Kang SS. Bae K. Lee SK. Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2008,  18:  523 ; and references cited therein
  • 2b Shen Y. Lin Y. Cheng Y. Chiang MY. Liou S. Khalil AT. Phytochemistry  2009,  70:  114 
  • 3a Woodward RB. Brutcher FV. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1958,  80:  209 
  • 3b Li Y. Song D. Dong VM. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2008,  130:  2962 
  • 4a Kolb HC. VanNiewenhze MS. Sharpless KB. Chem. Rev.  1994,  94:  2483 
  • 4b Shing TKM. Tai VW. Tam EKW. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.  1994,  33:  2312 
  • 4c Plietker B. Niggemann M. Org. Lett.  2003,  5:  3353 
  • 4d Santoro S. Santi C. Sabatini M. Testaferri L. Tiecco M. Adv. Synth. Catal.  2008,  350:  2881 ; and references cited therein
  • 5 Yang Z. Zhou W. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.  1995,  743 
  • 6 Deubel DV. Frenking G. Acc. Chem. Res.  2003,  36:  645 
  • 7a Higuchi T. Ohtake H. Hirobe M. Tetrahedron Lett.  1989,  30:  6545 
  • 7b Ohtake H. Higuchi T. Hirobe M. Tetrahedron Lett.  1992,  33:  2521 
  • 7c Groves JT. Quinn R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1985,  107:  5790 
  • 7d Groves JT. Bonchio M. Carofilio T. Shalyaev T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1996,  118:  8961 
  • 7e Murahashi S. Komiya N. In Modern Oxidation Methods   Bäckvall J. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004.  p.165 
  • 8 Murahashi S. Saito T. Hanaoka H. Murakami Y. Naota T. Kumobayashi H. Akutagawa S. J. Org. Chem.  1993,  58:  2929 
  • 9a Vedejs E. Daugulis O. Diver ST. J. Org. Chem.  1996,  61:  430 
  • 9b Naemura K. Miyabe H. Shingai Y.
    J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  1991,  957 
  • 9c Naemura K. Murata M. Tanaka R. Yano M. Hirose K. Tobe Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1996,  7:  3285 
  • 9d Morimoto T. Hirano M. Koyama T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2  1985,  1109 
  • 10 Iida H. Tanaka M. Kibayashi C. J. Org. Chem.  1984,  49:  1909 
  • 11a Volkmann RA. Weeks PD. Kuhla DE. Whipple EB. Chmurny GN. J. Org. Chem.  1977,  42:  3976 
  • 11b Wender PA. McDonald FE. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1990,  112:  4956 
  • 11c Rumbo A. Castedo L. Mourino A. Mascarenas JL. J. Org. Chem.  1993,  58:  5585 
  • 11d Rodríguez JR. Rumbo A. Castedo L. Mascarenas JL. J. Org. Chem.  1999,  64:  4560 
12

General Procedure for the Oxidation of Aryl Olefins
To a solution of olefin (1 mmol) and RuCl3˙nH2O (0.02 mmol) in AcOH (20 mL) was added H2O2 (30%, 2 mmol) in AcOH (5 mL) dropwisely at r.t. When all H2O2 was added in 15 min, the reaction was completed as checked by TLC. The reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (100 mL), and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 30 mL). The organic layers were combined, neutralized with aq NaHCO3 (3 × 30 mL), washed with brine (3 × 30 mL), dried over anhyd Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuum to give the crude product which was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel to afford the corresponding product, the aryl glycol monoester (for details: Table  [¹] and Supporting Information). Spectroscopic Data for a Product (Entry 27, Table 1) White solid (mp 248-250 ˚C); yield 50%. IR (KBr): ν = 3436, 2935, 2814, 1731, 1675, 1546, 1218, 1034 cm. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d 6): δ = 7.34-7.04 (m, 12 H), 6.18 (m, 2 H), 6.14 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.79 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.33 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.01 (dd, J = 7.0, 14.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.46 (m, 2 H), 3.30 (m, 2 H), 2.22 (s, 3 H), 2.00 (s, 3 H), 1.56 (m, 2 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d 6): δ = 177.16, 177.14, 170.65, 137.57, 136.67, 136.11, 135.20, 134.26, 129.48, 129.32, 128.83, 128.54, 127.37, 127.01, 126.76, 126.14, 71.70, 62.55, 60.47, 52.41, 46.12, 45.50, 21.41, 21.25 ppm. ESI-MS: m/z = 585.2 [M + Na]+. ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C34H30N2O6 + Na [M + Na]+: 585.2001; found: 585.2009.