Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23(01): 14-18
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-09-02-0013
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Screw loosening six weeks after triple pelvic osteotomy

Comparison of pre-tapped with self-tapping 3.5 mm cortical screws
Y. M. Beosier
1   The Companion Animal Clinic ANUBIS, Aartselaar-Antwerp, Belgium
,
R. Daems
1   The Companion Animal Clinic ANUBIS, Aartselaar-Antwerp, Belgium
,
L. A. A. Janssens
1   The Companion Animal Clinic ANUBIS, Aartselaar-Antwerp, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 05 February 2009

Accepted: 22 July 2009

Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

A retrospective study of 62 dogs that underwent unilateral triple pelvic osteotomy with a Slocum triple pelvic osteotomy plate and Synthes 3.5 mm cortical screws. We compared the probability of screw loosening after six weeks in dogs in which pre-tapped screws were used (30 dogs), with dogs in which self-tapping screws were used (32 dogs). Screw loosening was significantly less prevalent with self-tapping screws than pre-tapped screws.

Keywords

Dog - triple pelvic osteotomy - self-tapping screws - screw loosening - pre-tapped screws
 

  • References

  • 1 Bogoni P, Rovesti GL.. Early detection and treatment of screw loosening in triple pelvic osteotomy. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 190-195.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Borostyankoi F, Rooks RL, Kobluk CN. et al. Results of single-session bilateral triple pelvic osteotomy with an eight-hole iliac bone plate in dogs: 95 cases (1996–1999). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 54-59.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Clark B, Wallace LJ, Pacchianna P.. The effect of pelvic osteotomy plate type on axial rotation of the acetabular segment in the triple pelvic osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 37-42.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Doornink MT, Nieves MA, Evans R.. Evaluation of ilial screw loosening after triple pelvic osteotomy in dogs: 227 cases (1991–1999). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 229: 535-541.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fitch RB, Hosgood G, Staatz A.. Biomechanical evaluation of triple pelvic osteotomy with and without additional ventral plate stabilization. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15: 145-149.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fitch RB, Kerwin S, Hosgood G. et al. Radiographic evaluation and comparison of triple pelvic osteotomy with and without additional ventral plate stabilization in forty dogs – part 1. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15: 164-171.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fitch RB, Kerwin S, Hosgood G. et al. Treatment of mechanically failed triple pelvic osteotomies in four dogs –part 2. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15: 172-176.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Janssens LAA, Moens Y, Coppens PM. et al. A follow-up study of dogs with hip dysplasia and hip joint laxity treated by triple pelvic osteotomy. Vlaams Dierg Tijdsch 2001; 70: 36-43.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Janssens LAA, Coppens PM, Moens Y.. Triple Pelvic Osteotomy as a treatment for hip dysplasia in dogs: diagnosis, indications, methods. Vlaams Dierg Tijdsch 2001; 70: 214-222.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Koch DA, Hazewinkel HA, Nap RC. et al. Radio-graphic evaluation and comparison of plate fixation after triple pelvic osteotomy in 32 dogs with hip dysplasia. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 6: 9-15.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Remedios AM, Fries CL.. Implant complications in 20 triple pelvic osteotomies. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 6: 202-207.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Simmons S, Johnson AL, Schaeffer DJ.. Risk factors for screw migration after triple pelvic osteotomy. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 37: 269-273.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Slocum B, Slocum DT.. Pelvic osteotomy technique for axial rotation of the acetabular segment in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 331-338.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Slocum B, Slocum DT.. Pelvic osteotomy for axial rotation of the acetabular segment in dogs with hip dysplasia. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 645-682.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sukhiani HR, Holmberg DL, Hurtig MB.. Pelvic canal narrowing caused by triple pelvic osteotomy in the dog. Part I: The effect of pubic remnant length and angle of acetabular rotation. Vet Comp Othop Traumatol 1994; 7: 110-113.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sukhiani HR, Holmberg DL, Binnington AG. et al. Pelvic canal narrowing caused by triple pelvic osteotomy in the dog. Part II: A comparison of three pubic osteotomy techniques. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 114-117.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Whelan MF, McCarthy RJ, Boudrieau RJ. et al. Increased sacral screw purchase minimizes screw loosening in canine triple pelvic osteotomy. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 609-614.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hunt CA, Litsky AS.. Stabilization of canine pelvic osteotomies with AO/ASIF plates and screws. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1988; 1: 52-57.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sardinas JC, Kraus KH, Sisson jr. RD. Comparison of the holding power of 3.5–mm cortical versus 4.0–mm cancellous orthopedic screws in the pelvis of immature dogs (cadavers). Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 248-251.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hosgood G, Lewis DD.. Retrospective evaluation of fixation complications of 49 pelvic osteotomies in 36 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1993; 34: 123-130.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Andrea CR, Stover SM, Galuppo LD. et al. Comparison of insertion time and pullout strength between self-tapping and non self-tapping AO 4.5–mm cortical bone screws in adult equine third metacarpal bone. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 189-194.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Murphy TP, Hill CM, Kapatkin AS. et al. Pullout properties of 3.5–mm AO/ASIF self-tapping and cortex screws in a uniform synthetic material and in canine bone. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 253-260.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bell JC, Ness MG.. A mechanical evaluation of pre-tapped and self-tapped screws in small bones. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 277-280.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Batulla S, Schoenfeld A, Vrabec G. et al. Experimental evaluation of the holding power/stiffness of the self-tapping bone screw in normal and osteoporotic material. Clin Biomech 2006; 21: 533-537.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Vangsness jr CT, Carter DR, Frankel VH.. In vitro evaluation of the loosening characteristics of self-tapped and non-self-tapped cortical bone screws. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981; 157: 279-286.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Berkowitz R, Njus G, Vrabec G.. Pullout strength of self-tapping screws inserted to different depths. Orthop Trauma 2005; 19: 462-465.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Heller JG, Estes BT, Zaouali M. et al. Biomechanical study of screws in the lateral masses: variables affecting pull-out resistance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 1315-1321.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schatzker J, Sanderson R, Murnaghan JP.. The holding power of orthopedic screws in vivo. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975; 108: 115-126.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 DeCamp CE, Braden TD.. Sacroiliac fracture-separation in the dog. A study of 92 cases. Vet Surg 1985; 14: 127-130.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hulse DA, Shires P, Waldron D. et al. Sacroiliac luxation. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1985; 7: 493-499.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar