Tibial plateau angle in four common canine breeds with cranial cruciate ligament rupture, and its relationship to meniscal tears

Summary

Objectives: To compare tibial plateau angle (TPA) among Labrador Retrievers, Rottweilers, Boxers, and German Shepherd Dogs that had undergone tibial plateau leveling osteotomies (TPLO) for cranial cruciate ligament disease, and to determine if higher TPAs are associated with increased risk for concurrent meniscal injury. Methods: This was a retrospective study including 275 client-owned dogs of one of the four aforementioned breeds that received TPLO radiographs between 1999 and 2005 prior to undergoing the TPLO procedure. The TPA measured by the original surgeon was compared among four breeds and analyzed with respect to presence or absence of meniscal injury diagnosed via arthroscopy or arthrotomy at the time of surgery. Results: Labrador Retrievers, Rottweilers, Boxers, and German Shepherd Dogs had mean TPAs of 25.9°, 26.2°, 25.9°, and 28.2°, respectively. The TPA of German Shepherd Dogs was significantly higher than that of the other breeds of dogs examined. TPA higher than the mean for dogs in this study did not significantly increase the risk for concurrent meniscal injury. Clinical significance: German Shepherd Dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease had a significantly higher TPA compared to the other breeds examined. Higher TPA did not increase the likelihood of meniscal tears in this study. However, several variables that were not assessed, including the degree of cranial cruciate ligament integrity at the time of surgery and the time between original CrCL deficiency and surgical assessment, could have affected this analysis.

Keywords

Tibial plateau angle (TPA) - meniscal tear - cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CrCL) - tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO)

• References

• 1 Whitehair JG, Vasseur PB, Willitis NH. Epidemiology of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 1016-1019.
• 2 Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL. The stifle joint. In: Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL. (eds). Handbook of small animal orthopedics and fracture repair. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co; 1997: 516-580.
• 3 Vasseur PB, Pool RR, Arnoczky SP. et al. Correlative biomechanical and histologic study of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46: 1842-1854.
• 4 Read Read, Robins GM. Deformity of the proximal tibia in dogs. Vet Rec 1982; 111: 295-298.
• 5 Lawrence D, Bao S, Canfield PJ. et al. Elevation of immunoglobulin deposition in the synovial membrane of dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1998; 65: 89-96.
• 6 Niebauer GW, Wolf B, Bashey RI. et al. Antibodies to canine collagen types I and II in dogs with spontaneous cruciate ligament rupture and osteoarthri- tis. Arthritis Rheum 1987; 30: 319-327.
• 7 Slocum Slocum, Devine T. Cranial tibial thrust: a primary force in the canine stifle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 183: 456-459.
• 8 Caylor KB, Zumpano CA, Evans LM. et al. Intra- and interobserver measurement variability of ti- bial plateau slope from lateral radiographs in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 37: 263-268.
• 9 Reif U, Dejardin LM, Probst CW. et al. Influence of limb positioning and measurement method on the magnitude of the tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 368-375.
• 10 Wilke VL, Conzemius MG, Besancon MF. et al. Comparison of tibial plateau angle between clinically normal Greyhounds and Labrador Retrievers with and without rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221: 1426-1429.
• 11 Lazar TP, Berry CR, deHaan JJ. et al. Long-term radiographic comparison of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy versus extracapsular stabilization for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 133-141.
• 12 Aragon Aragon, Budsberg SC. Applications of evidence-based medicine: cranial cruciate ligament injury repair in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 93-98.
• 13 Ralphs Ralphs, Whitney WO. Arthroscopic evaluation of menisci in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament injuries: 100 cases (1999-2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221: 1601-1604.
• 14 Pozzi A, Kowaleski MP, Apelt D. et al. Effect of medial meniscal release on tibial translation after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 486-494.
• 15 Priddy 2nd NH, Tomlinson JL, Dodam JR. et al. Complications with and owner assessment of the outcome of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 193 cases (1997-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 1726-1732.
• 16 Zeltzman PA, Pare B, Johnson GM. et al. Relationship between age and tibial plateau angle in dogs with cranial cruciate rupture. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2005; 41: 117-120.
• 17 Stokes IA. Mechanical effects on skeletal growth. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2002; 2: 277-280.
• 18 Cofone MA, Smith GK, Lenehan TM. et al. Unilateral and bilateral stifle arthrodesis in eight dogs. Vet Surg 1992; 21: 299-303.
• 19 Talaat MB, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Combination tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and cran ial closing wedge osteotomy of the tibia for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles with excessive tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 729-739.
• 20 Fettig AA, Rand WM, Sato AF. et al. Observer variability of tibial plateau slope measurement in 40 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joints. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 471-478.
• 21 Baroni E, Matthias RR, Marcellin-Little DJ. et al. Comparison ofradiographic assessments ofthe tibial plateau slope in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2003; 64: 586-589.
• 22 Pozzi A, Hildbreth III BE, Rajala-Schultz PJ. Comparison of arthroscopy and arthrotomy for the diagnosis ofmedial meniscal pathology: An in vitro study. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Veterinary Orthopedic Society meeting. Sun Valley, ID. USA: March 2007