Thromb Haemost 2008; 100(04): 678-684
DOI: 10.1160/TH08-02-0118
New Technologies, Diagnostic Tools and Drugs
Schattauer GmbH

Anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibody optical density values and the confirmatory procedure in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Nicole L. Whitlatch
1   Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine
,
Stephanie L. Perry
1   Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine
,
Thomas L. Ortel
1   Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine
2   Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
› Author Affiliations
Financial support: NLW: training grant T32-HL007057; SLP: K23-HL084233; TLO: CDC (UO1-DD000014); NIH (UO1-HL072289; U54-HL077878).
Further Information

Publication History

Received 28 February 2008

Accepted after major revision 09 July 2008

Publication Date:
22 November 2017 (online)

Summary

Laboratory testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) includes the highly sensitive, though less specific, heparin/ platelet factor 4 (PF4) ELISA. A confirmatory test with excess heparin is routinely performed on positive ELISA results to improve test specificity; the significance of a negative confirmatory result is unknown. The aim was firstly to evaluate the clinical utility of the PF4 ELISA confirmatory assay, secondly to examine the relationship between ELISA optical density (OD) value and clinical diagnosis of HIT, and thirdly to assess current practice at a tertiary care medical centre regarding patients with anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies. Patients with anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies detected by commercial ELISA during 2005 were identified. A confirmatory test was performed on positive ELISA results. Patients were labeled confirmatory positive (confirm+) or confirmatory negative (confirm−). Patients were classified as HIT+ (met criteria for HIT), HIT? (HIT possible), and HIT- (did not meet criteria for HIT) utilizing ACCP guidelines. One hundred fifteen patients with anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies were identified. Ninety-eight patients were confirm+;17 were confirm−. The majority of confirm+ patients were HIT+ or HIT?(72%);the majority of confirm− patients were HIT− (81%). Patients who were HIT+/confirm+ had higher ELISA OD values than patients who were HIT?/confirm+ or HIT− /confirm+ (p=0.031, p=0.001). Two confirm− patients were HIT+, one was HIT?; all had high ELISA OD values. Although confirm+ status correlated with clinical HIT, the confirmatory procedure misclassified some patients by yielding a confirm− result despite clinical HIT with high ELISA OD values. Future studies should compare higher ELISA OD values with the confirmatory procedure as strategies to improve ELISA diagnostic specificity for HIT.

 
  • References

  • 1 Warkentin TE. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a clinicopathologic syndrome. Thromb Haemost 1999; 82: 439-447.
  • 2 Warkentin TE, Greinacher A. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: recognition, treatment, and prevention: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126: 311S-337S.
  • 3 Lo GK, Juhl D, Warkentin TE. et al. Evaluation of pretest clinical score (4 T’s) for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in two clinical settings. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 04: 759-765.
  • 4 Warkentin TE, Kelton JG. A 14-year study of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Am J Med 1996; 101: 502-507.
  • 5 Greinacher A, Juhl D, Strobel U. et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a prospective study on the incidence, platelet-activating capacity and clinical significance of antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA classes. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05: 1666-1673.
  • 6 Arepally GM, Ortel TL. Clinical practice. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 809-817.
  • 7 Warkentin TE, Sheppard JA, Moore JC. et al. Laboratory testing for the antibodies that cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: how much class do we need?. J Lab Clin Med 2005; 146: 341-346.
  • 8 Warkentin TE, Sheppard JA, Horsewood P. et al. Impact of the patient population on the risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2000; 96: 1703-1708.
  • 9 Warkentin TE, Sheppard JI. No significant improvement in diagnostic specificity of an anti-PF4/polyanion immunoassay with use of high heparin confirmatory procedure. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 04: 281-282.
  • 10 Zwicker JI, Uhl L, Huang WY. et al. Thrombosis and ELISA optical density values in hospitalized patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 02: 2133-2137.
  • 11 Pouplard C, May MA, Regina S. et al. Changes in platelet count after cardiac surgery can effectively predict the development of pathogenic heparin-dependent antibodies. Br J Haematol 2005; 128: 837-841.
  • 12 Lillo-Le Louet A, Boutouyrie P, Alhenc-Gelas M. et al. Diagnostic score for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 02: 1882-1888.
  • 13 Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Andersen M, Hansen PB. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia: clinical data on 309 cases and the effect of corticosteroid therapy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 52: 183-189.
  • 14 Singer RL, Mannion JD, Bauer TL. et al. Complications from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Chest 1993; 104: 1436-1440.
  • 15 Warkentin TE, Greinacher A. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 2121-2131.
  • 16 Fabris F, Luzzatto G, Soini B. et al. Risk factors for thrombosis in patients with immune mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. J Intern Med 2002; 252: 149-154.
  • 17 Lubenow N, Eichler P, Lietz T. et al. Lepirudin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia – results of the third prospective study (HAT- 3) and a combined analysis of HAT- 1, HAT- 2, and HAT- 3. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 03: 2428-2436.