Thromb Haemost 2005; 93(05): 922-926
DOI: 10.1160/TH04-12-0809
Platelets and Blood Cells
Schattauer GmbH

Contrast medium attenuates platelet activation and platelet-leukocyte cross–talk

Qiushang Ji
1   Department of Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
3   Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
,
Melania Ghaly
1   Department of Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Paul Hjemdahl
1   Department of Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Per Tornvall
2   Cardiology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital (Solna), Stockholm, Sweden
,
Nailin Li
1   Department of Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
› Author Affiliations
Grant support: The study was supported by the grants from the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Swedish Research Council (5930), China Scholarship Council, the Swedish Medical Association, the Stockholm County Council, and the Karolinska Institute.
Further Information

Publication History

Received 16 December 2004

Accepted after revision 14 February 2005

Publication Date:
11 December 2017 (online)

Summary

The influence of ionic and non-ionic contrast media (CM) on platelet and leukocyte activation and platelet-leukocyte crosstalk was investigated in hirudinized whole blood. The blood was incubated with and without the ionic CM ioxaglate and the nonionic CM iodixanol at 37ºC for 5 min, without or with stirring. Platelet and leukocyte activation and platelet-leukocyte aggregation were measured using whole blood flow cytometry. When blood samples were pre-incubated in the presence of 2%, 5%, and 10% of CM without stirring, both ioxaglate and iodixanol had little effect on unstimulated samples, but dose-independently decreased 1 μM ADP-induced platelet P-selectin expression and fibrinogen binding, and thus platelet-leukocyte aggregate formation. Ioxaglate had little effect on leukocyte CD11b expression, whilst iodixanol slightly enhanced resting and N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP; 0.1 μM)-stimulated leukocyte CD11b expression. Blood samples were also incubated with stirring to investigate the impact of CM (5% of ioxaglate or iodixanol) on platelet-leukocyte cross-talk. Collagen induced marked platelet activation and platelet-leukocyte aggregation, and subsequently elevated leukocyte CD11b expression. The latter was attenuated by ioxaglate and iodixanol, and was accompanied by reduced platelet-leukocyte aggregation. In conclusion, the CM ioxaglate and iodixanol attenuate platelet activation and platelet-leukocyte cross-talk. Inhibitory effects of the contrast agents on this cross-talk are apparently exerted by reducing heterotypic conjugation, and may be beneficial in connection with PCI.

 
  • References

  • 1 Chronos NA, Goodall AH, Wilson DJ. et al. Profound platelet degranulation is an important side effect of some types of contrast media used in interventional cardiology. Circulation 1993; 88: 2035-44.
  • 2 Rudnick MR, Goldfarb S.. Pathogenesis of contrastinduced nephropathy: experimental and clinical observations with an emphasis on the role of osmolality. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2003; 4 (Suppl. 05) Suppl S28-33.
  • 3 Misumi K. et al. The risk of contrast media-induced ventricular fibrillation is lowin canine coronary arteriography with ioxilan. J Vet Med Sci 2000; 62: 421-6.
  • 4 Heptinstall S, White A, Edwards N. et al. Differential effects of three radiographic contrast media on platelet aggregation and degranulation: implications for clinical practice?. Br J Haematol 1998; 103: 1023-30.
  • 5 Markou CP. et al. Antithrombotic effects of ionic and non-ionic contrast media in nonhuman primates. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85: 488-93.
  • 6 Jones I C, Goodall AH. Differential effects of the iodinated contrast agents Ioxaglate, Iohexol and Iodixanol on thrombus formation and fibrinolysis. Thromb Res 2003; 112: 65-71.
  • 7 Jung F. et al. Effect of an ionic compared to a nonionic X-ray contrast agent on platelets and coagulation during diagnostic cardiac catheterisation. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 2002; 32: 121-6.
  • 8 Robertson HJ. Blood clot formation in angiographic syringes containing nonionic contrast media. Radiology 1987; 162: 621-2.
  • 9 Pislaru S, Pislaru C, Szilard M. et al. In vivo effects of contrast media on coronary thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1102-8.
  • 10 Laffan M. et al. A comparison between the platelet activating properties of different contrast media used in radiology and MRI. Br J Radiol 1997; 70: 798-804.
  • 11 Carr DH, Walker AC, White RG. Effects of radiographic contrast media on leukocyte locomotion. Invest Radiol 1981; 16: 133-40.
  • 12 Farrow R, Roobottom CA, Wells IP. et al. Effects of radiographic contrast media on leukocyte phagocytosis. Acad Radiol 1994; 1: 249-52.
  • 13 Till G, Rother U, Gemsa D. Activation of complement by radiographic contrast media: generation of chemotactic and anaphylatoxin activities. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1978; 56: 543-50.
  • 14 Feldman LJ, Chollet-Martin S, Himbert D. et al. Modulation of the expression of the granulocyte adhesion molecule, CR3, by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and contrast media. Invest Radiol 1994; 29: 313-8.
  • 15 Vermeiren GL, Willems R, Claeys MJ. et al. Influence of ionic and non-ionic radiographic contrast media on leukocyte adhesionmolecules. Mediators Inflamm 2003; 12: 269-75.
  • 16 Bazzoni G, Dejana E, Del Maschio A. Plateletneutrophil interactions. Possible relevance in the pathogenesis of thrombosis and inflammation. Haematologica 1991; 76: 491-9.
  • 17 Wagner DD, Burger PC. Platelets in inflammation and thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003; 23: 2131-7.
  • 18 Li N. et al. Platelet-leukocyte cross talk in whole blood. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20: 2702-8.
  • 19 Lee MS. et al. Molecular and cellular basis of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: the intertwining roles of platelets, leukocytes, and the coagulation- fibrinolysis system. J Pathol 2004; 203: 861-70.
  • 20 Li N. et al. Effects of serotonin on platelet activation in whole blood. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1997; 8: 517-23.
  • 21 Li N. et al. Awhole-blood flowcytometric assay for leukocyte CD11b expression using fluorescence signal triggering. Eur J Haematol 2000; 65: 57-65.
  • 22 Li N, Goodall AH, Hjemdahl P. Efficient flowcytometric assay for platelet-leukocyte aggregates in whole blood using fluorescence signal triggering. Cytometry 1999; 35: 154-61.
  • 23 Albanese JR. et al. Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on in vitro and in vivo platelet activation. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 1059-63.
  • 24 Ogawa T, Fujii S, Urasawa K. et al. Effects of nonionic contrast media on platelet aggregation: assessment by particle counting with laser-light scattering. Jpn Heart J 2001; 42: 115-24.
  • 25 Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ. et al. Plasma factors and inhibitors: procoagulants and fibrinolytic proteins. In: Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Basic Princples and Clinical Practice. Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Clowes AW, George JN. (ed) Philadelphia: Lippincott Willams & Wilkins; 2001: pp 17-20.
  • 26 Huo Y. et al. Circulating activated platelets exacerbate atherosclerosis inmice deficient in apolipoprotein E. Nat Med 2003; 9: 61-7.
  • 27 Amirkhosravi A. et al. The importance of platelets in the expression of monocyte tissue factor antigen measured by a newwhole blood flowcytometric assay. Thromb Haemost 1996; 75: 87-95.
  • 28 Giesen PL, Rauch U, Bohrmann B. et al. Bloodborne tissue factor: another view of thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 2311-5.
  • 29 Rauch U. et al. Transfer of tissue factor from leukocytes to platelets ismediated by CD15 and tissue factor. Blood 2000; 96: 170-5.
  • 30 Laskey WK, Gellman J. Inflammatory markers increase following exposure to radiographic contrast media. Acta Radiol 2003; 44: 498-503.
  • 31 Schrader R. Thrombogenic potential of non-ionic contrast media--fact or fiction?. Eur J Radiol 1996; 23 (Suppl. 01) Suppl S10-3.
  • 32 Al Dieri R, Beguin S, Hemker HC. The ionic contrast medium ioxaglate interferes with thrombinmediated feedback activation of factor V, factor VIII and platelets. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1: 269-74.
  • 33 Schrader R. et al. Arandomized trial comparing the impact of a nonionic (Iomeprol) versus an ionic (Ioxaglate) low osmolar contrast medium on abrupt vessel closure and ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 395-402.
  • 34 Bertrand ME. et al. Influence of a nonionic, iso-osmolar contrast medium (iodixanol) versus an ionic, low-osmolar contrast medium (ioxaglate) onmajor adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. VIP Trial Investigators. Circulation 2000; 101: 131-6.
  • 35 Davidson CJ. et al. Randomized trial of contrast media utilization in high-risk PTCA: the COURT trial. Circulation 2000; 101: 2172-7.
  • 36 Scheller B, Hennen B, Pohl A. et al. Acute and subacute stent occlusion; risk-reduction by ionic contrast media. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 385-91.