Semin Hear 2008; 29(2): 212-227
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1075827
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Proposals and Research

Judith S. Gravel1 , Arlene Stredler Brown2 , Anne Marie Tharpe3 , Robert F. Oyler4
  • 1Director, Center for Childhood Communication, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • 2Senior Professional Research Assistant & Lecturer, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
  • 3Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 4Speech-Language Pathologist, The Treatment and Learning Centers, Rockville, Maryland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 May 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

Although questions remain concerning the impact of permanent unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and mild bilateral hearing loss (MBHL) on child development, there is nonetheless evidence that at least some children experience measurable problems, particularly at school age (e.g., grade retention; need for support services). After evidence-supported oral presentations and discussions among clinical experts during the 2005 National Workshop on Mild and Unilateral Hearing Loss, a series of recommendations was developed regarding (1) early identification (hearing screening), (2) audiologic assessment, (3) hearing technologies, and (4) early intervention needs of infants and young children with UHL and MBHL.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Johnson J L, White K R, Widen J E et al.. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.  Pediatrics. 2005;  116 663-672
  • 2 White K R, Johnson J L, Widen J E et al.. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: research design and results of the study.  Am J Audiol. 2005;  14 S186-S189
  • 3 Widen J E, Johnson J L, White K R et al.. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: results of visual reinforcement audiometry.  Am J Audiol. 2005;  14 S200-S216
  • 4 Gravel J S, White K R, Johnson J L et al.. A multisite study to examine the efficacy of the otoacoustic emission/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol: implications for practice, policy and research.  Am J Audiol. 2005;  14 S200-S216
  • 5 Bess F H, Tharpe A M. Case history data on unilaterally hearing-impaired children.  Ear Hear. 1986;  7 14-19
  • 6 Oyler R F, Oyler A L, Matkin N D. Unilateral hearing loss: demographics and educational impact.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1988;  19 201-210
  • 7 Bovo R, Martini A, Agnoletto M et al.. Auditory and academic performance of children with unilateral hearing loss.  Scand Audiol Suppl. 1988;  30 71-74
  • 8 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .Guidelines for Audiologic Screening. Rockville, MD; American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 1997
  • 9 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .Guidelines for Audiologic Assessment of Infants Birth to Five. Rockville, MD; American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2004
  • 10 Kenworthy O T, Klee T, Tharpe A M. Speech recognition ability of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss as a function of amplification, speech stimuli and listening condition.  Ear Hear. 1990;  11 264-270
  • 11 American Academy of Audiology . Pediatric amplification protocol.  Audiology Today. 2004;  16 46-53
  • 12 Haggard R S, Primus M A. Parental perceptions of hearing loss classification in children.  Am J Audiol. 1999;  8 83-92
  • 13 White K R, Vohr B R, Maxon A B et al.. Screening all newborns for hearing loss using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1994;  29 203-217
  • 14 Bess F H, Tharpe A M. Performance and management of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.  Scand Audiol. 1988;  30(Suppl) 75-79
  • 15 Bess F H, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker R A. Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status.  Ear Hear. 1998;  19 339-354
  • 16 Blair J, Peterson M, Viehweg S. The effects of mild hearing loss on academic performance of young school-age children.  Volta Rev. 1985;  87 87-93
  • 17 Brookhouser P E, Worthington D W, Kelly W J. Unilateral hearing loss in children.  Laryngoscope. 1991;  101 1264-1272
  • 18 Culbertson J L, Gilbert L E. Children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: cognitive, academic, and social development.  Ear Hear. 1986;  7 38-42
  • 19 Davis A, Reeve K, Hind S BJ. Children with mild and unilateral hearing loss. In: Seewald R, Gravel J A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification. Proceedings of the Second International Conference Bury St. Edmunds, UK; St. Edmundsbury Press 2001: 179-186
  • 20 Davis J M, Elfenbein J, Schum R et al.. Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1986;  51 53-62
  • 21 Klee T M, Davis-Dansky E. A comparison of unilaterally hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing children on a battery of standardized language tests.  Ear Hear. 1986;  7 27-37
  • 22 Lieu J E. Speech-language and educational consequences of unilateral hearing loss in children.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;  130 524-530
  • 23 Moeller M P. Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing.  Pediatrics. 2000;  106 E43
  • 24 Oyler R F, Oyler A L, Matkin N D. Warning: a unilateral hearing loss may be detrimental to a child's academic career.  Hearing J. 1987;  18-22
  • 25 Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey A L, Coulter D K et al.. The language of early-and later-identified children with hearing loss.  Pediatrics. 1998;  102 1161-1171
  • 26 Bess F H, Klee T, Culbertson J L. Identification, assessment, and management of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.  Ear Hear. 1986;  7 43-50
  • 27 Bess F H, Tharpe A M, Gibler A. Auditory performance of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing impairment.  Ear Hear. 1986;  7 20-26
  • 28 Dunst C. Rethinking early intervention.  Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities. 1985;  5 165-201
  • 29 Jones E A. Partnering with families: a clinical training manual. Boulder, CO; unpublished manuscript 1993

1 For the purposes of the 2005 national workshop, the following definitions were adopted: MBHL was defined as a calculated or predicted average pure-tone air-conduction threshold at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz between 20 and 40 dB hearing level (HL) (American National Standards Institute, 1996[4]) or pure-tone air-conduction thresholds greater than 25 dB HL at two or more frequencies above 2000 Hz (i.e., 3000, 4000, 6000, 8000 Hz) in both ears. UHL was defined as a calculated or predicted average pure-tone air-conduction threshold at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz of any level greater than or equal to 20 dB HL or pure-tone air-conduction thresholds greater than 25 dB hearing loss at two or more frequencies above 2000 Hz in the affected ear with an average pure-tone air-conduction threshold in the good ear less than or equal to 15 dB HL (definitions were adapted from Bess et al[15]).

Judith S GravelPh.D. 

Director, Center for Childhood Communication

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, CSH 113, Philadelphia, PA 19104

Email: gravel@email.chop.edu