Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2007; 116(12): 607-614
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1021796
Fortbildung
Neue Technologien
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Neues selbsthärtendes, selbstätzendes Komposit-Befestigungsmaterial - Adhäsiv-System mit sehr guter In-vitro- und In-vivo-Performance

U. Salz1 , G. Arnetzl2
  • 1Forschung & Entwicklung Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein
  • 2Medizinische-Universität Graz, Universitätsklinik für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Graz, Österreich
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 January 2008 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Für die adhäsive Befestigung von indirekten Keramik-, Metall- oder Komposit-Restaurationen werden meist Befestigungsmaterialien wie Hybridglasionomere oder Komposit-Befestigungsmaterialien eingesetzt [1]. Während sich Glasionomere durch selbsthaftende Eigenschaften auszeichnen, besitzen Komposit-Befestigungsmaterialien bessere mechanische Eigenschaften, wie Abrasionsresistenz etc., weshalb sie bevorzugt verwendet werden [2]. Mit der Ausnahme von sogenannten selbsthaftenden Kompositmaterialien wie z.B. RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Deutschland) erfordert die Anwendung von Komposit-Befestigungsmaterialien die zusätzliche Applikation eines Dentin-/Schmelz-Adhäsivs.

Literatur

  • 1 Kraemer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R.. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.  Am J Dent. 2000;  13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR.. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics.  J Prosthet Dent. 1999;  81 135-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Buonocore MG.. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces.  J Dent Res. 1955;  34 849-853
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Reis AF, Oliveira MT, Giannini M, De Goes MF, Rueggeberg FA.. The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives' bond strength to enamel and dentin.  Oper Dent. 2003;  28 700-706
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH.. The overwet phenomenon in two-component acetone-based primers containing aryl amine and carboxylic acid monomers.  Dent Mater. 1997;  13 118-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Frankenberger R, Kraemer N, Petschelt A.. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation.  Oper Dent. 2000;  25 324-330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Christensen GJ.. Solving the frustrations of crown cementation.  J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;  133 1121-1122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.  Oper Dent. 2003;  28 215-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sensat ML, Brackett WW, Meinberg TA, Beatty MW.. Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity.  J Prosthet Dent. 2002;  88 50-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Stansbury JW.. Curing dental resins and composites by photopolymerization.  J Esthet Dent. 2000;  12 300-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Toledano M, Tay FR.. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems.  Oper Dent. 2003;  28 747-755
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Suh B, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR.. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers.  J Adhes Dent. 2003;  5 267-282
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gross A.. Kunststoffe in der Zahnmedizin.  Chem i. u. Z. 1979;  13 142-146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Imoto M, Choe S.. Vinyl Polymerization. V.Decomposition of sym-substituted benzoyl peroxides in presence of dimethylanilide.  J Polym Sci. 1955;  15 485-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nishiyama N, Suzuki K, Yoshida H, Teshima H, Nemoto K.. Hydrolytic stability of methacrylamide in acidic aqueous solution.  Biomaterials. 2004;  25 965-969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Salz U, Zimmermann J, Zeuner F, Moszner N.. Hydrolytical stability of self-etching adhesive systems.  J Adhes Dent. 2005;  7 107-116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Salz U, Zimmermann J, Zeuner F, Moszner N.. Hydrolytically stable monomers for self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives.  Polymer Preprints. 2004;  45 325-326
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ.. Effect of primer solvent, primer agitation, and dentin dryness on shear bond strength to dentin.  Am J Dent. 1998;  11 225-228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Miyazaki M, Hinoura K, Honjo G, Onose H.. Effect of self-etching primer application method on enamel bond strength.  Am J Dent. 2002;  15 412-416
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Salz U, Zimmermann J, Salzer T.. Self-curing, self-etching adhesive cement systems.  J Adhes Dent. 2005;  7 7-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL.. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration.  J Dent Res. 1987;  66 1636-1639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jessop NT.. Testing shear bond strength. US 6324916 Ultradent Products Inc 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Dental materials - testing of adhesion to tooth structure. 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F.. The microtensile bond test: a review.  J Adhes Dent. 1999;  1 299-309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Salz U, Duarte Jr S, Zimmermann J, Lopes MM, Perdigao J.. Bond strengths of self-cured, self-etching resin cements.  J Dent Res. 2004;  83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Prati C, Simpson M, Mitchem J, Tao L, Pashley DH.. Relationship between bond strength and microleakage measured in the same class I restorations.  Dent Mater. 1992;  8 37-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russel CM.. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage at the dentin/restoration interface.  Am J Dent. 1994;  7 44-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J, Pashley DH.. Relationship between bond strength and nanoleakage: Evaluation of a new assessment method.  Am J Dent. 2001;  14 100-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E.. The promotion of adhesion by infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates.  J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;  16 265-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Van Meerbeek M B. Vargas, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G.. Microscopy investigations. Technique, results, limitations.  Am J Dent. 2000;  13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Perdigao J.. Development report on Multilink. 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Roulet JF, Hirt T, Lutz F.. Surface roughness and marginal behaviour of experimental and commercial composites: an in vitro study.  J Oral Rehabil. 1984;  11 499-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Korrespondenzadresse

Ulrich Salz

Forschung & Entwicklung Ivoclar Vivadent AG

Bendererstraße 2

Schaan FL 9494, Liechtenstein

Email: Ulrich.salz@ivoclarvivadent.com

      >