Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2005; 9(2): 105-115
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-872336
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA.

Controversies in Cervical Spine Imaging in Trauma Patients

Richard H. Daffner1
  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 July 2005 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The subject of cervical spine imaging for trauma patients has generated significant controversy over the past decade and a half. This review considers three aspects of this controversy. The first examines the indications for cervical imaging, focusing on the factors that determine whether trauma patients are at high or low risk for cervical injury. The second discusses the uses of radiography and computed tomography as the main screening diagnostic examination. In addition to the roles of each modality in this evaluation process, other factors such as efficacy of diagnosis, time requirements for study, and cost will be discussed. The final section explores the methods currently used to “clear” the cervical spine in comatose patients.

KEYWORDS

Cervical spine - trauma - imaging indications - radiography indications - efficacy - cost - computed tomography - indications - dose

REFERENCES

  • 1 Stiell I G, Greenberg G H, McKnight R D et al.. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.  JAMA. 1993;  269 1127-1132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Stiell I G, Greenberg G H, Wells G A et al.. Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries.  Ann Emerg Med. 1995;  26 405-413
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mirvis S E, Diaconis J N, Chirico P A, Reiner B I, Joslyn J N, Militello P. Protocol-driven radiologic evaluation of suspected cervical spine injury: efficiency study.  Radiology. 1989;  170 831-834
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vandemark R M. Radiology of the cervical spine in trauma patients: practice pitfalls and recommendations for improving efficiency and communication.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;  155 465-472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hanson J A, Blackmore C C, Mann F A, Wilson A J. Cervical spine injury: a clinical decision rule to identify high-risk patients for helical CT screening.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;  174 713-717
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hoffman J R, Mower W R, Wolfson A B, Todd K H, Zucker M I. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  343 94-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stiell I G, Wells G A, Vandemheen K L et al.. The Canadian c-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients.  JAMA. 2001;  286 1841-1848
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Daffner R H, Brown R R, Goldberg A L. A new classification for cervical vertebral injuries: influence of CT.  Skeletal Radiol. 2000;  29 125-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 American College of Radiology Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging .ACR Appropriateness Criteria for Suspected Cervical Spine Trauma Reston, VA; American College of Radiology 2003
  • 10 Nuñez Jr D B, Ahmad A A, Coin G C et al.. Clearing the cervical spine in multiple trauma victims: a time-effective protocol using helical CT.  Emerg Radiol. 1994;  1 273-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nuñez Jr D B, Zuluaga A, Fuentes-Bernardo D A, Rivas L A, Becerra J L. Cervical spine trauma: how much more do we learn by routinely using helical CT?.  Radiographics. 1996;  16 1307-1318
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Blackmore C C, Ramsey S T, Mann F A, Deyo R A. Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis.  Radiology. 1999;  212 117-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Berne J D, Velmahos G C, El-Tawil Q et al.. Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries: a prospective study.  J Trauma. 1999;  47 896-903
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lawrason J N, Novelline R A, Rhea J T, Sacknoff R, Kihiczak D, Ptak T. Can CT eliminate the initial portable lateral cervical spine radiograph in the multiple trauma patient? A review of 200 cases.  Emerg Radiol. 2001;  8 272-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Li A E, Fishman E K. Cervical spine trauma: evaluation by multidetector CT and three-dimensional volume rendering.  Emerg Radiol. 2003;  10 34-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ptak T, Kihiczak D, Lawrason J N. Screening for cervical spine trauma with helical CT: experience with 676 cases.  Emerg Radiol. 2001;  8 315-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Daffner R H, Sciulli R, Rodriguez A. Cervical CT vs. radiography for cervical spine trauma screening. A two-year experience. Presented at The American Roentgen Ray Society, Annual Meeting May 19, 2005 New Orleans, LA;
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Daffner R H. Cervical radiography for trauma patients: a time-effective technique?.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;  175 1309-1311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Daffner R H. Cervical helical CT for trauma patients: a time analysis.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;  177 677-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Saini S, Seltzer S E, Bramson R T. Technical cost of radiologic examinations: analysis across imaging modalities.  Radiology. 2000;  216 269-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Forman H P. Cost value, and price: what is the difference and why care?.  Radiology. 2001;  218 25-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Saini S, Sharma R, Levine L A, Barmson R T, Jordan P F, Thrall J H. Technical cost of CT examinations.  Radiology. 2001;  218 172-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rybicki F, Nawfel R D, Judy P F et al.. Skin and thyroid dosimetry in cervical spine screening: two methods for evaluation and a comparison between a helical CT and radiographic trauma series.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;  179 933-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Abel M S. Occult Traumatic Lesions of the Cervical Vertebrae St. Louis; Warren H. Green, Inc 1971
  • 25 Pollack Jr C V, Hendey G W, Martin D R. Use of flexion-extension radiographs of the cervical spine in blunt trauma.  Ann Emerg Med. 2001;  38 8-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Brady W J, Moghtader J, Cutcher D, Exline C. Young. ED use of flexion-extension cervical spine radiography in the evaluation of blunt trauma.  Am J Emerg Med. 1999;  17 504-508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dwek J R, Chung C B. Radiography of cervical spine injury in children: are flexion-extension radiographs useful for acute trauma?.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;  174 1617-1619
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Davis J W, Parks S N, Detlefs C L et al.. Clearing the cervical spine in obtunded patients: the use of dynamic fluoroscopy.  J Trauma. 1995;  39 435-438
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sees D W, Cruz L RR, Flaherty S F. The use of bedside fluoroscopy to evaluate the cervical spine in obtunded trauma patients.  J Trauma. 1998;  45 768-771
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Davis J W, Kaups K L, Cunningham M A. Routine evaluation of the cervical spine in head-injured patients with dynamic fluoroscopy: a reappraisal.  J Trauma. 2001;  50 1044-1047
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Griffiths H J, Wagner J, Anglen J, Bunn P, Metzler M. The use of forced flexion/extension views in the obtunded trauma patient.  Skeletal Radiol. 2002;  31 587-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Richard DaffnerM.D. 

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Allegheny General Hospital

320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212-4772

      >