Semin Neurol 2005; 25(2): 196-203
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-871328
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Electrodiagnosis in Common Mononeuropathies and Plexopathies

Devanand Jillapalli1 , Jeremy M. Shefner1
  • 1Department of Neurology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 June 2005 (online)

ABSTRACT

Electrodiagnosis has a prominent role in the diagnosis of common entrapment neuropathies (carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar neuropathy at the elbow) and plexopathies (idiopathic brachial plexopathy and diabetic lumbar radiculoplexopathy). The relevant anatomy and pathology of these disorders is reviewed in the context of electrodiagnosis and prognosis.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Cornblath D R, Sumner A J, Daube J et al.. Conduction block in clinical practice.  Muscle Nerve. 1991;  14 869-871
  • 2 Rhee E K, England J D, Sumner A J. A computer simulation of conduction block: effects produced by actual block versus interphase cancellation.  Ann Neurol. 1990;  28 146-156
  • 3 Kimura J. Facts, fallacies and fantasies of nerve conduction studies: twenty-first annual Edward H. Lambert lecture.  Muscle Nerve. 1997;  20 777-787
  • 4 Seddon H J. Three types of nerve injury.  Brain. 1943;  66 237-288
  • 5 Chaudhry V, Cornblath D R. Wallerian degeneration in human nerves: serial electrophysiological studies.  Muscle Nerve. 1992;  15 687-693
  • 6 Jablecki C K, Andary M T, Floeter M K et al.. Practice parameter: Electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome.  Neurology. 2002;  58 1589-1592
  • 7 Jablecki C K, Andary M T, Yuen T et al.. Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.  Muscle Nerve. 1993;  16 1392-1414
  • 8 Kimura I, Ayyar D R. The carpal tunnel syndrome: electrophysiological aspects of 639 symptomatic extremities.  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985;  25 151-164
  • 9 Thomas J E, Lambert E H, Cseuz K A. Electrodiagnostic aspects of carpal tunnel syndrome.  Arch Neurol. 1967;  16 635-641
  • 10 Concannon M J, Gainor B, Petroski G et al.. The predictive value of electrodiagnostic studies in Carpal tunnel syndrome.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100 1452-1458
  • 11 Tackmann W, Kaeser H E, Magun H G. Comparison of orthodromic and antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity measurements in the carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Neurol. 1981;  224 257-266
  • 12 Kimura J. A method for determining median nerve conduction velocity across the carpal tunnel.  J Neurol Sci. 1978;  38 1-10
  • 13 Kaul M P, Pagel K J. Value of lumbrical-interosseous technique in carpal tunnel syndrome.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;  81 691-695
  • 14 Preston D C, Logigian E L. Lumbrical and interossei recording in carpal tunnel syndrome.  Muscle Nerve. 1992;  15 1253-1257
  • 15 Uncini A, Lange D J, Solomon M et al.. Ring finger testing in carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparative study of diagnostic utility.  Muscle Nerve. 1989;  12 735-741
  • 16 Buschbacher R. Mixed nerve conduction studies of the median and ulnar nerves.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;  78 S69-S74
  • 17 Johnson E W, Sipski M, Lammertse T. Median and radial sensory latencies to digit 1: Normal values and usefulness in carpal tunnel syndrome.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;  68 140-141
  • 18 Preston D C. Distal median neuropathies.  Neurol Clin. 1999;  17 407-424
  • 19 Cioni R, Passero S, Paradiso C et al.. Diagnostic specificity of sensory and motor nerve conduction variables in early detection of carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Neurol. 1989;  236 208-213
  • 20 Amoiridis G. Median-ulnar nerve communications and anomalous innervation of the intrinsic hand muscles: an electrophysiological study.  Muscle Nerve. 1992;  15 576-579
  • 21 Uchida Y, Sugioka Y. Electrodiagnosis of Martin-Gruber connection and its clinical importance in peripheral nerve surgery.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1992;  17 54-59
  • 22 Gutmann L, Gutierrez A, Riggs J. The contribution of median-ulnar communications in the diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome.  Muscle Nerve. 1986;  9 319-321
  • 23 Preston D C, Shapiro B E. Anomalous innervations. In: Preston DC, Shapiro BE Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders: Clinical-Electrophysiologic Correlations. Newton, MA; Butterworth-Heinemann 1998: 77-83
  • 24 Moore J S. The occupational medicine physician’s view of proximal ulnar neuropathies: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and work relatedness. AAEM Plenary session: Broadening our view of compressive neuropathies: a 360 degree approach to the ulnar nerve. Toronto, Canada. 2002: 1-12
  • 25 Campbell W W, Pridgeon R M, Riaz G et al.. Variations in anatomy of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel: pitfalls in the diagnosis of the ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.  Muscle Nerve. 1991;  14 733-738
  • 26 Anonymous. Practice parameter: electrodiagnostic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.  Neurology. 1999;  52 688-690
  • 27 Campbell W W. Electrophysiological approaches to the diagnosis and assessment of ulnar neuropathy: a historical and literature. AAEM Plenary session: Broadening our view of compressive neuropathies: a 360 degree approach to the ulnar nerve. Toronto, Canada. 2002: 13-21
  • 28 Childress H M. Recurrent ulnar nerve dislocation at the elbow.  Clin Orthop. 1975;  108 168-173
  • 29 Tackmann W, Vogel P, Kaeser H E et al.. Sensitivity and localizing significance of motor and sensory electroneurographic parameters in the diagnosis of ulnar nerve lesions at the elbow.  J Neurol. 1984;  231 204-211
  • 30 Raynor E M, Shefner J M, Preston D C et al.. Sensory and mixed nerve conduction studies in the evaluation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.  Muscle Nerve. 1994;  17 785-792
  • 31 Jillapalli D, Bradshaw D Y, Shefner J M. Motor unit number estimation in Focal Conduction Block.  Muscle Nerve. 2003;  27 676-681
  • 32 Campbell W W, Pridgeon R M, Riaz G et al.. Sparing of the flexor carpi ulnaris in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.  Muscle Nerve. 1989;  12 965-967
  • 33 Stewart J D. The variable clinical manifestation of ulnar neuropathies at the elbow.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987;  50 252-258
  • 34 Venkatesh S, Kothari M J, Preston D C. The limitations of the dorsal ulnar cutaneous sensory response in patients with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.  Muscle Nerve. 1995;  18 345-347
  • 35 Botte M J, Cohen M S, Lavernia C J et al.. The dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve: an anatomic study.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1990;  15 603-607
  • 36 Parsonage M J, Turner J W. Neuralgic amyotrophy: the shoulder girdle syndrome.  Lancet. 1948;  1 973-978
  • 37 Wilbourn A J. Brachial plexopathy. In: Katirji B, Kaminski HJ, Preston DC, et al Neuromuscular Disorders in Clinical Practice. Woburn, MA; Butterworth-Heinemann 2002: 884-906
  • 38 England J D, Sumner A J. Neuralgic amyotrophy: an increasingly diverse entity.  Muscle Nerve. 1987;  10 60-68
  • 39 Bromberg M B, Jaros L. Symmetry of normal motor and sensory nerve conduction measurements.  Muscle Nerve. 1998;  21 498-503
  • 40 Olney R K. AAEM minimonograph #38: neuropathies in connective tissue disease.  Muscle Nerve. 1992;  15 531-542
  • 41 Ferrante M A, Wilbourn A J. The utility of various sensory conduction responses in assessing brachial plexopathies.  Muscle Nerve. 1995;  18 879-889
  • 42 Ferrante M A, Wilbourn A J. Electrodiagnostic approach to the patient with suspected brachial plexopathy.  Neurol Clin. 2002;  20 423-450
  • 43 Kimura I, Ayyar D R. Sensory nerve conduction study in the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve.  Tohoku J Exp Med. 1984;  142 461-466
  • 44 Seror P. The medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve: antidromic and orthodromic conduction studies.  Muscle Nerve. 2002;  26 421-423
  • 45 Buschbacher R, Koch J, Emsley C et al.. Electrodiagnostic reference values for the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve: standardization of a 10 cm distance.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;  81 1563-1566
  • 46 Lambert E H. Diagnostic value of electrical stimulation of motor nerves.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1962;  22 9-16
  • 47 Wilbourn A J, Aminoff M J. AAEE minimonograph #32: the electrophysiologic examination in patients with radiculopathies.  Muscle Nerve. 1988;  11 1099-1114
  • 48 Tsairis P, Dyck P J, Mulder D W. Natural history of brachial plexus neuropathy: report on 99 cases.  Arch Neurol. 1972;  27 109-117
  • 49 Watson B V, Nicolle M W, Brown J D. Conduction block in neuralgic amyotrophy.  Muscle Nerve. 2001;  24 559-563
  • 50 Garland H. Diabetic amyotrophy.  BMJ. 1955;  2 1287-1290
  • 51 Garland H. Diabetic amyotrophy.  Br J Clin Pract. 1961;  15 9-13
  • 52 Locke S, Lawrence D G, Legg M A. Diabetic amyotrophy.  Am J Med. 1963;  34 775-785
  • 53 Chokroverty S, Reyes M G, Rubino F A et al.. The syndrome of diabetic amyotrophy.  Ann Neurol. 1977;  2 181-194
  • 54 Preston D C, Shapiro B E. Lumbosacral plexopathy. In: Preston DC, Shapiro BE Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders: Clinical-Electrophysiologic Correlations Newton, MA; Butterworth-Heinemann 1998: 471-489
  • 55 Wainapel S F, Kim D J, Ebel A. Conduction studies of the saphenous nerve in healthy subjects.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1978;  59 316-319
  • 56 Said G, Goulon-Goeau C, Lacroix C et al.. Nerve biopsy findings in different patterns of proximal diabetic neuropathy.  Ann Neurol. 1994;  35 559-569
  • 57 Williams I R, Mayer R F. Subacute proximal diabetic neuropathy.  Neurology. 1976;  26 108-116
  • 58 Date E S, Mar E Y, Bugola M R et al.. The prevalence of lumbar paraspinal spontaneous activity in asymptomatic subjects.  Muscle Nerve. 1996;  19 350-354

Devanand JillapalliM.D. 

Department of Neurology, Upstate Medical University, 750 E

Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210

    >