Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2001; 19(3): 279-290
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-18047
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Cost-effectiveness of In Vitro Fertilization

John Collins
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 October 2001 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is an effective but underutilized treatment for long-standing infertility. The median projected cost per IVF cycle in 2001 in the United States would be $9226 and $3531 in 25 other countries, based on previously published estimates. The cost per delivery arising from IVF cycles in 2001 in the United States would average $56,419, and $20,522 in eight other countries, based on previously published estimates. The cost-effectiveness of IVF has not been proven in three randomized controlled trials, but these trials are difficult to design and implement. Multiple gestation births significantly increase the cost of IVF treatment. IVF multiple births cost 36% more than the IVF cycles that gave rise to the multiple births. The uptake of IVF in most countries falls short of the minimum 1500 cycles per annum that would be needed per million population. Comparative international data indicate that infertile couples would increase their uptake of IVF services if the price were lower.

KEYWORD

In vitro fertilization - cost-effectiveness - economic analysis - utilization

REFERENCES

  • 1 U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Infertility: Medical and Social Choices Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1988
  • 2 Neumann P J, Weinstein M C, Gharib S D. The cost of a successful delivery with in vitro fertilization.  N Engl J Med . 1994;  331 239-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chandra A, Stephen E H. Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982-1995.  Fam Plann Perspect . 1998;  30 34-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1997 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  74 641-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Stovall D W, Allen B D, Sparks A ET, Syrop C H, Saunders R G, van Voorhis J B. The cost of infertility evaluation and therapy: findings of a self-insured university healthcare plan.  Fertil Steril . 1999;  72 778-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Giacomini M, Hurley J, Stoddart G. The many meanings of deinsuring a health service: the case of in vitro fertilization in Ontario.  Soc Sci Med . 2000;  50 1485-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Byford S, Raftery J. Perspectives in economic evaluation.  BMJ . 1998;  316 1529-1530
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Goldfarb J M, Austin C, Lisbona H, Peskin B, Clapp M. Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization.  Obstet Gynecol . 1996;  87 18-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 van Voorhis J B, Syrop C H, Allen B D, Sparks A ET, Stovall D W. The efficacy and cost effectiveness of embryo cryopreservation compared with other assisted reproductive techniques.  Fertil Steril . 1995;  64 647-650
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Trad F S, Hornstein M D, Barbieri R L. In vitro fertilization: a cost-effective alternative for infertile couples?.  J Assist Reprod Genet . 1995;  12 418-421
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Collins J A, Bustillo M, Visscher R D, Lawrence L D. An estimate of the cost of in vitro fertilization services in the United States in 1995.  Fertil Steril . 1995;  64 538-545
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 U.S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1997; 117, Table No. 169. Consumer Price Indexes of Medical Care Prices: 1980 to 1996. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority; 1997
  • 13 Blumenthal D. Controlling health care expenditures.  N Engl J Med . 2001;  344 766-769
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fluker M R, Tiffin G J. Assisted reproductive technologies: a primer for Canadian physicians.  J Soc Obstet Gynecol Can . 1996;  18 451-465
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Goverde A J, McDonnell J, Vermeiden J PW, Schats R, Rutten F FH, Schoemaker J. Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility.  Lancet . 2000;  355 13-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Granberg M, Wikland M, Hamberger L. Financing of IVF/ET in the Nordic countries.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . 1998;  77 63-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Haan G, van Steen R. Costs in relation to effects of in-vitro fertilization.  Hum Reprod . 1992;  7 982-986
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Holst N, Maltau J M, Forsdahl F, Hansen L J. Handling of tubal infertility after introduction of in vitro fertilization: changes and consequences.  Fertil Steril . 1991;  55 140-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mantovani L G, Belisari A, Szymanski L M. Pharmaco-economic aspects of in-vitro fertilization in Italy.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 953-958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Philips Z, Barraza-Llorens M, Posnett J. Evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for infertility in the UK.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 95-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Schenker J, Shushan A. Ethical and legal aspects of assisted reproduction practice in Asia.  Hum Reprod . 1996;  11 908-911
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pavlovich C P, Schlegel P N. Fertility options after vasectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.  Fertil Steril . 1997;  67 133-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Karande V C, Korn A, Morris R. Prospective randomized trial comparing the outcome and cost of in vitro fertilization with that of a traditional treatment algorithm as first-line therapy for couples with infertility.  Fertil Steril . 1999;  71 468-475
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Palmer S, Byford S, Raftery J. Types of economic evaluation.  BMJ . 1999;  318 1349
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gafni A. Willingness-to-pay as a measure of benefits.  Med Care . 1991;  29 1246-1252
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Granberg M, Wikland M, Nilsson L, Hamberger L. Couples' willingness to pay for IVF-ET.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . 1995;  74 199-202
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Neumann P J, Johannesson M. The willingness to pay for in vitro fertilization: a pilot study using contingent evaluation.  Med Care . 1994;  32 686-699
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ryan M. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation.  Soc Sci Med . 1999;  48 535-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ganiats T G, Browner D K, Kaplan R M. Comparison of two methods of calculating quality-adjusted life years.  Qual Life Res . 1996;  5 162-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Torgerson D, Raftery J. Economic notes: measuring outcomes in economic evaluations.  BMJ . 1999;  318 1413
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 O'Brien B J, Heyland D, Richardson W S, Levine M, Drummond M F. Users' guides to the medical literature XIII: how to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients?.  <~>Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA . 2001;  277 1802-1806
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Soliman S, Daya S, Collins J, Jarrell J F. A randomized trial of in vitro fertilization versus conventional treatment for infertility.  Fertil Steril . 1993;  59 1239-1244
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Goeree R, Labelle R, Jarrell J F. Cost-effectiveness of an in-vitro fertilization program and the costs of associated hospitalizations and other infertility treatments. In: Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies, ed. Proceed with Care: Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services 1993: 569-599
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Meldrum D R, Silverberg K M, Bustillo M, Stokes L. Success rate with repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.  Fertil Steril . 1998;  69 1005-1009
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Guidelines to the prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and management of infertility, 1996.  Hum Reprod . 1996;  11 1775-1807
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Collins J A, Feeny D, Gunby J. The cost of infertility diagnosis and treatment in Canada in 1995.  Hum Reprod . 1997;  12 951-958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Mol B WJ, Bonsel G J, Collins J A, Wiegerinck M H M A, van der Veen F, Bossuyt P MM. Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  73 748-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Callahan T L, Hall J E, Ettner S L, Christiansen C L, Greene M F, Crowley W F. The economic impact of multiple gestation pregnancies and the contribution of assisted reproduction.  N Engl J Med . 1994;  331 244-249
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Jarrell J F, Labelle R, Goeree R, Milner R, Collins J. A randomized controlled trial of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.  Online J Curr Clin Trials . 1993;  Jul 2 DocNo.73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Health Council of the Netherlands: Committee on in vitro fertilization (IVF). In Vitro Fertilization Rijswijk: Health Council of the Netherlands; 1997
  • 41 Lynch A, McDuffie R, Murphy J, Faber K, Leff M, Orleans M. Assisted reproductive interventions and multiple birth.  Obstet Gynecol . 2001;  97 195-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Contribution of assisted reproductive technology and ovulation-inducing drugs to triplet and higher-order multiple births: United States 1980-1997.  MMWR . 2000;  49 535-538
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Papiernik E. Social cost of twin births.  Acta Genet Med Gemellol . 1983;  32 105-111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Papiernik E. Costs of multiple pregnancies. In: Harvey D, Bryan E, eds. The Stress of Multiple Births London: Multiple Births Foundation 1991: 22-34
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Collins J A, Graves G R. The economic consequences of multiple gestation pregnancy in assisted conception cycles.  Human Fertility . 2000;  3 275-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Social determinants of human reproduction.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 1518-1526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Sundby J, Mboge R, Sonko S. Infertility in the Gambia: frequency and health care seeking.  Soc Sci Med . 1998;  46 891-899
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Zarger A H, Wani A I, Masoodi S R, Laway B A, Salahuddin M. Epidemiologic and etiologic aspects of primary infertility in the Kashmir region of India.  Fertil Steril . 1997;  68 637-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Templeton A, Fraser C, Thompson B. The epidemiology of infertility in Aberdeen.  BMJ . 1990;  301 148-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Schmidt L, Munster K. Infertility, involuntary infecundity, and seeking of medical assistance in industrialized countries: a review of concepts, measurements and results.  Hum Reprod . 1995;  10 1407-1418
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Olsen J, Kuppers-Chinnow M, Spinelli A. Seeking medical help for subfecundity: a study based upon surveys in five European countries.  Fertil Steril . 1996;  66 95-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 de Mouzon J, Lancaster P. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization preliminary data for 1995.  J Assist Reprod Genet . 1997;  14 251S-265S
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 EIM Programme. Registers on IVF treatment in Europe 1999.  Focus on Reproduction . 1999;  3 9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 World Health Organization. World Health Statistics Annual Geneva: WHO 1995: B-625
  • 55 Daya S, Gunby J, Hughes E G, Collins J A, Sagle M A, YoungLai E V. Natural cycles for in-vitro fertilization: cost-effectiveness analysis and factors influencing outcome.  Hum Reprod . 1995;  10 1719-1724
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Nargund G, Waterstone J, Bland J M, Philips Z, Parsons J, Campbell S. Cumulative conception and live birth rates in natural (unstimulated) IVF cycles.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 259-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Janssens R M, Lambalk C B, Vermeiden J P, Schats R, Schoemaker J. In-vitro fertilization in a spontaneous cycle: easy, cheap and realistic.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 314-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hyden-Granskog C, Hovatta O. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 2392-2395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >