Trophoblast-Uterine Interactions in the First Days of Implantation: Models for the Study of Implantation Events in the Human

ABSTRACT

The most profound changes in the relationship of the trophoblast to endometrial tissues occur in the first 5 days after the initiation of implantation. Not only have the earliest stages-adhesion and epithelial penetration-never been seen in the human, but also the trophoblastic plate and lacunar stages that follow are not available for modern investigative methods. Studies of appropriately timed endometrium and of trophoblast- and endometrium-derived cell lines have important implications for aspects of implantation. Use of nonhuman primates and other animal models for appropriate stages in implantation could further our understanding of direct trophoblast-uterine interactions. The mechanisms involved in epithelial penetration by infiltration of the syncytial trophoblast into the uterine luminal epithelium could be studied profitably using the marmoset or the ferret. Drawing of the blastocyst into an interstitial location might be investigated in the guinea pig. Formation of trophoblastic lacunae can be investigated in the cynomolgus monkey. By using such animal models of events of implantation in situ, implications concerning the molecules involved in adhesion, penetration of junctional complexes, and uterine vessel invasion that have been derived from in vitro or murine studies may be placed in context.

KEYWORD

endometrium - placenta

REFERENCES

• 1 O'Rahilly R, Müller F. Developmental Stages in Human Embryos.  Publ 637 Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington 1987
• 2 Enders A C. Perspectives on implantation.  Infertil Reprod Med Clin North Am. In press.
• 3 Enders A C, King B F. Development of the human yolk sac. In: Nogales FF, ed. The Human Yolk Sac and Yolk Sac Tumors Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1993: 33-47
• 4 Parr M B, Parr E L. The implantation reaction. In: Wynn RM, Jollie WP, eds. Biology of the Uterus 2nd ed. New York: Plenum 1989: 233-277
• 5 Schlafke S J, Enders A C. Cellular basis of interaction between trophoblast and uterus at implantation.  Biol Reprod . 1975;  12 41-65
• 6 Enders A C, Liu I KM, Mead R A, Welsh A O. Active and passive morphological interactions of trophoblast and endometrium during early implantation. In: Dey SK, ed. Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Periimplantation Processes New York: Springer-Verlag 1995: 168-182
• 7 Bischof P. In vitro models used to study implantation, trophoblast invasion and placentation-a review.  Troph Res . 1997;  10 67-82
• 8 Katz B, Zamir E, Bershadsky A, Kam Z, Yamada K M, Geiger B. Physical state of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure and molecular composition of cell-matrix adhesions.  Mol Biol Cell . 2000;  11 1047-1060
• 9 Ginther O J. Reproductive Biology of the Mare: Basic and Applied Aspects.  Cross Plains, WI: Equine Services; 1992
• 10 Tarantal A F, Laughlin L S, Dieter J. Pregnancy detection by ultrasound and chorionic gonadotropin during the peri-implantation period in the macaque (Macaca fascicularis).  Early Pregnancy Biol Med . 1997;  4 281-290
• 11 Weitlauf H M. Biology of implantation. In: Knobil E, Neill J, eds. The Physiology of Reproduction New York: Raven Press 1988: 231-262
• 12 Enders A C. The implantation chamber, blastocyst and blastocyst imprint of the rat: a scanning electron microscope study.  Anat Rec . 1975;  182 137-150
• 13 Welsh A O. Uterine cell death during implantation and placentation.  Microsc Res Tech . 1993;  25 223-245
• 14 Welsh A O, Enders A C. Chorioallantoic placenta formation in the rat: I. Luminal epithelial cell death and extracellular matrix modifications in the mesometrial region of implantation chambers.  Am J Anat . 1991;  192 215-231
• 15 Welsh A O, Enders A C. Chorioallantoic placenta formation in the rat: III.  Granulated cells invade the uterine luminal epithelium at the time of epithelial cell death. Biol Reprod . 1993;  49 38-57
• 16 Whiting J, Marshall H, Cook M. Multiple spatially specific enhancers are required to reconstruct the pattern of Hox-2.6 gene expression.  Genes Dev . 1991;  5 2048-2059
• 17 Carson D D, Bagchi I, Dey S K. Embryo implantation.  Dev Biol . 2000;  223 217-237
• 18 Chakraborty I, Das S K, Wang J. Developmental expression of the cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 genes in the periimplantation mouse uterus and their differential regulation by the blastocyst and ovarian steroids.  J Mol Endocrinol . 1996;  16 107-122
• 19 Das S K, Paria B C, Dey S K. Molecular signaling in implantation. In: Carson DD, ed. Embryo Implantation: Molecular, Cellular, and Clinical Aspects New York: Springer-Verlag 1999: 92-106
• 20 Hertig A T, Rock J, Adams E D. A description of 34 human ova within the first 17 days of development.  Am J Anat . 1956;  98 435-493
• 21 Enders A C, Lantz K C, Schlafke S. Differentiation of trophoblast of the baboon blastocyst.  Anat Rec . 1989;  225 329-340
• 22 Enders A C, Lopata A. Implantation in the marmoset monkey: expansion of the early implantation site.  Anat Rec . 1999;  256 279-299
• 23 Lopata A, Kohlman D J, Bowes L G, Watkins W B. Culture of marmoset blastocysts on matrigel: a model of differentiation during the implantation period.  Anat Rec . 1995;  241 469-486
• 24 Franek A D, Salamonsen L A, Lopata A. Marmoset monkey trophoblastic tissue growth and matrix metalloproteinase secretion in culture.  J Reprod Fertil . 1999;  117 107-114
• 25 Enders A C, Schlafke S. Implantation in the ferret: epithelial penetration.  Am J Anat . 1972;  133 291-326
• 26 Hoffman L H, Breinan D R, Blaeuer G L. The rabbit as a model for implantation: in vivo and in vitro studies. In: Carson DD, ed. Embryo Implantation: Molecular, Cellular, and Clinical Aspects New York: Springer-Verlag 1999: 151-160
• 27 Lopata A, Niklaus A, Borg J. Studies on marmoset monkey blastocyst implantation in vitro.  Proc Fertil Soc Aust . 1999;  122
• 28 Lopata A, Oliva K, Stanton P G, Robertson D M. Analysis of chorionic gonadotrophin secreted by cultured human blastocysts.  Mol Hum Reprod . 1997;  3 517-521
• 29 Enders A C, Hendrickx A G, Schlafke S. Implantation in the rhesus monkey: initial penetration of endometrium.  Am J Anat . 1983;  167 275-298
• 30 Hertig A T, Rock J. Two human ova of the pre-villous stage, having a developmental age of about seven and nine days respectively.  Contrib Embryol . 1945;  31 65-84
• 31 Enders A C, Schlafke S. Cytological aspects of trophoblast-uterine interaction in early implantation.  Am J Anat . 1969;  125 1-30
• 32 Knoth M, Falck Larsen J. Ultrastructure of a human implantation site.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . 1972;  51 385-393
• 33 Enders A C. Trophoblast differentiation during the transition from trophoblastic plate to lacunar stage of implantation in the rhesus monkey and human.  Am J Anat . 1989;  186 85-98
• 34 Enders A C. Transition from lacunar to villous stage of implantation in the macaque, including establishment of the trophoblastic shell.  Acta Anat . 1995;  152 151-169
• 35 Tarara R, Enders A C, Hendrickx A G. Early implantation and embryonic development of the baboon: stages 5, 6 and 7.  Anat Embryol . 1987;  176 267-275
• 36 Enders A C. Overview of the morphology of implantation in primates. In: Wolf DP, Stouffer RL, Brenner RM, eds. In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer in Primates New York: Springer-Verlag 1993: 145-157
• 37 Enders A C. Cytotrophoblast invasion of the endometrium in the human and macaque early villus stage of implantation.  Troph Res . 1997;  10 83-95
• 38 Vicovac L, Jones C JP, Aplin J D. Trophoblast differentiation during formation of anchoring villi in a model of the early human placenta in vitro.  Placenta . 1995;  16 41-56
• 39 Aplin J D, Haigh T, Jones C JP, Church H J, Vicovac L. Development of cytotrophoblast columns from explanted first-trimester human placental villi: role of fibronectin and integrin α5β1.  Biol Reprod . 1999;  60 828-838
• 40 Enders A C, King B F. Early stages of trophoblastic invasion of the maternal vascular system during implantation in the macaque and baboon.  Am J Anat . 1991;  192 329-346