Advanced Arthritis of the Carpus: Preoperative Planning Practices of 337 Hand Surgeons

Abstract

Background Surgical procedure selection for carpal arthritis depends on which articular surfaces are affected, but there is no consensus on how to preoperatively evaluate cartilage surfaces. Despite advances in cross-sectional imaging, the utility of advanced imaging for preoperative decision-making has not been well established.

Objectives Our objective was to assess if there is an added value to presurgical advanced imaging or diagnostic procedures in planning for carpal arthrodesis or carpectomy and to determine what imaging or diagnostic procedures influence surgical treatment options.

Methods A seven-question survey was sent to 2,400 hand surgeons. Questions assessed which articular surfaces surgeons consider important for decision-making, which imaging modalities surgeons employ, and how often surgeons utilize diagnostic arthroscopy before performing carpectomy or arthrodesis procedures.

Results A total of 337 (14%) surveys were analyzed. The capitolunate articulation (alone or in combination) was most frequently reported to impact surgical decision-making (48.1%). Most surgeons (86.6%) reported that standard plain radiographs are usually sufficient. Few surgeons reported always obtaining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), with 44.2% of surgeons believing that MRI is never useful and 38.4% believing that CT is never useful. Most surgeons (68.2%) reported that they never perform wrist arthroscopy as part of their decision-making process.

Conclusions This study provides information on the decision-making process in the surgical management of carpal arthritis. Given advances in cross-sectional imaging, further studies are needed to determine the utility of MRI and CT for the planning of surgical procedures in the treatment of arthritis of the carpus.

Level of Evidence Level 4.

Keywords

carpal arthritis - arthrodesis - carpectomy - CT - MRI

Publication History

Received: 21 September 2022

Accepted: 30 January 2023

Article published online:
08 May 2023

• References

• 1 Wyrick JD. Proximal row carpectomy and intercarpal arthrodesis for the management of wrist arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003; 11 (04) 277-281
• 2 Campbell CC, Neustein TM, Daly CA, Wagner ER. Surgical treatment of wrist arthritis in young patients. JBJS Rev 2020; 8 (03) e0078
• 3 Danoff J, Cuellar D, Jane O, Strauch R. The management of Kienböck disease: a survey of the ASSH membership. J Wrist Surg 2015; 4 (01) 43-48
• 4 Chahla J, Schon JM, Olleac R. et al. Stage III advanced wrist collapse treatment options: A Cadaveric Study. J Wrist Surg 2016; 5 (04) 265-272
• 5 Bain GI, McGuire DT. Decision making for partial carpal fusions. J Wrist Surg 2012; 1 (02) 103-114
• 6 Neviaser RJ. Proximal row carpectomy for posttraumatic disorders of the carpus. J Hand Surg Am 1983; 8 (03) 301-305
• 7 Green DP. Proximal row carpectomy. Hand Clin 1987; 3 (01) 163-168
• 8 Baylosis BL, McQuiston AS, Bayne CO, Szabo RM, Boutin RD. Pre-operative imaging for surgical decision-making and the frequency of wrist arthrodesis and carpectomy procedures: a scoping review. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52 (02) 143-150
• 9 Logan JS, Warwick D. The treatment of arthritis of the wrist. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B (10) 1303-1308
• 10 Zinberg EM, Chi Y. Proximal row carpectomy versus scaphoid excision and intercarpal arthrodesis: intraoperative assessment and procedure selection. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (06) 1055-1062
• 11 Bayne CO, Boutin RD, Delman C, Shin AY, Szabo RM. IC42-R: Linscheid-Dobyns Excellence in Wrist Instructional Course: Controversies in Wrist Arthrodesis. In: American Society for Surgery of the Hand National Conference; 2021.
• 12 Krakauer JD, Bishop AT, Cooney WP. Surgical treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19 (05) 751-759
• 13 Imbriglia JE, Broudy AS, Hagberg WC, McKernan D. Proximal row carpectomy: clinical evaluation. J Hand Surg Am 1990; 15 (03) 426-430
• 14 Kompoliti E, Prodromou M, Karantanas AH. SLAC and SNAC wrist: the top five things that general radiologists need to know. Tomography 2021; 7 (04) 488-503
• 15 Weber MA, von Stillfried F, Kloth JK, Rehnitz C. Cartilage imaging of the hand and wrist using 3-T MRI. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2012; 16 (02) 71-87
• 16 Brui E, Efimtcev AY, Fokin VA. et al. Deep learning-based fully automatic segmentation of wrist cartilage in MR images. NMR Biomed 2020; 33 (08) e4320
• 17 Sonnow L, Koennecker S, Luketina R. et al. High-resolution flat panel CT versus 3-T MR arthrography of the wrist: initial results in vivo. Eur Radiol 2019; 29 (06) 3233-3240
• 18 Gao F, Wen Z, Dou S, Kan X, Wei S, Ge Y. High-resolution simultaneous multi-slice accelerated turbo spin-echo musculoskeletal imaging: a head-to-head comparison with routine turbo spin-echo imaging. Front Physiol 2021; 12 (December): 759888
• 19 Steadman J, Sripanich Y, Rungprai C, Mills MK, Saltzman CL, Barg A. Comparative assessment of midfoot osteoarthritis diagnostic sensitivity using weightbearing computed tomography vs weightbearing plain radiography. Eur J Radiol 2021; 134: 109419
• 20 Ha AS, Cunningham SX, Leung AS, Favinger JL, Hippe DS. Weightbearing digital tomosynthesis of foot and ankle arthritis: comparison with radiography and simulated weightbearing CT in a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 212 (01) 173-179
• 21 Liu W, Chen Y, Zeng G, Yang T, Ma M, Song W. Individual surgical treatment of stage IV Müller-Weiss disease according to CT/MRI examination: a retrospective study of 12 cases. Front Surg 2022; 9 (March): 694597
• 22 Xie MM, Xia K, Zhang HX. et al. Individual headless compression screws fixed with three-dimensional image processing technology improves fusion rates of isolated talonavicular arthrodesis. J Orthop Surg Res 2017; 12 (01) 1-8
• 23 Demino C, Koesarie K, Smith J, Fowler JR. Ultrasound use by upper extremity surgeons in 2020: a survey of ASSH members. Hand (N Y) 2022:15589447221082170