Semin intervent Radiol 2018; 35(03): 206-214
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660800
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

New Techniques and Devices in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement

Jamie RiChard
1   Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
,
Bartley Thornburg
1   Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 August 2018 (online)

Abstract

Recently, new techniques and devices in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement have emerged that can improve upon the standard procedure. Ultrasound guidance during TIPS with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), placement of controlled expansion (CX) stents, and portal vein recanalization (PVR) via transsplenic access are three techniques with new data supporting their implementation. ICE guidance can improve the technical success of difficult cases, decrease procedure time, and decrease complications such as capsular puncture, hemobilia, and hepatic artery injury. CX stents offer the operator better control over the final portosystemic gradient, which is particularly useful in patients with a high risk of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy. Finally, transsplenic access provides a stable, antegrade route for PVR, which can be used to optimize transplant candidacy as well as treat the sequelae of portal hypertension in patients with portal vein thrombosis. This article will describe the benefits, technical parameters, and patient selection criteria for each of these new techniques.

 
  • References

  • 1 Rösch J, Hanafee WN, Snow H. Transjugular portal venography and radiologic portacaval shunt: an experimental study. Radiology 1969; 92 (05) 1112-1114
  • 2 Tobis JM, Mallery JA, Gessert J. , et al. Intravascular ultrasound cross-sectional arterial imaging before and after balloon angioplasty in vitro. Circulation 1989; 80 (04) 873-882
  • 3 Fang CH, You JH, Lau WY. , et al. Anatomical variations of hepatic veins: three-dimensional computed tomography scans of 200 subjects. World J Surg 2012; 36 (01) 120-124
  • 4 Dariushnia SR, Haskal ZJ, Midia M. , et al; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (01) 1-7
  • 5 Freedman AM, Sanyal AJ, Tisnado J. , et al. Complications of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 1993; 13 (06) 1185-1210
  • 6 Copelan A, Kapoor B, Sands M. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: indications, contraindications, and patient work-up. Semin Intervent Radiol 2014; 31 (03) 235-242
  • 7 Kao SD, Morshedi MM, Narsinh KH. , et al. Intravascular ultrasound in the creation of transhepatic portosystemic shunts reduces needle passes, radiation dose, and procedure time: a retrospective study of a single-institution experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (08) 1148-1153
  • 8 Pillai AK, Andring B, Faulconer N. , et al. Utility of intravascular US-guided portal vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: retrospective comparison with conventional technique in 109 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (08) 1154-1159
  • 9 Gaba RC, Khiatani VL, Knuttinen MG. , et al. Comprehensive review of TIPS technical complications and how to avoid them. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (03) 675-685
  • 10 Gipson MG, Smith MT, Durham JD. , et al. Intravascular US-guided portal vein access: improved procedural metrics during TIPS creation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (08) 1140-1147
  • 11 Casadaban LC, Parvinian A, Minocha J. , et al. Clearing the confusion over hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS creation: incidence, prognostic factors, and clinical outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60 (04) 1059-1066
  • 12 Nardelli S, Gioia S, Pasquale C. , et al. Cognitive impairment predicts the occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111 (04) 523-528
  • 13 Pieper CC, Sprinkart AM, Nadal J. , et al. Postinterventional passive expansion of partially dilated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26 (03) 388-394
  • 14 Madoff DC, Wallace MJ, Ahrar K, Saxon RR. TIPS-related hepatic encephalopathy: management options with novel endovascular techniques. Radiographics 2004; 24 (01) 21-36 , discussion 36–37
  • 15 Pereira K, Carrion AF, Salsamendi J, Doshi M, Baker R, Kably I. Endovascular management of refractory hepatic encephalopathy complication of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): comprehensive review and clinical practice algorithm. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39 (02) 170-182
  • 16 Sze DY, Hwang GL, Kao JS. , et al. Bidirectionally adjustable TIPS reduction by parallel stent and stent-graft deployment. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (11) 1653-1658
  • 17 Quaretti P, Michieletti E, Rossi S. Successful treatment of TIPS-induced hepatic failure with an hourglass stent-graft: a simple new technique for reducing shunt flow. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12 (07) 887-890
  • 18 Praktiknjo M, Lehmann J, Fischer S, Strassburg CP, Meyer C, Trebicka J. Novel diameter controlled expansion TIPS (Viatorr CX) graft reduces readmission compared to regular covered TIPS graft and bare metal graft. J Hepatol 2017; 66: S33-S62
  • 19 Srinivasa RN, Srinivasa RN, Chick JFB, Hage A, Saad WA. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt reduction using the GORE VIATORR controlled expansion endoprosthesis: hemodynamics of reducing an established 10-mm TIPS to 8-mm in diameter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41 (03) 518-521
  • 20 Kelly DA, Summerfield JA. Hemostasis in liver disease. Semin Liver Dis 1987; 7 (03) 182-191
  • 21 Zocco MA, Di Stasio E, De Cristofaro R. , et al. Thrombotic risk factors in patients with liver cirrhosis: correlation with MELD scoring system and portal vein thrombosis development. J Hepatol 2009; 51 (04) 682-689
  • 22 Salem R, Vouche M, Baker T. , et al. Pretransplant portal vein recanalization-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with complete obliterative portal vein thrombosis. Transplantation 2015; 99 (11) 2347-2355
  • 23 Hibi T, Nishida S, Levi DM. , et al. When and why portal vein thrombosis matters in liver transplantation: a critical audit of 174 cases. Ann Surg 2014; 259 (04) 760-766
  • 24 Bauer J, Johnson S, Durham J. , et al. The role of TIPS for portal vein patency in liver transplant patients with portal vein thrombosis. Liver Transpl 2006; 12 (10) 1544-1551
  • 25 Liatsos C, Vlachogiannakos J, Patch D. , et al. Successful recanalization of portal vein thrombosis before liver transplantation using transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Liver Transpl 2001; 7 (05) 453-460
  • 26 Thornburg B, Desai K, Hickey R. , et al. Pretransplantation portal vein recanalization and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for chronic portal vein thrombosis: final analysis of a 61-patient cohort. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (12) 1714-1721.e2
  • 27 Habib A, Desai K, Hickey R. , et al. Portal vein recanalization-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt using the transsplenic approach to achieve transplant candidacy in patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26 (04) 499-506
  • 28 Thornburg B, Desai K, Hickey R. , et al. Portal vein recanalization and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for chronic portal vein thrombosis: technical considerations. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 19 (01) 52-60