Indicators for the Automated Analysis of Drug Prescribing Quality

Abstract:

Irrational and inconsistent drug prescription has considerable impact on morbidity, mortality, health service utilization, and community burden. However, few studies have addressed the methodology of processing the information contained in these drug orders used to study the quality of drug prescriptions and prescriber behavior. We present a comprehensive set of quantitative indicators for the quality of drug prescriptions which can be derived from a drug order. These indicators were constructed using explicit a priori criteria which were previously validated on the basis of scientific data. Automatic computation is straightforward, using a relational database system, such that large sets of prescriptions can be processed with minimal human effort. We illustrate the feasibility and value of this approach by using a large set of 23,000 prescriptions for several diseases, selected from a nationally representative prescriptions database. Our study may result in direct and wide applications in the epidemiology of medical practice and in quality control procedures.

Keywords

Drug Prescription - Quality Control - Automated Assessment - Drug Therapy

• REFERENCES

• 1 Strand LM, Cipolle R, Morley PC. Drug-related problems: their structure and function. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1990; 24: 1093-7.
• 2 Audit Commission. A Prescription for Improvement. Toward More Rational Prescribing in General Practice. London: HMSO; 1994
• 3 Wilcox SM, Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S. Inappropriate drug prescribing for the community-dwelling elderly. JAMA 1994; 272: 292-6.
• 4 Denig P, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM. Do physicians take cost into account when making prescribing decisions?. Pharmacoeconomics 1995; 8: 282-90.
• 5 Armstrong D, Reyburn H, Jones R. A study of general practitioners' reasons for changing their prescribing behaviour. BMJ 1996; 312: 949-52.
• 6 Buetow SA, Sibbald B, Cantrill JA, Halli-well S. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate long term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom, 1980-95: systematic literature review. BMJ 1996; 313: 1371-4.
• 7 Erwin WG. The definition of drug utilization review: statement of issues. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991; 50: 596-9.
• 8 Lipton HL, Berd JA. Drug utilization review in ambulatory settings: state of the science and directions for outcomes research. Med Care 1993; 12: 1069-82.
• 9 Kroenke K, Pinholt EM. Reducing polypharmacy in the elderly: a controlled trial of physician feedback. J Am Geriat Soc 1990; 38: 31-6.
• 10 Rokstad K, Straand J, Fugelli P. Can drug treatment be improved by feedback on prescribing profiles combined with therapeutic recommendations? A prospective controlled trial in general practice. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 1061-8.
• 11 De Zegher I, Venot A, Milstein C, Séné B, de Carolis B, Pizzutilo S. OPADE: Optimization of drug prescription using advanced informatics. Comput Meth Progr Biomed 1994; 45: 131-6.
• 12 Séné B, Venot A, de Zegher I, Milstein C, Strauch G. A general model of drug prescription. Meth Inform Med 1995; 34: 310-7.
• 13 Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Samsa GP. et al. A method for assessing drug therapy appropriateness. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 1045-51.
• 14 Husson C, Mangeot A. Theriaque: Information sur le médicament et aide à la prescription. In: Venot A, Degoulet P. eds. Informatique et Médicament. Paris: Springer-Verlag;
• 15 SAS Institute Inc. S/IS user's Guide Statistics (version 6). Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1990