A Modified Method of Activity-based Costing for Objectively Reducing Cost Drivers in Hospitals

Summary

Objectives: Activity-based costing (ABC) is widely used to precisely allocate indirect costs to medical services. In the ABC method, the indirect cost is divided among the medical services in proportion to the volume of “cost drivers”, for example, labor hours and the number of hours of surgery. However, the workload of data collection of cost drivers can be time-consuming and a considerable burden if there are many cost drivers. The authors aim to develop a method for objectively reducing the cost drivers used in the ABC method.

Methods: In the ABC method, the cost driver is assigned for each activity. We assume that these activities and cost drivers are the best combination. Our method, that is cost driver reduction (CDR), can objectively select surrogates of the cost drivers for each activity in ABC from candidate cost drivers. Concretely, the total indirect cost of an activity is temporarily allocated to the medical services using each candidate of cost drivers. The difference between the costs calculated by each candidate and the proper cost driver used in ABC is calculated to evaluate the similarity by the evaluation function.

Results: We estimated the cost of laboratory tests using our method and revealed that the number of cost drivers could be reduced from seven in the ABC to four. Similarly, the results of cost estimation obtained by our method were as accurate as those calculated using the ABC.

Conclusions: Our method provides two advantages compared to the ABC method: 1) it provides results that are as accurate as those of the ABC method, and 2) it is simpler to perform complicated estimation of hospital costs.

Keywords

Cost accounting system - data collection - activity-based costing - cost driver reduction - cost accuracy

• References

• 1 Koyama W. Lifestyle change improves individual health and lowers healthcare costs. Methods Inf Med 2000; 39: 229-32.
• 2 Baker JJ, Boyd GF. Activity-Based Costing in the Operating Room at Valley View Hospital. J Health Care Financ 1997; 24: 1-9.
• 3 Partovi FY. An analytic hierarchy approach to activity-based costing. Int J Prod Econ 1991; 722: 151-61.
• 4 Edbrooke DL, Stevens VG, Hibbert CL, Mann AJ, Wilson AJ. A new method of accurately identifying costs of individual patients in intensive care: the initial results. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23: 645-50.
• 5 Lisa R, Andreas J, Tommy S, Hans R, Hans A. Clinical Process Analysis and Activity-Based Costing at a Heart Center. J Med Syst 2002; 26: 309-21.
• 6 Chan YCL. Improving hospital cost accounting with activity-based costing. Health Care Manage Rev 1993; 18: 71-7.
• 7 Klose KJ, Bottcher J. Activity based costing in radiology. Radiologe 2002; 42: 369-75.
• 8 Greger RE. Medical office survival. Activity based costing for physicians. Md Med: summer 2000; pp 24-6.
• 9 Ralph H, Ramsey IV. C.P.A. Activity-Based Costing for Hospitals. Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1994; 39: 385-96.
• 10 Suneel U. Activity Cost Analysis: A Tools to Cost Medical Services and Improve Quality of Care. Manag Care Q 2001; 9: 34-41.
• 11 Suneel U. Activity-based costing for hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev 1996; 21: 83-96.
• 12 Glick ND, Blackmore CC, Zelman WN. Extending Simulation Modeling to Activity-Based Costing for Clinical Procedures. J Med Syst 2000; 24: 77-89.
• 13 Robin C. The Rise of Activity-Based Costing - Part Two: When do I need Activity-Based Cost system?. J Cost Manage (fall) 1988; pp 41-8.
• 14 Monteiro E. Integrating health information systems: a critical appraisal. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42: 428-32.
• 15 Ellingsen G, Monteiro E. Big is beautiful: electronic patient records in large Norwegian hospitals 1980s-2001. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (004) 366-70.