Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1988; 01(02): 58-63
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633165
Short Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Dynamic Strain in the Canine Tibia: an in vivo Strain Gauge Analysis

K. J. Matushek
*   From the Department of Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
,
G. Sumner-Smith
*   From the Department of Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
,
J. Schatzker
**   From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Ontario, the Department of Orthopaedics, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
,
T. C. Hearn
***   From the Department of Clinical Studies, Sunnybrook Medical Centre, Toronto, Ontario, the Orthopaedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
,
C. Taves
****   From the Department of Clinical Studies, Sunnybrook Medical Centre, Toronto, Ontario, and the College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
,
I. Hoare
****   From the Department of Clinical Studies, Sunnybrook Medical Centre, Toronto, Ontario, and the College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 February 2018 (online)

Electrical resistance rosette strain gauges were bonded directly to the surface of the midshaft of the tibia in four dogs. In vivo strain recording were obtained using a telemetric system allowing the dog relatively free movement. During the stance phase of walking, the cranial surface was mainly in tension while the caudal surface was mainly in compression. The pattern of strain recorded is consistent with craniocaudal bending superimposed on external torsion at the stifle.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lanyon L E. Mechanical function and bone remodeling. In: Sumner-Smith G. ed. Bone in Clinical Orthopaedics. Toronto: WB Saunders; 1982: 273-304.
  • 2 Bassett C A L. Biologic significance of piezoelectricity. Calcif Tiss Res 1968; 1: 252-72.
  • 3 Evans F G. Methods of studying the biomechanical significance of bone form. Amer J Phys Anthrop 1953; 11: 413-28.
  • 4 Bouvier M, Hylander W L. In vivo bone strain on the dog tibia during locomotion. Acta Anat 1984; 118: 187-92.
  • 5 Daly W R, Mills E J, Hohn R B. In vivo strain analysis of canine long bones and its application to internal fixation. Arch Am Coll Veter Surg 1977; 6: 11-5.
  • 6 Hartman W, Schamhardt H C, Lammertink J L M A, Badoux D M. Bone strain in the unequine tibia. An in vivo strain gauge analysis. Am J Vet Res 1984; 45: 884-8.
  • 7 Lanyon L E, Hampson W G J, Goodship A E, Shah J S. Bone deformation recorded in vivo from strain gauges attached to the human tibial shaft. Acta Orthop Scand 1975; 46: 256-68.
  • 8 Lanyon L E, Bourn S. The influence of mechanical function on the development and remodeling of the tibia. J Bone Jt Surg 1979; 61A: 263-73.
  • 9 Schamhardt H C, Hartman W, Lammertink J L M A, Badoux D M. Bone strain in the equine tibia: Inertia as a cause of the presupport peak. Am J Vet Res 1984; 45: 886-7.
  • 10 Schatzker J, Sumner-Smith G, Hoare J, McBroom R. A telemetric system for the strain gauge determination of strain in bone in vivo . Arch Orthop Traumat Surg 1980; 96: 309-11.
  • 11 Turner A S, Mills E J, Gabel A A. In vivo measurements of bone strain in the horse. Am J Vet Res 1975; 36: 1573-5.
  • 12 Pratt Jr G W, O’Connor Jr J T. Force plate studies of equine biomechanics. Am J Vet Res 1976; 37: 1251-5.
  • 13 Rohrle H, Scholten R, Sigolotto C, Sollbach W. Joint forces in the human pelvis-leg skeleton during walking. J Biomech 1984; 17: 409-24.