Download PDF
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere 2003; 31(03): 151-157
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1623022
Schwein
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluierung und Nutzung der natürlichen Krankheitsresistenz beim Schwein – aktueller Stand und Möglichkeiten

Evaluation and application of disease resistance in swine – state of art and chances
G. Reiner
1   Aus der Klinik für Wiederkäuer und Schweine (geschäftsführender Direktor: Prof. Dr. K. Doll) der Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Natürliche Resistenzen gegenüber Infektionskrankheiten wurden beim Schwein im Zusammenhang mit Virosen, Bakteriosen und Parasitosen beschrieben. Der jeweilige Kenntnisstand schwankt dabei von der Beobachtung von Tier- und Populationsunterschieden über die mehr oder weniger vollständige molekulare Aufklärung der zugrunde liegenden Mechanismen bis hin zum Einsatz von Resistenzgenvarianten in der Praxis. Die vorliegende Arbeit skizziert den aktuellen Kenntnisstand und veranschaulicht, auch anhand eigener Forschungsarbeiten, den Weg vom klinischen Bild zur Identifikation des Resistenzgens. Anhand des E.-coli-F18-Rezeptors wird der erreichte Praxisstand dargestellt.

Summary

Evaluation and application of disease resistance in swine – state of art and chances

Resistance against infectious diseases has been described regarding viroses, bacterioses and parasitoses in swine. The state of knowledge varies from differences between animals and populations over more or less complete molecular elucidations of the basic mechanisms to the use in selection practice. The present paper describes the relevant state and illustrates the course from clinical situation to the identification of the resistance gene. Reached status in practice is described with the E. coli-F18-receptor.

Schlüsselwörter

Schwein - Krankheitsresistenz - Pseudorabies-Virus - Sarcocystis - E. coli

Keywords

Swine - Disease resistance - Pseudorabies virus - Sarcocystis - E. coli
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Adams LG, Templeton JW. Genetic resistance to bacterial diseases of animals. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 1998; 17: 200-19.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Baker RL, Mwamachi DM, Audho JO, Aduda EO, Thorpe W. Genetic resistance to gastro-intestinal nematode parasites in Red Maasai, Dorper and Red Maasai χ Dorper ewes in the subhumid tropics. Anim Sci 1999; 69: 335-44.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Baskerville A. Aujeszky’s disease: recent advances in current problems. N Z Vet J 1981; 29: 183-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bisset SA, Morris CA. Feasability and implications of breeding sheep for resilience to nematode challenge. Int J Parasitol 1996; 26: 857-68.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Blackwell JM. Structure and function of the natural-resistance-associated macrophage protein (Nramp1), a candidate protein for infectious and autoimmune disease susceptibility. Mol Med Today 1996; 2: 205-11.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bertschinger HU, Stamm M, Vögeli P. Inheritance of resistance to oedema disease in the pig: Experiments with an Escherichia coli strain expressing fimbriae 107. Vet Microbiol 1993; 35: 79-89.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bumstead N. Genetic resistance to avian viruses. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 1998; 17: 249-55.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cameron HS, Hughes EH, Gregory PW. Genetic resistance to brucellosis in swine. J Anim Sci 1942; 1: 106-10.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cole RK. Studies on genetic resistance to Marek’s disease. Avian Dis 1968; 12: 9-28.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Damriyasa IM. Querschnittsstudie zu Parasitosen bei Zuchtsauen in südhessischen Betrieben. Diss med vet. Gießen: 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Daugschies AT, Schnieder T, Rommel M, Bickardt K. The effects of Sarcocystis miescheriana infections on blood enzymes and weight gain of stress-sensitive and stress-insensitive pigs. Vet Parasitol 1988; 27: 221-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Doenhoff MJ. The immune system. Breeding for Disease Resistance in Farm Animals.. Axford RFE, Bishop SC, Nicholas FW, Owen JB. CABI; Wallingford: 2000: 47-72.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Donaldson AI, Alexandersen S. Relative resistance of pigs to infection by natural aerosols of FMD virus. Vet Rec 2001; 148: 600-2.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dubey JP, Speer CA, Fayer R. Sarcocystosis of animals and man. Boca Raton. Florida: CRC Press Inc.; 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Eberle F, Dubreuil P, Mattei MG, Devilard E, Lopez M. The human PRR2 gene, related to the human poliovirus receptor gene (PVR), is the true homolog of the murine MPH gene. Gene 1995; 159: 267-72.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Edfors-Lilja I, Wattrang E, Magnusson U, Fossum C. Genetic variation in parameters reflecting immune competence of swine. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1994; 40: 1-16.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Edfors-Lilja I, Gustafsson U, Duval-Iflah Y, Ellergren H, Johansson M, Juneja RK, Marklund L, Andersson L. The porcine intestinal receptor for Escherichia coli K88ab, K88ac: regional localization on chromosome 13 and influence of IgG response to the K88 antigen. Anim Genet 1995; 26: 237-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Edfors-Lilja I, Wattrang E, Marklund L, Moller M, Andersson-Eklund L, Andersson L, Fossum C. Mapping quantitative trait loci for immune capacity in the pig. J Immunol 1998; 160: 829-35.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Edfors-Lilja I, Wallgren P. Escherichia coli and Salmonella diarrhoea in pigs. Breeding for Disease Resistance in Farm Animals.. Axford RFE, Bishop SC, Nicholas FW, Owen JB. Wallingford: CABI; 2000: 253-67.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Francis DH, Erickson AK, Grange PA. K88 adhesins of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and their porcine enterocyte receptors. Adv Exp Med Biol 1999; 473: 147-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gaastra W, de Graaf FK. Host-specific fimbrial adhesins of noninvasive enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains. Microbiol Rev 1982; 46: 129-61.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Geraghty RJ, Krummenacher C, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Spear PG. Entry of alphaherpesvirus mediated by polyovirus receptor-related protein 1 and polyovirus receptor. Science 1998; 280: 1618-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gibbons RA, Sellwood R, Burrows M, Hunter PA. Inheritance of resistance to neonatal E. coli diarrhea in the pig: Examination of the genetic system. Theor Appl Genet 1977; 51: 65-70.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Grob P, Schijns VECJ, Van den Broek MF, Cox SPJ, Ackermann M, Suter M. Role of the individual interferon systems and specific immunity in mice in controlling systemic dissemination of attenuated pseudorabies virus infection. J Virol 1999; 73: 4748-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Guerin G, Duval-Iflah Y, Bonneau M, Bertaud M, Guillaume P, Ollivier L. Evidence for linkage between K88ab, K88ac intestinal receptors to Escherichia coli and transferrin loci in pigs. Anim Genet 1993; 24: 393-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Haley CS, Andersson L. Linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci in plants and animals. Genome Mapping.. Dear PH. Oxford, NewYork, Tokio: IRL Press; 1997: 49-71.
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Haley CS, Knott SA, Elsen JM. Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. Genetics 1994; 136: 1195-207.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Haller O, Frese M, Kochs G. Mx proteins: mediators of innate resistance to RNA viruses. Rev Sci Tech Off Epiz 1998; 17: 220-30.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Heringstad B, Klemetsdal G, Ruane J. Selection for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle: a review with focus on the situation in the nordic countries. Livestock Prod Sci 2000; 64: 95-106.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hessing MJ, Scheepens CJ, Schouten WG, Tielen MJ, Wiepkema P.R. Social rank and disease susceptibility in pigs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1994; 43: 373-87.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hessing MJ, Coenen GJ, Vaiman M, Renard C. Individual differences in cell-mediated and humoral immunity in pigs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1995; 45: 97-113.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hutt FB. Genetic resistance to disease in domestic animals.. Ithaca, N. Y.: Comstock Publishers; 1958
  • 33 Karger A, Mettenleiter TC. Identification of cell surface molecules that interact with pseudorabies virus. J Virol 1996; 70: 2138-45.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kluge JP, Beran GW, Hill HT, Platt KB. Pseudorabies. Diseases of Swine. 8th ed. Straw BE, Dállaire S, Mengeling WL, Taylor DJ. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1999: 233-46.
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Lacey C, Wilkie BN, Kennedy BW, Mallard BA. Genetic and other effects on bacterial phagocytosis and killing by cultured peripheral blood monocytes of SLA-defined miniature pigs. Animal Genet 1989; 20: 371-82.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Madden KB, Murrell KD, Lunney JK. Trichinella spiralis: Major histocompatibility complex-associated elimination of encysted muscle larvae in swine. Exp Parasitol 1990; 70: 443-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Madden KB, Moeller RF, Douglass LW, Goldman T, Lunney JK. Trichinella spiralis: Genetic basis and kinetics of the anti-encysted muscle larval response in miniature swine. Exp Parasitol 1993; 77: 23-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Martins CL, Lawman MJ, Scholl T, Mebus CA, Lunney JK. African swine fever virus specific porcine cytotoxic T cell activity. Arch Virol 1993; 129 (14) 211-25.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 McFerran JB, Dow C. Studies on immunization of pigs with the Bartha strain of Aujeszky’s disease virus. Res Vet Sci 1975; 19: 17-22.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Meeker DL, Rothschild MF, Christian LL, Warner CM, Hill HT. Genetic control of immune response to pseudorabies and atrophic rhinitis vaccines: I. Heterosis, general combining ability and relationship to growth and backfat. J Anim Sci 1987; 64: 407-13.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Meeker DL, Rothschild MF, Christian LL, Warner CM, Hill HT. Genetic control of immune response to pseudorabies and atrophic rhinitis vaccines: II. Comparison of additive direct and maternal genetic effects. J Anim Sci 1987; 64: 414-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Meijerink E, Fries R, Vögeli P, Masabanda J, Wigger G, Stricker C, Neuenschwander S, Bertschinger HU, Stranzinger G. Two a(1,2) fucosyltrans-ferase genes on porcine chromosome 6q11 are closely linked to the blood group inhibitor (S) and Escherichia coli F18 receptor (ECF18R) loci. Mammalian Genome 1997; 8: 736-41.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Mengeling WL, Cutlip RC. Pathogenicity of field isolants of hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus for neonatal pigs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1976; 168: 236-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Mettenleiter TC. Aujeszky’s disease (pseudorabies) virus: the virus and molecular pathogenesis-state of the art, June 1999. Vet Res 2000; 31: 99-115.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Meuwissen TH, Van Arendonk JA. Potential improvements in rate of genetic gain from marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes. J Dairy Sci 1992; 75: 1651-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Müller M, Brenig B, Winnacker EL, Brem G. Transgenic pigs carrying cDNA copies encoding the murine Mx1 protein which confers resistance to influenza virus infection. Gene 1992; 121: 263-70.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Murray M, Stear MJ, Trail JCM, DÍteran GD, Agyemang K, Dwinger RH. Trypanosomiasis in cattle. Prospects for control.. Axford RFE, Bishop SC, Nicholas FW, Owen JB. Breeding for Disease Resistance in Farm Animals.. Wallingford: CABI; 2000: 203-23.
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Nagy B, Fekete PZ. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in farm animals. Vet Res 1999; 30: 259-84.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Nicholas FW. Veterinary Genetics.. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987
  • 50 Oura CA, Powell PP, Anderson E, Parkhouse RM. The pathogenesis of African swine fever in the resistant bushpig. J Gen Virol 1998; 79: 1439-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Peelman LJ. Genetic investigation of the resistance mechanisms of the pig against diarrhea caused by E. coli. . Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg 1999; 61: 489-515.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Plonait H, Bickardt K. Vorwort zur zweiten Auflage. Lehrbuch der Schweinekrankheiten.. Plonait H, Bickardt K. Berlin: Parey; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Przytulski T, Porzeczkowska D. Studies on genetic resistance to leptospirosis in pigs. Br Vet J 1980; 136: 25-32.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Reiner G, Melchinger E, Kramarova M, Pfaff E, Büttner M, Saalmüller A, Geldermann H. Detection of quantitative trait loci for resistance/susceptibility to the Pseudorabies Virus in swine. J Gen Virol 2002; 83: 167-72.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Reiner G, Eckert J, Peischl T, Bochert S, Mackenstedt U, Joachim A, Daugschies A, Geldermann H. Variation in clinical and parasitological traits in Pietrain and Meishan pigs infected with Sarcocystis miescheriana . Vet Parasitol 2002; 106: 99-113.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Rothschild MF, Hill HT, Christian LL, Warner CM. Genetic differences in serum-neutralisation titers of pigs after vaccination with pseudorabies modified live-virus vaccine. Am J Vet Res 1984; 45: 1216-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Rothschild MF, Chen HL, Christian LL, Lie WR, Venier L, Cooper M, Briggs C, Warner CM. Breed and swine lymphocyte antigen haplotype differences in agglutination titers following vaccination with B. bronchi-septica. J Anim Sci 1984; 59: 643-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Stear MJ, Wakelin D. Genetic resistance to parasitic infection. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 1998; 17: 143-53.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Teneberg S, Willemsen P, De Graaf FK, Karlsson KA. Receptor-active glycolipids of the epithelial cells of the small intestine of young and adult pigs in relation to susceptibility to infection with Escherichia coli K99. FEBS Lett 1990; 263: 10-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Tuggle CK, Schmitz CB, Gingerich-Feil D. Rapid communication: cloning of a pig full-length natural resistance associated macrophage protein (NRAMP1) cDNA. J Anim Sci 1997; 75: 277.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Van den Broeck W, Cox E, Oudega B, Goddeeris BM. The F4 fimbrial antigen of Escherichia coli and its receptors. Vet Microbiol 2000; 71: 223-44.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Vögeli P, Bertschinger HU, Stamm M, Stricker C, Hagger C, Fries R, Rapacz J, Stranzinger G. Genes specifying receptors for F18 fimbriated Escherichia coli, causing oedema disease and postweaning diarrhoe in pigs, map to chromosome 6. Anim Genet 1996; 27: 321-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Vögeli P, Meijerink E, Fries R, Neuenschwander S, Vorlander N, Stranzinger G, Bertschinger HU. A molecular test for the detection of E. coli F18 receptors: a breakthrough in the struggle against edema disease and post- weaning diarrhea. Schweizer Arch Tierheilk 1997; 139: 479-84.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Wakelin D. Genetic control of susceptibility and resistance to parasitic infection. Adv Parasitol 1978; 16: 219-308.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Wilkie BN, Mallard B. Genetic aspects of health and disease in pigs. Breeding for Disease resistance in farm animals.. Axford RFE, Bishop SC, Nicholas FW, Owen JB. Wallingford: CABI; 2000: 379-96.
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Wittig W, Klie H, Gallien P, Lehmann S, Timm M, Tschape H. Prevalence of the fimbrial antigens F18 and K88 and of enterotoxins and verotoxins among Escherichia coli isolated from weaned pigs. Zentralbl Bakteriol 1995 Nov 283 (01) 95-104.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Zuckermann FA. Aujeszky’s disease virus: opportunities and challenges. Vet Res 2000; 31: 121-31.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar