Osteologie 2014; 23(04): 275-280
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1622025
Osteoonkologie
Schattauer GmbH

Strahlentherapie von Skelettmetastasen

Standardverfahren und zukünftige TherapieansätzeRadiotherapy for skeletal metastasesStandard of therapy and prospective therapeutical approach
B. Gauter-Fleckenstein
1   Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim
,
T. Reis
1   Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim
,
F. Wenz
1   Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht: 01 July 2014

angenommen: 06 October 2014

Publication Date:
02 January 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die Strahlentherapie der Knochenmetastasen ermöglicht eine suffiziente Analgesie bei den meisten behandelten Patienten, wobei diese in bis zu 50 % aller Fälle noch nach einem Jahr anhält. Im Verlauf von Wochen kommt es nach erfolgter Strahlentherapie auch zur Rekalzifizierung, so dass auch eine Stabilisierung osteolytischer Metastasen möglich ist. Die Therapie kann sowohl von einem bis wenige Tage als auch über mehrere Wochen dauern, wobei hierbei gleichwertig Analgesie, bei den protrahierten Regimen aber vermehrt Stabilität erreicht wird. Durch moderne Techniken, wie zum Beispiel externe stereotaktische intensitätsmodulierte Strahlentherapie oder aber auch durch kombinierte operative Verfahren wie Kyphoplastie mit intraoperativer Radiatio mit 50 kV-Photonen lassen sich auch Bestrahlungen komplizierter Volumina in der Nähe von Risikoorganen realisieren. Daher werden damit auch kurzfristige ReBestrahlungen möglich. Wenn indiziert, sollten immer eine antiresorptive Therapie und eine Hormontherapie (bei Mammaund Prostatakarzinom) durchgeführt werden. Falls eine operative Stabilisierung oder Tumordebulking (bei Rückenmarkkompression) notwendig wird, sollte im Anschluss die Radiotherapie zur Tumorzellsterilisation erfolgen.

Summary

Radiotherapy of bone metastases causes analgesia within two weeks in almost every treated patient, while after one year 50 % of all treated patients are still free of pain at the treated site. Stability in osteolytic lesions results from recalcification that can be detected several weeks after cessation of radiotherapy. Different fractionation regimens exist from days to several weeks. These regimens do not differ in their analgesic potency but more protracted radiotherapy results in a higher rate of stability and less re-irradiation. Modern radiotherapy modalities, i. e. stereotactic IMRT or the combination of kyphoplasty and intraoperative radiotherapy with 50 kV photons (Kypho-IORT) allow radiotherapy of complicated fields in vicinity of organs at risk. Therefore, repeated radiotherapy becomes an option even after short intervals. Antiresorptive agents or anti-hormone therapy (in breast- or prostate cancer) should be incorporated whenever indicated. Post-operative radiotherapy with the goal of tumour-cell sterilisation should always be implemented after surgical stabilisation or tumour debulking/ laminectomy in case of myelocompression.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clinical cancer research 2006; 12 20 Pt 2 6243s-6249s.
  • 2 Nielsen OS, Munro AJ, Tannock IF. Bone metastases: pathophysiology and management policy. Journal of clinical oncology 1991; 09 (03) 509-524.
  • 3 Domchek SM, Younger J, Finkelstein DM, Seiden MV. Predictors of skeletal complications in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89 (02) 363-368.
  • 4 Coleman RE. Management of bone metastases. The oncologist 2000; 05 (06) 463-470.
  • 5 Mercadante S. Malignant bone pain: pathophysiology and treatment. Pain 1997; 69 1–2 1-18.
  • 6 Harrington KD. The management of acetabular insufficiency secondary to metastatic malignant disease. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1981; 63 (04) 653-664.
  • 7 Kuttig H. [Radiotherapy of bone metastases]. Röntgen-Blatter; Zeitschrift fur Röntgen-Technik und medizinisch-wissenschaftliche Photographie 1983; 36 (07) 209-215.
  • 8 Falkmer U, Jarhult J, Wersall P, Cavallin-Stahl E. A systematic overview of radiation therapy effects in skeletal metastases. Acta oncologica 2003; 42 5–6 620-633.
  • 9 Haentjens P, Casteleyn PP, Opdecam P. Evaluation of impending fractures and indications for prophylactic fixation of metastases in long bones. Review of the literature. Acta orthopaedica Belgica 1993; 59 Suppl 1 6-11.
  • 10 Souchon R, Wenz F, Sedlmayer F. et al. DEGRO practice guidelines for palliative radiotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: bone metastases and metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2009; 185 (07) 417-424.
  • 11 Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF. et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2005; 366 9486 643-648.
  • 12 Lutz S, Berk L, Chang E. et al. Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidencebased guideline. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2011; 79 (04) 965-976.
  • 13 Nieder C, Pawinski A, Dalhaug A. Continuous controversy about radiation oncologists’ choice of treatment regimens for bone metastases: should we blame doctors, cancer-related features, or design of previous clinical studies?. Radiation oncology 2013; 08: 85.
  • 14 Sze WM, Shelley M, Held I, Mason M. Palliation of metastatic bone pain: single fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy – a systematic review of the randomised trials. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2004 (2): CD004721.
  • 15 Wu JS, Wong R, Johnston M. et al. Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative Supportive Care G. Meta-analysis of dose-fractionation radiotherapy trials for the palliation of painful bone metastases. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2003; 55 (03) 594-605.
  • 16 8 Gy single fraction radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic skeletal pain: randomised comparison with a multifraction schedule over 12 months of patient follow-up. Bone Pain Trial Working Party. Radiotherapy and oncology 1999; 52 (02) 111-121.
  • 17 Blitzer PH. Reanalysis of the RTOG study of the palliation of symptomatic osseous metastasis. Cancer 1985; 55 (07) 1468-1472.
  • 18 Chow E, Zeng L, Salvo N. et al. Update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases. Clinical oncology 2012; 24 (02) 112-124.
  • 19 Tong D, Gillick L, Hendrickson FR. The palliation of symptomatic osseous metastases: final results of the Study by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer 1982; 50 (05) 893-899.
  • 20 Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW. et al. Randomized trial of short-versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005; 97 (11) 798-804.
  • 21 Gerszten PC, Burton SA, Ozhasoglu C, Welch WC. Radiosurgery for spinal metastases: clinical experience in 500 cases from a single institution. Spine 2007; 32 (02) 193-199.
  • 22 Jin R, Rock J, Jin JY. et al. Single fraction spine radiosurgery for myeloma epidural spinal cord compression. Journal of experimental therapeutics & oncology 2009; 08 (01) 35-41.
  • 23 Moulding HD, Elder JB, Lis E. et al. Local disease control after decompressive surgery and adjuvant high-dose single-fraction radiosurgery for spine metastases. Journal of neurosurgery Spine 2010; 13 (01) 87-93.
  • 24 Boehling NS, Grosshans DR, Allen PK. et al. Vertebral compression fracture risk after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Journal of neurosurgery Spine 2012; 16 (04) 379-386.
  • 25 Cunha MV, Al-Omair A, Atenafu EG. et al. Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): analysis of predictive factors. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2012; 84 (03) e343-e349.
  • 26 Sahgal A, Atenafu EG, Chao S. et al. Vertebral compression fracture after spine stereotactic body radiotherapy: a multi-institutional analysis with a focus on radiation dose and the spinal instability neoplastic score. Journal of clinical oncology 2013; 31 (27) 3426-3431.
  • 27 Wenz F, Schneider F, Neumaier C. et al. Kypho-IORT – a novel approach of intraoperative radiotherapy during kyphoplasty for vertebral metastases. Radiation oncology 2010; 05: 11.
  • 28 Bludau F, Schmidt R, Schneider F. et al. [Learning and teaching abilities of a newly inaugurated operation technique. Analysis of learning curves and transferability exemplified by Kypho-IORT]. Der Orthopade 2013; 42 (09) 772-779.
  • 29 Reis T, Bludau F, Schneider F, Wenz F. Intraoperative radiotherapy combined with kyphoplasty (Kypho-IORT) for spinal metastases: dose escalation study and clinical results. [in preparation].
  • 30 Reis T, Schneider F, Welzel G. et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy during kyphoplasty for vertebral metastases (Kypho-IORT): first clinical results. Tumori 2012; 98 (04) 434-440.
  • 31 Schmidt R, Wenz F, Reis T. et al. Kyphoplasty and intra-operative radiotheray, combination of kyphoplasty and intra-operative radiation for spinal metastases: technical feasibility of a novel approach. International orthopaedics 2012; 36 (06) 1255-1260.
  • 32 Balducci M, Chiesa S, Manfrida S. et al. Impact of radiotherapy on pain relief and recalcification in plasma cell neoplasms: long-term experience. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2011; 187 (02) 114-119.
  • 33 Rief H, Bischof M, Bruckner T. et al. The stability of osseous metastases of the spine in lung cancer – a retrospective analysis of 338 cases. Radiation oncology 2013; 08 (01) 200.
  • 34 Mitera G, Zhang L, Sahgal A. et al. A survey of expectations and understanding of palliative radiotherapy from patients with advanced cancer. Clinical oncology 2012; 24 (02) 134-138.
  • 35 Arnold M, Kummermehr J, Trott KR. Radiationinduced impairment of osseous healing: quantitative studies using a standard drilling defect in rat femur. Radiation research 1995; 143 (01) 77-84.