J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77(03): 199-206
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564590
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

One Piece Orbitozygomatic Approach Based on the Sphenoid Ridge Keyhole: Anatomical Study

Toma Spiriev
1   Department of Neurosurgery Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Lars Poulsgaard
1   Department of Neurosurgery Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Kaare Fugleholm
1   Department of Neurosurgery Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

30 March 2015

28 July 2015

Publication Date:
08 October 2015 (online)

Abstract

The one-piece orbitozygomatic (OZ) approach is traditionally based on the McCarty keyhole. Here, we present the use of the sphenoid ridge keyhole and its possible advantages as a keyhole for the one-piece OZ approach. Using transillumination technique the osteology of the sphenoid ridge was examined on 20 anatomical dry skull specimens. The results were applied to one-piece OZ approaches performed on freshly frozen cadaver heads. We defined the center of the sphenoid ridge keyhole as a superficial projection on the lateral skull surface of the most anterior and thickest part of the sphenoid ridge. It was located 22 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.22 mm) from the superior temporal line; 10.7 mm (SD, 0.08 mm) posterior and 7.1 mm (SD, 0.22 mm) inferior to the frontozygomatic suture. The sphenoid ridge burr hole provides exposure of frontal, temporal dura as well as periorbita, which is essential for the later bone cuts. There is direct access to removal of the thickest (sphenoidal) part of the orbital roof, after which the paper-thin (frontal) part of the orbital roof is easily fractured. The sphenoid ridge is an easily identifiable landmark on the lateral skull surface, located below the usual placement of the McCarty keyhole, with comparative exposure.

 
  • References

  • 1 Aziz KM, Froelich SC, Cohen PL, Sanan A, Keller JT, van Loveren HR. The one-piece orbitozygomatic approach: the MacCarty burr hole and the inferior orbital fissure as keys to technique and application. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002; 144 (1) 15-24
  • 2 Andaluz N, Van Loveren HR, Keller JT, Zuccarello M. Anatomic and clinical study of the orbitopterional approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2003; 52 (5) 1140-1148 , discussion 1148–1149
  • 3 Balasingam V, Noguchi A, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Modified osteoplastic orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2005; 102 (5) 940-944
  • 4 Cheng CM, Chang CF, Ma HI, Chiang YH, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Modified orbitozygomatic craniotomy for large medial sphenoid wing meningiomas. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16 (9) 1157-1160
  • 5 Chanda A, Nanda A. Anatomical study of the orbitozygomatic transsellar-transcavernous-transclinoidal approach to the basilar artery bifurcation. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (1) 151-160
  • 6 Day JD. Cranial base surgical techniques for large sphenocavernous meningiomas: technical note. Neurosurgery 2000; 46 (3) 754-759 , discussion 759–760
  • 7 Delashaw Jr JB, Jane JA, Kassell NF, Luce C. Supraorbital craniotomy by fracture of the anterior orbital roof. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1993; 79 (4) 615-618
  • 8 Delashaw Jr JB, Tedeschi H, Rhoton AL. Modified supraorbital craniotomy: technical note. Neurosurgery 1992; 30 (6) 954-956
  • 9 Deshmukh VR, Albuquerque FC, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Surgical management of cavernous malformations involving the cranial nerves. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (2) 352-357 , discussion 357
  • 10 Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM , et al. Quantitative anatomic study of three surgical approaches to the anterior communicating artery complex. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (2, Suppl): 397-405 , discussion 397–405
  • 11 Golshani KJ, Lalwani K, Delashaw JB, Selden NR. Modified orbitozygomatic craniotomy for craniopharyngioma resection in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009; 4 (4) 345-352
  • 12 Gonzalez LF, Crawford NR, Horgan MA, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (3) 550-555 , discussion 555–557
  • 13 Lemole Jr GM, Henn JS, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Modifications to the orbitozygomatic approach. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2003; 99 (5) 924-930
  • 14 Schwartz MS, Anderson GJ, Horgan MA, Kellogg JX, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Quantification of increased exposure resulting from orbital rim and orbitozygomatic osteotomy via the frontotemporal transsylvian approach. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (6) 1020-1026
  • 15 Sekhar LN, Kalia KK, Yonas H, Wright DC, Ching H. Cranial base approaches to intracranial aneurysms in the subarachnoid space. Neurosurgery 1994; 35 (3) 472-481 , discussion 481–483
  • 16 Orbitozygomatic frontotemporal approach. In: Sekhar LN, Oliveira ED, eds. Cranial Microsurgery: Approaches and Techniques. New York: Thieme; 1999: 130-133
  • 17 Sindou M, Emery E, Acevedo G, Ben-David U. Respective indications for orbital rim, zygomatic arch and orbito-zygomatic osteotomies in the surgical approach to central skull base lesions. Critical, retrospective review in 146 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143 (10) 967-975
  • 18 van Furth WR, Agur AM, Woolridge N, Cusimano MD. The orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (1, Suppl): ONS103-ONS107 , discussion ONS103–ONS107
  • 19 Youssef AS, Willard L, Downes A , et al. The frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic approach: reconstructive technique and outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154 (7) 1275-1283
  • 20 Zabramski JM, Kiriş T, Sankhla SK, Cabiol J, Spetzler RF. Orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1998; 89 (2) 336-341
  • 21 Hsu FP, Clatterbuck RE, Spetzler RF. Orbitozygomatic approach to basilar apex aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (1, Suppl): 172-177 , discussion 172–177
  • 22 Seçkin H, Avci E, Uluç K, Niemann D, Başkaya MK. The work horse of skull base surgery: orbitozygomatic approach. Technique, modifications, and applications. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25 (6) E4
  • 23 McArthur LL. An aseptic surgical access to the pituitary body and its neighborhood. JAMA 1912; 58: 2009-2011
  • 24 Frazier CH. I. An Approach to the Hypophysis through the Anterior Cranial Fossa. Ann Surg 1913; 57 (2) 145-150
  • 25 Yasargil MG, Fox JL, Ray MW. The operative approach to aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery. In: Krayenbühl H, ed. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery. Vol. 2. Vienna: Springer Verlag; 1975: 113-170
  • 26 Pellerin P, Lesoin F, Dhellemmes P, Donazzan M, Jomin M. Usefulness of the orbitofrontomalar approach associated with bone reconstruction for frontotemporosphenoid meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1984; 15 (5) 715-718
  • 27 Hakuba A, Liu S, Nishimura S. The orbitozygomatic infratemporal approach: a new surgical technique. Surg Neurol 1986; 26 (3) 271-276
  • 28 Jane JA, Park TS, Pobereskin LH, Winn HR, Butler AB. The supraorbital approach: technical note. Neurosurgery 1982; 11 (4) 537-542
  • 29 Al-Mefty O. Supraorbital-pterional approach to skull base lesions. Neurosurgery 1987; 21 (4) 474-477
  • 30 Gonzalez LF, Zabramski JM. Anatomic and clinical study of the orbitopterional approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2004; 54 (4) 1031-1032 , author reply 1032
  • 31 Tanriover N, Ulm AJ, Rhoton Jr AL, Kawashima M, Yoshioka N, Lewis SB. One-piece versus two-piece orbitozygomatic craniotomy: quantitative and qualitative considerations. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (4) (Suppl. 02) ONS-229-ONS-237 , discussion ONS-237
  • 32 Shimizu S, Tanriover N, Rhoton Jr AL, Yoshioka N, Fujii K. MacCarty keyhole and inferior orbital fissure in orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (1, Suppl): 152-159 , discussion 152–159
  • 33 Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Oakes WJ. Quantitation of and measurements utilizing the sphenoid ridge. Clin Anat 2007; 20 (2) 131-134
  • 34 Rhoton Jr AL. Operative techniques and instrumentation for neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (4) 907-934 , discussion 934
  • 35 Ribas GC, Ribas EC, Rodrigues CJ. The anterior sylvian point and the suprasylvian operculum. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 18 (6B): E2
  • 36 Nathal E, Gomez-Amador JL. Anatomic and surgical basis of the sphenoid ridge keyhole approach for cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (1, Suppl): 178-185 , discussion 178–185
  • 37 Ammirati M, Spallone A, Ma J, Cheatham M, Becker D. An anatomicosurgical study of the temporal branch of the facial nerve. Neurosurgery 1993; 33 (6) 1038-1043 , discussion 1044
  • 38 Coscarella E, Vishteh AG, Spetzler RF, Seoane E, Zabramski JM. Subfascial and submuscular methods of temporal muscle dissection and their relationship to the frontal branch of the facial nerve. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2000; 92 (5) 877-880
  • 39 Krayenbühl N, Isolan GR, Hafez A, Yaşargil MG. The relationship of the fronto-temporal branches of the facial nerve to the fascias of the temporal region: a literature review applied to practical anatomical dissection. Neurosurg Rev 2007; 30 (1) 8-15 , discussion 15 discussion
  • 40 Salas E, Ziyal IM, Bejjani GK, Sekhar LN. Anatomy of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve and indications for interfascial dissection. Neurosurgery 1998; 43 (3) 563-568 , discussion 568–569
  • 41 Yaşargil MG, Reichman MV, Kubik S. Preservation of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve using the interfascial temporalis flap for pterional craniotomy. Technical article. J Neurosurg 1987; 67 (3) 463-466
  • 42 Spetzler RF, Lee KS. Reconstruction of the temporalis muscle for the pterional craniotomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1990; 73 (4) 636-637
  • 43 Oikawa S, Mizuno M, Muraoka S, Kobayashi S. Retrograde dissection of the temporalis muscle preventing muscle atrophy for pterional craniotomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1996; 84 (2) 297-299
  • 44 MacCarty CS. Surgical techniques for removal of intracranial meningiomas. Clin Neurosurg 1959; 7: 100-111
  • 45 MacCarty CS, Brown DN. Orbital tumors in children. Clin Neurosurg 1964; 11: 76-93
  • 46 Ikeda K, Yamashita J, Hashimoto M, Futami K. Orbitozygomatic temporopolar approach for a high basilar tip aneurysm associated with a short intracranial internal carotid artery: a new surgical approach. Neurosurgery 1991; 28 (1) 105-110
  • 47 Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA. Refined and simplified surgical landmarks for the MacCarty keyhole and orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (6, Suppl Operative): 230-233
  • 48 Yaşargil MGazi. Microneurosurgery. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1984
  • 49 Mori K, Esaki T, Yamamoto T, Nakao Y. Individualized pterional keyhole clipping surgery based on a preoperative three-dimensional virtual osteotomy technique for unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2011; 54 (5–6) 207-213
  • 50 Mori K, Osada H, Yamamoto T, Nakao Y, Maeda M. Pterional keyhole approach to middle cerebral artery aneurysms through an outer canthal skin incision. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007; 50 (4) 195-201
  • 51 Abdel Aziz KM, Bhatia S, Tantawy MH , et al. Minimally invasive transpalpebral “eyelid” approach to the anterior cranial base. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (2, Suppl Operative): ons195-ons206 , discussion 206–207