Download PDF
Gefäßmedizin Scan - Zeitschrift für Angiologie, Gefäßchirurgie, diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie 2015; 02(02): 159-171
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391983
Fortbildung
Zentrale Venen
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Interventionelle und operative Therapie akuter und chronischer Verschlüsse des tiefen Venensystems

H. Jalaie
,
C. H. A. Wittens
,
J. Grommes
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 May 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints
Fazit

Derzeit sollte Patienten mit einer iliofemoralen oder auch einer kavalen Thrombose eine Therapie zur Thrombusbeseitigung angeboten werden, obwohl dazu zurzeit nur wenige prospektive randomisierte Daten vorliegen. Die chronisch venöse Obstruktion gewinnt in der Pathophysiologie des postthrombotischen Syndromes an Bedeutung. Die endovaskuläre Rekanalisation bietet hier neue therapeutische Möglichkeiten zur Behandlung des postthrombotischen Syndromes.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Strijkers RH, Cate-Hoek AJ, Bukkems SF et al. Management of deep vein thrombosis and prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome. BMJ 2011; 343: d5916
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA et al. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 698-707
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Akesson H, Brudin L, Dahlstrom JA et al. Venous function assessed during a 5 year period after acute ilio-femoral venous thrombosis treated with anticoagulation. Eur J Vasc Surg 1990; 4: 43-48
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kahn SR, Shbaklo H, Lamping DL et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life during the 2 years following deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 1105-1112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kahn SR, Ginsberg JS. Relationship between deep venous thrombosis and the postthrombotic syndrome. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 17-26
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Meissner MH, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO et al. Deep venous insufficiency: the relationship between lysis and subsequent reflux. J Vasc Surg 1993; 18: 596-605
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Singh H, Masuda EM. Comparing short-term outcomes of femoral-popliteal and iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: early lysis and development of reflux. Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19: 74-79
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Angiologie. S2-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie der Venenthrombose und der Lungenembolie“. AWMF-Register Nr. 065/002, 2010. Im Internet: http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/065-002.html (Stand: 17.3.2015)
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Grommes J. Pro and contra: aggressive or conservative thrombosis therapy? - Pro aggressive thrombosis therapy. Zentralbl Chir 2014; 139: 535-538
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Grommes J, Wittens C. Neue endovaskuläre Behandlungsmöglichkeiten der tiefen Venenthrombose. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2012; 137: 1524-1529
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bates SM, Jaeschke R, Stevens SM et al. Diagnosis of DVT: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. 9th ed. Chest 2012; 141 : e351S-e418S
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Comerota AJ, Aldridge SC. Thrombolytic therapy for deep venous thrombosis: a clinical review. Can J Surg 1993; 36: 359-364
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Comerota AJ. The current role of operative venous thrombectomy in deep vein thrombosis. Semin Vasc Surg 2012; 25: 2-12
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Liu F, Lu P, Jin B. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25: 707-715
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Popuri RK, Vedantham S. The role of thrombolysis in the clinical management of deep vein thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011; 31: 479-484
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Grommes J, Strijkers R, Greiner A et al. Safety and feasibility of ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis in deep vein thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41: 526-532
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 AbuRahma AF, Perkins SE, Wulu JT et al. Iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: conventional therapy versus lysis and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting. Ann Surg 2001; 233: 752-760
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Elsharawy M, Elzayat E. Early results of thrombolysis vs anticoagulation in iliofemoral venous thrombosis. A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 24: 209-214
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Enden T, Haig Y, Klow NE et al. Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 31-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Enden T, Klow NE, Sandvik L et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis vs. anticoagulant therapy alone in deep vein thrombosis: results of an open randomized, controlled trial reporting on short-term patency. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7: 1268-1275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Casey ET, Murad MH, Zumaeta-Garcia M et al. Treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 1463-1473
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Grommes J, von Trotha K, Wolf MD et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis in deep vein thrombosis: Which procedural measurement predicts outcome?. Phlebology 2014; 29 : 135-139
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Neglen P, Berry MA, Raju S. Endovascular surgery in the treatment of chronic primary and post-thrombotic iliac vein obstruction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 20: 560-571
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Neglen P. Chronic venous obstruction: diagnostic considerations and therapeutic role of percutaneous iliac stenting. Vascular 2007; 15: 273-280
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Neglen P, Hollis KC, Olivier J et al. Stenting of the venous outflow in chronic venous disease: long-term stent-related outcome, clinical, and hemodynamic result. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 979-990
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar