J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75(05): 368-370
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1373660
Letter to the Editor
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

In Reference to “The Value of Resident Presentations at Scientific Meetings”

Jean Anderson Eloy
1   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, United States
,
Peter F. Svider
4   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States
,
Adam J. Folbe
4   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States
,
Michael Setzen
5   Rhinology Section, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, United States
6   Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
Soly Baredes
1   Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, United States
2   Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 August 2014 (online)

In Reference to “The Value of Resident Presentations at Scientific Meetings”

We would like to thank the editors of major otolaryngology journals for their insightful editorial entitled “The Value of Resident Presentations at Scientific Meetings” published in The Laryngoscope and other prominent otolaryngologic journals.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] We strongly agree about the importance of encouraging research among residents and that poster presentations are an effective way to involve residents at scientific meetings and in the peer review process. Encouraging residents to apply for external sources of research support, such as those offered by the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts (CORE) grant program is also important. In addition to decreasing the financial burden on departments, CORE grants are associated with greater scholarly impact and subsequent National Institutes of Health funding support.[15]

In addition to the valuable points raised regarding resident participation in the editorial just cited,[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] we would like to emphasize the value of encouraging and guiding medical student scholarly activity. In our experience, collaborating with medical students on projects ranging from basic to more clinically oriented studies helps build the interest and skill set that make it more likely that they will enthusiastically pursue research activity during residency training. It is also helpful to them in their pursuit of competitive residency positions. Our recent analysis examining authorship trends in The Laryngoscope and International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology reveals medical students may be underinvolved, and it suggests tangible benefits to the faculty collaborating with students because there is an association between greater scholarly impact and collaborating with nondoctoral authors in these journals.[16] Regardless of what level of training one is at, we strongly agree with, support, and praise the editors' valuable points that supporting current trainees in scholarly pursuits is crucial for the continued advancement of our specialty.

Note

This letter to the editor is also being published in The Laryngoscope.


 
  • References

  • 1 Stewart MG, Chandra R, Chiu A , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (1) 1
  • 2 Stewart M, Chandra R, Chiu A , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2013; 27 (1) 1
  • 3 Stewart M, Chandra R, Chiu A , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. Head Neck 2013; 35 (1) 1
  • 4 The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2013; 3 (1) 3
  • 5 Chandra R, Chiu A, Gleeson M , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73 (6) 363
  • 6 Stewart M, Chandra R, Chiu A , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (1) 100
  • 7 Stewart M, Chandra R, Chiu A , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34 (1) 6-7
  • 8 Stewart M, Chandra R, Chiu A , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2012; 74 (5) 290-291
  • 9 Stewart M, Chandra R, Chiu A , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139(1): 100
  • 10 Stewart M, Chandra R, Chiu A , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. J Voice 2013; 27 (1) 1
  • 11 Sataloff RT. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. Ear Nose Throat J 2013; 92 (1) 10-12
  • 12 Stewart M, Chandra R, Hanna E , et al. Consortium statement. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013; 122 (1) 1-2
  • 13 Stewart M, Chandra R, Chiu A , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. Am J Otolaryngol 2013; 34 (1) 1-2
  • 14 Stewart M, Chandra R, Chiu A , et al. The value of resident presentations at scientific meetings. Int J Ped Otorhinol 2013; 77: 2
  • 15 Eloy JA, Svider PF, Folbe AJ, Setzen M, Baredes S. AAO-HNSF CORE grant acquisition is associated with greater scholarly impact. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 150 (1) 53-60
  • 16 Svider PF, Husain Q, Mauro KM, Folbe AJ, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Impact of mentoring medical students on scholarly productivity. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014; 4 (2) 138-142