Der Klinikarzt 2013; 42(8): 344-348
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1356895
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Multiples Myelom – Prognose, Therapie und neue Entwicklungen

Multiple myeloma – Prognosis and recent changes in management and treatment
Roland Fenk
1   Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und klinische Immunologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Düsseldorf
,
Tobias Strapatsas
1   Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und klinische Immunologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Düsseldorf
,
Rainer Haas
1   Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und klinische Immunologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Düsseldorf
,
Guido Kobbe
1   Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und klinische Immunologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Düsseldorf
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 September 2013 (online)

Die Diagnostik und Therapie des multiplen Myeloms hat sich in den letzten 15 Jahren stetig verbessert. Ein besseres Verständnis der Pathophysiologie der Erkrankung, modernere diagnostische Methoden und nicht zuletzt eine Welle von neu zugelassenen Medikamenten haben dabei in den letzten Jahren zu einer kontinuierlichen Verlängerung des Überlebens der Patienten geführt. So ist das multiple Myelom heutzutage zwar immer noch eine nicht heilbare hämatologische Neoplasie, die Erkrankung hat sich jedoch zu einer chronischen Erkrankung entwickelt. Dies spiegelt sich insbesondere in der 10-Jahres-Überlebensrate wider, die im Zeitalter der konventionellen Chemotherapie unter 10 % lag und heute für Patienten, die mit Hochdosistherapie und autologer Blutstammzelltransplantation in Kombination mit neuen Substanzen behandelt werden, bei ungefähr 50 % liegt. Im Folgenden sollen diese neuen Entwicklungen kurz zusammengefasst werden.

Diagnostic procedures and treatment options for patients with multiple myeloma tremendously improved during the last 15 years. A more profound understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease in combination with more sensitive diagnostic methods and last but not least an abundant number of novel drugs resulted in a significantly prolongation of the overall survival of patients. As a consequence the diagnosis of multiple myeloma is no longer associated with a fatal prognosis with less than 10 % of patients surviving 10 years or more. Currently, half of the young and fit patients, who are treated with combination therapy including novel agents and high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation, are living longer than 10 years and multiple myeloma has become a chronic disease. This review summarizes the recent changes in the understanding, management and treatment of patients with multiple myeloma.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2009; 23: 3-9
  • 2 Greipp PR, San MJ, Durie BG et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 3412-3420
  • 3 Kropil P, Fenk R, Fritz LB et al. Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 51-58
  • 4 Katzmann JA, Clark R, Kyle RA et al. Suppression of uninvolved immunoglobulins defined by heavy/light chain pair suppression is a risk factor for progression of MGUS. Leukemia 2013; 27: 208-212
  • 5 Haas R, Bruns I, Kobbe G, Fenk R. High-dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Recent Results Cancer Res 2011; 183: 207-238
  • 6 Fenk R, Neubauer F, Bruns I, Schroder T, Germing U, Haas R et al. Secondary primary malignancies in patients with multiple myeloma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2012; 156: 683-686
  • 7 Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Marit G et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1782-1791
  • 8 McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC et al. Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1770-1781
  • 9 Fayers PM, Palumbo A, Hulin C et al. Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials. Blood 2011; 118: 1239-1247
  • 10 San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 906-917
  • 11 Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Rossi D et al. Overall Survival Benefit for Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance with Bortezomib-Thalidomide (VMPT-VT) Versus Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2012; 120: 200-200
  • 12 Fenk R, Liese V, Neubauer F et al. Predictive factors for successful salvage high-dose therapy in patients with multiple myeloma relapsing after autologous blood stem cell transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma 2011; 52: 1455-1462
  • 13 Richardson PG, Baz R, Wang L, Jakubowiak AJ et al. Investigational Agent MLN9708, An Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results From the Expansion Cohorts of a Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2011; 118: 301-301
  • 14 Richardson PG, Jagannath S, Moreau P et al. A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab (Elo) in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (Ld) in Patients (pts) with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (R/R MM): Updated Results. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2012; 120: 202-202
  • 15 Plesner T, Lokhorst H, Gimsing P et al. Daratumumab, a CD38 Monoclonal Antibody in Patients with Multiple Myeloma – Data From a Dose-Escalation Phase I/II Study. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2012; 120: 73-73