Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2013; 17(03): 229-247
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348090
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Normal Anatomy and Imaging of the Hip: Emphasis on Impingement Assessment

Mary Kristen Jesse
1   Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
,
Brian Petersen
2   Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology and Orthopaedics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
,
Colin Strickland
1   Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
,
Omer Mei-Dan
3   Division of Sports Medicine and Hip Preservation, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 June 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

A comprehensive knowledge of normal hip anatomy and imaging techniques is essential in the evaluation and assessment of the patient with hip pain. This article reviews the osseous, soft tissue, and vascular components of the hip and the normal anatomical variants encountered in routine hip imaging. Basic and advanced hip imaging is discussed with particular emphasis on radiographic and computed tomography measurements and their utility in evaluating patients with developmental hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Keywords

hip anatomy - hip imaging - femoroacetabular impingement measurements - hip dysplasia measurements
 

  • References

  • 1 Brückl R, Tönnis D. The growth of the juvenile hip joint. A planimetric study of x-ray films (author's transl) [in German]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1979; 93 (2) 149-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wierusz-Kozłowska M, Ziemiański A, Kruczyński J, Borkowski W. Development of the normal infantile hip joints assessed by MRI [in Polish]. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 2000; 65 (1) 25-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wyler A, Bousson V, Bergot C , et al. Comparison of MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography in hyaline cartilage-thickness measurement in radiographically normal cadaver hips with anatomy as gold standard. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17 (1) 19-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Dietrich TJ, Suter A, Pfirrmann CW, Dora C, Fucentese SF, Zanetti M. Supraacetabular fossa (pseudodefect of acetabular cartilage): frequency at MR arthrography and comparison of findings at MR arthrography and arthroscopy. Radiology 2012; 263 (2) 484-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hergan K, Oser W, Moriggl B. Acetabular ossicles: normal variant or disease entity?. Eur Radiol 2000; 10 (4) 624-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Arho AO. Accessory bones of extremities in roentgen picture. Duodecim 1940; 56: 399-410
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Martinez AE, Li SM, Ganz R, Beck M. Os acetabuli in femoro-acetabular impingement: stress fracture or unfused secondary ossification centre of the acetabular rim?. Hip Int 2006; 16 (4) 281-286
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kassarjian A, Yoon LS, Belzile E, Connolly SA, Millis MB, Palmer WE. Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology 2005; 236 (2) 588-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Klaue K, Durnin CW, Ganz R. The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73 (3) 423-429
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cooke WR, Gill HS, Murray DW, Ostlere SJ. Discrete mineralisation of the acetabular labrum: a novel marker of femoroacetabular impingement?. Br J Radiol 2013; 86 (1021) 20120182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Smith MV, Panchal HB, Ruberte Thiele RA, Sekiya JK. Effect of acetabular labrum tears on hip stability and labral strain in a joint compression model. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (Suppl): 103S-110S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Edwards DJ, Lomas D, Villar RN. Diagnosis of the painful hip by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77 (3) 374-376
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Petersilge CA, Haque MA, Petersilge WJ, Lewin JS, Lieberman JM, Buly R. Acetabular labral tears: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 1996; 200 (1) 231-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cotten A, Boutry N, Demondion X , et al. Acetabular labrum: MRI in asymptomatic volunteers. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22 (1) 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gerhardt M, Johnson K, Atkinson R , et al. Characterisation and classification of the neural anatomy in the human hip joint. Hip Int 2012; 22 (1) 75-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Petersilge C. Imaging of the acetabular labrum. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005; 13 (4) 641-652 , vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Groh MM, Herrera J. A comprehensive review of hip labral tears. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2009; 2 (2) 105-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Malghem J , et al. MR imaging of the acetabular labrum: variations in 200 asymptomatic hips. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167 (4) 1025-1028
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hodler J, Yu JS, Goodwin D, Haghighi P, Trudell D, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the hip: improved imaging of the acetabular labrum with histologic correlation in cadavers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165 (4) 887-891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Czerny C, Hofmann S, Urban M , et al. MR arthrography of the adult acetabular capsular-labral complex: correlation with surgery and anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173 (2) 345-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Aydingöz U, Oztürk MH. MR imaging of the acetabular labrum: a comparative study of both hips in 180 asymptomatic volunteers. Eur Radiol 2001; 11 (4) 567-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Studler U, Kalberer F, Leunig M , et al. MR arthrography of the hip: differentiation between an anterior sublabral recess as a normal variant and a labral tear. Radiology 2008; 249 (3) 947-954
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 DuBois DF, Omar IM. MR imaging of the hip: normal anatomic variants and imaging pitfalls. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010; 18 (4) 663-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Saddik D, Troupis J, Tirman P, O'Donnell J, Howells R. Prevalence and location of acetabular sublabral sulci at hip arthroscopy with retrospective MRI review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (5) W507-W11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Dinauer PA, Murphy KP, Carroll JF. Sublabral sulcus at the posteroinferior acetabulum: a potential pitfall in MR arthrography diagnosis of acetabular labral tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183 (6) 1745-1753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Smith MV, Costic RS, Allaire R, Schilling PL, Sekiya JK. A biomechanical analysis of the soft tissue and osseous constraints of the hip joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; ; October 30 (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fuss FK, Bacher A. New aspects of the morphology and function of the human hip joint ligaments. Am J Anat 1991; 192 (1) 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wagner FV, Negrão JR, Campos J , et al. Capsular ligaments of the hip: anatomic, histologic, and positional study in cadaveric specimens with MR arthrography. Radiology 2012; 263 (1) 189-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Martin RL, Kivlan BR, Clemente FR. A cadaveric model for ligamentum teres function: a pilot study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; ; November 2 (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Keene GS, Villar RN. Arthroscopic anatomy of the hip: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy 1994; 10 (4) 392-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gray AJ, Villar RN. The ligamentum teres of the hip: an arthroscopic classification of its pathology. Arthroscopy 1997; 13 (5) 575-578
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Armfield DR, Towers JD, Robertson DD. Radiographic and MR imaging of the athletic hip. Clin Sports Med 2006; 25 (2) 211-239 , viii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Demange M. Influence of the femoral head ligament on hip mechanical function. Acta Ortop Bras. 2007; 15 (4) 187-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Remes V, Tervahartiala P, Helenius I, Peltonen J. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of hip joint development in patients with diastrophic dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop 2002; 22 (2) 212-216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Fu Z, Peng M, Peng Q. Anatomical study of the synovial plicae of the hip joint. Clin Anat 1997; 10 (4) 235-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Bencardino JT, Kassarjian A, Vieira RL, Schwartz R, Mellado JM, Kocher M. Synovial plicae of the hip: evaluation using MR arthrography in patients with hip pain. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40 (4) 415-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bartonícek J. Weitbrecht's retinacula of the hip joint [in Czech]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 1990; 57 (5) 385-391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Blankenbaker DG, Davis KW, De Smet AA, Keene JS. MRI appearance of the pectinofoveal fold. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192 (1) 93-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Tatu L, Parratte B, Vuillier F, Diop M, Monnier G. Descriptive anatomy of the femoral portion of the iliopsoas muscle. Anatomical basis of anterior snapping of the hip. Surg Radiol Anat 2001; 23 (6) 371-374
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Guillin R, Cardinal E, Bureau NJ. Sonographic anatomy and dynamic study of the normal iliopsoas musculotendinous junction. Eur Radiol 2009; 19 (4) 995-1001
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Shu B, Safran MR. Case report: Bifid iliopsoas tendon causing refractory internal snapping hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (1) 289-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Spratt JD, Logan BM, Abrahams PH. Variant slips of psoas and iliacus muscles, with splitting of the femoral nerve. Clin Anat 1996; 9 (6) 401-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Chander S. The iliopsoas bursa in man. Anat Rec 1934; 36: 235-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Varma DG, Richli WR, Charnsangavej C, Samuels BI, Kim EE, Wallace S. MR appearance of the distended iliopsoas bursa. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156 (5) 1025-1028
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Woodley SJ, Mercer SR, Nicholson HD. Morphology of the bursae associated with the greater trochanter of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (2) 284-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Kassarjian A, Llopis E, Schwartz RB, Bencardino JT. Obturator externus bursa: prevalence of communication with the hip joint and associated intra-articular findings in 200 consecutive hip MR arthrograms. Eur Radiol 2009; 19 (11) 2779-2782
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Troelsen A, Jacobsen S, Rømer L, Søballe K. Weightbearing anteroposterior pelvic radiographs are recommended in DDH assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (4) 813-819
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis—what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (6) 1540-1552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaulé PE , et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (Suppl. 04) 47-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Barton C, Salineros MJ, Rakhra KS, Beaulé PE. Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (2) 464-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Lequesne M , de SEZE. False profile of the pelvis. A new radiographic incidence for the study of the hip. Its use in dysplasias and different coxopathies. [in French]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1961; 28: 643-652
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Chan YS, Lien LC, Hsu HL , et al. Evaluating hip labral tears using magnetic resonance arthrography: a prospective study comparing hip arthroscopy and magnetic resonance arthrography diagnosis. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (10) 1250
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Czerny C, Hofmann S, Neuhold A , et al. Lesions of the acetabular labrum: accuracy of MR imaging and MR arthrography in detection and staging. Radiology 1996; 200 (1) 225-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Leunig M, Werlen S, Ungersböck A, Ito K, Ganz R. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79 (2) 230-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Toomayan GA, Holman WR, Major NM, Kozlowicz SM, Vail TP. Sensitivity of MR arthrography in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186 (2) 449-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Plötz GM, Brossmann J, von Knoch M, Muhle C, Heller M, Hassenpflug J. Magnetic resonance arthrography of the acetabular labrum: value of radial reconstructions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001; 121 (8) 450-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Yoon LS, Palmer WE, Kassarjian A. Evaluation of radial-sequence imaging in detecting acetabular labral tears at hip MR arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 2007; 36 (11) 1029-1033
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Zlatkin MB, Pevsner D, Sanders TG, Hancock CR, Ceballos CE, Herrera MF. Acetabular labral tears and cartilage lesions of the hip: indirect MR arthrographic correlation with arthroscopy—a preliminary study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (3) 709-714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Vahlensieck M, Peterfy CG, Wischer T , et al. Indirect MR arthrography: optimization and clinical applications. Radiology 1996; 200 (1) 249-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Pozzi G, Stradiotti P, Parra CG, Zagra L, Sironi S, Zerbi A. Femoro-acetabular impingement: can indirect MR arthrography be considered a valid method to detect endoarticular damage? A preliminary study. Hip Int 2009; 19 (4) 386-391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Dolan MM, Heyworth BE, Bedi A, Duke G, Kelly BT. CT reveals a high incidence of osseous abnormalities in hips with labral tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (3) 831-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Jin W, Kim KI, Rhyu KH , et al. Sonographic evaluation of anterosuperior hip labral tears with magnetic resonance arthrographic and surgical correlation. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31 (3) 439-447
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Robben SG, Lequin MH, Diepstraten AF, den Hollander JC, Entius CA, Meradji M. Anterior joint capsule of the normal hip and in children with transient synovitis: US study with anatomic and histologic correlation. Radiology 1999; 210 (2) 499-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Troelsen A, Mechlenburg I, Gelineck J, Bolvig L, Jacobsen S, Søballe K. What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics?. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (3) 314-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Fredensborg N, Nilsson BE. The joint space in normal hip radiographs. Radiology 1978; 126 (2) 325-326
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Ogata S, Moriya H, Tsuchiya K, Akita T, Kamegaya M, Someya M. Acetabular cover in congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72 (2) 190-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Omeroglu H, Biçimoglu A, Aguş H, Tümer Y. Measurement of center-edge angle in developmental dysplasia of the hip: a comparison of two methods in patients under 20 years of age. Skeletal Radiol 2002; 31 (1) 25-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Søballe K, Gebuhr P, Lund B. Hip dysplasia and osteoarthrosis: a survey of 4151 subjects from the Osteoarthrosis Substudy of the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Acta Orthop 2005; 76 (2) 149-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Pedersen DR, Lamb CA, Dolan LA, Ralston HM, Weinstein SL, Morcuende JA. Radiographic measurements in developmental dysplasia of the hip: reliability and validity of a digitizing program. J Pediatr Orthop 2004; 24 (2) 156-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Umer M, Sepah YJ, Asif S, Azam I, Jawad MU. Acetabular morphometry and prevalence of hip dysplasia in the South Asian population. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2009; 1 (1) e10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Sharp I. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961; 43-B (2) 268-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Jamali AA, Mladenov K, Meyer DC , et al. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the “cross-over-sign”. J Orthop Res 2007; 25 (6) 758-765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81 (2) 281-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Tönnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81 (12) 1747-1770
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Reikerås O, Bjerkreim I, Kolbenstvedt A. Anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral neck in normals and in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand 1983; 54 (1) 18-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 McKibbin B. Anatomical factors in the stability of the hip joint in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1970; 52 (1) 148-159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Li PL, Ganz R. Morphologic features of congenital acetabular dysplasia: one in six is retroverted. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (416) 245-253
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Salter RB. The classic. Innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip by Robert B. Salter, J. Bone Joint Surg. (Brit) 43B:3:518, 1961. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978; 137 (137) 2-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, Ganz R, Leunig M. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis : a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (3) 677-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (4) 556-560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 445: 181-185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Nepple JJ, Martel JM, Kim YJ, Zaltz I, Clohisy JC. ANCHOR Study Group. Do plain radiographs correlate with CT for imaging of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (12) 3313-3320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR , et al. Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (1) 134-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Ito K, Minka II MA, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (2) 171-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Gelberman RH, Cohen MS, Shaw BA, Kasser JR, Griffin PP, Wilkinson RH. The association of femoral retroversion with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (7) 1000-1007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Tönnis D, Heinecke A. Diminished femoral antetorsion syndrome: a cause of pain and osteoarthritis. J Pediatr Orthop 1991; 11 (4) 419-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Saikia KC, Bhuyan SK, Rongphar R. Anthropometric study of the hip joint in northeastern region population with computed tomography scan. Indian J Orthop 2008; 42 (3) 260-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Mesgarzadeh M, Revesz G, Bonakdarpour A. Femoral neck torsion angle measurement by computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11 (5) 799-803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Sutter R, Dietrich TJ, Zingg PO, Pfirrmann CW. Femoral antetorsion: comparing asymptomatic volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology 2012; 263 (2) 475-483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Maheshwari AV, Zlowodzki MP, Siram G, Jain AK. Femoral neck anteversion, acetabular anteversion and combined anteversion in the normal Indian adult population: a computed tomographic study. Indian J Orthop 2010; 44 (3) 277-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Kim HD, Lee DS, Eom MJ, Hwang JS, Han NM, Jo GY. Relationship between physical examinations and two-dimensional computed tomographic findings in children with intoeing gait. Ann Rehabil Med 2011; 35 (4) 491-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Schneider B, Laubenberger J, Jemlich S, Groene K, Weber HM, Langer M. Measurement of femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1997; 70 (834) 575-579
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Tomczak RJ, Guenther KP, Rieber A, Mergo P, Ros PR, Brambs HJ. MR imaging measurement of the femoral antetorsional angle as a new technique: comparison with CT in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168 (3) 791-794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Coleman SS. Diagnosis of congenital dysplasia of the hip in the newborn infant. J Am Med Assoc 1956; 162 (6) 548-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Eckhoff DG. Variation in femoral anteversion. Clin Anat 1994; 7 (2) 72-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Wiberg G. Studies on dyspastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. With special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand 1939; 83 (Suppl. 58) 28-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Maruyama M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D'Antonio JA. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (393) 52-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Toogood PA, Skalak A, Cooperman DR. Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (4) 876-885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Buller LT, Rosneck J, Monaco FM, Butler R, Smith T, Barsoum WK. Relationship between proximal femoral and acetabular alignment in normal hip joints using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (2) 367-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Hetsroni I, Dela Torre K, Duke G, Lyman S, Kelly BT. Sex differences of hip morphology in young adults with hip pain and labral tears. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (1) 54-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar