Event Management: The Heart of the Quality Program

Abstract

Learning from mistakes or failures is the purpose of a laboratory's event management system. Laboratories that systematically and effectively learn from failures which occur especially from small mistakes and problems rather than from consequential adverse events, are rare. An effective event management program often requires a cultural sea change that emphasizes a process of detection and reporting of errors that is without reprisal. An approach to development of such an event management program is described in this article. Steps of event management including engagement of the staff, tools used, steps of evaluation, application to all elements of laboratory management, and culture change necessary are discussed.

Keywords

quality - error - failure - Quality System Essentials

• References

• 1 Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S , et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49 (7) 1113-1126
• 2 Lippi G, Guidi GC, Mattiuzzi C, Plebani M. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006; 44 (4) 358-365
• 3 Favaloro EJ, Lippi G, Adcock DM. Preanalytical and postanalytical variables: the leading causes of diagnostic error in hemostasis?. Semin Thromb Hemost 2008; 34 (7) 612-634
• 4 Edmondson AC. Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13 (Suppl. 02) ii3-ii9
• 5 CLSI. Management of Nonconforming Laboratory Events; Approved Guideline. CLSI document GP32-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007
• 6 Lippi G, Bonelli P, Rossi R , et al. Development of a preanalytical errors recording software. Biochem Med 2010; 20 (1) 90-95
• 7 Lippi G, Banfi G, Buttarello M , et al. Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007; 45 (6) 728-736
• 8 Lippi G, Plebani M, Simundic AM. Quality in laboratory diagnostics: from theory to practice. Biochem Med 2010; 20 (2) 126-130
• 9 Rooney JJ, Vanden Heuvel LN. Root Cause Analysis for Beginners. Quality Progress July 2004; Available at: https://webspace.utexas.edu/mae548/www/research/digital%20forensics/qp0704rooney.pdf . Accessed June 26, 2012
• 10 Lippi G. Governance of preanalytical variability: travelling the right path to the bright side of the moon?. Clin Chim Acta 2009; 404 (1) 32-36
• 11 Plebani M, Lippi G. Closing the brain-to-brain loop in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49 (7) 1131-1133
• 12 Bonar R, Favaloro EJ, Adcock DM. Quality in coagulation and haemostasis testing. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2010; 20 (2) 184-199
• 13 NCCLS. A Quality Management System Model for Health Care; Approved Guideline. 2nd ed. NCCLS document HS1–A2. Wayne, PA: NCCLS; 2004
• 14 Motschman TL, Jett BW, Wilkinson SL. Quality systems: theory and practice. In: Roback JD, Grossman BJ, Harris T, Hillyer CD, , eds. Technical Manual. 17th ed. Bethesda, MD: AABB; 2011: 1-39
• 15 ISO. Medical Laboratories-Particular Requirements for Quality and Competence. ISO 15189. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2003
• 16 Edmondson AC. Strategies of learning from failure. Harv Bus Rev 2011; 89 (4) 48-55 , 137
• 17 DeAguayo R. Deming: the American who taught the Japanese about quality. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 1990: 1-66
• 18 Krouwer JS, Cembrowski GS. Towards more complete specifications for acceptable analytical performance - a plea for error grid analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49 (7) 1127-1130
• 19 Cooper G, DeJonge N, Ehrmeyer S , et al. Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2010 convocation of experts on laboratory quality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49 (5) 793-802