J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73(03): 175-182
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311755
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Superior Transvelar Approach to the Fourth Ventricle and Brainstem

Haim Ezer
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
,
Anirban Deep Banerjee
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
,
Papireddy Bollam
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
,
Bharat Guthikonda
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
,
Anil Nanda
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

14 September 2010

22 March 2011

Publication Date:
07 May 2012 (online)

Abstract

Objective The superior transvelar approach is used to access pathologies located in the fourth ventricle and brainstem. The surgical path is below the venous structures, through the superior medullary velum. Following splitting the tentorial edge, near the tentorial apex, the superior medullary velum is split in the cerebello-mesencephalic fissure. Using the supracerebellar infratentorial, transtentorial or parietal interhemispheric routes, the superior medullary velum is approached. Splitting this velum provides a detailed view of the fourth ventricle and its floor.

Materials and Methods A total of 10 formalin-fixed specimens were dissected in a stepwise manner to simulate the superior transvelar approach to the fourth ventricle. The exposure gained the distance from the craniotomy site and the ease of access was assessed for each of the routes. We also present an illustrative case, operated by the senior author (AN).

Results The superior transvelar approach provides access to the entire length of the fourth ventricle floor, from the aqueduct to the obex, when using the parietal interhemispheric route. In addition, this approach provides access to the entire width of the floor of the fourth ventricle; however, this requires retracting the superior cerebellar peduncle. Using the supracerebellar infratentorial route gives a limited exposure of the superior part of the fourth ventricle. The occipital interhemispheric route is a compromise between these two.

Conclusion The superior transvelar approach to the fourth ventricle provides a route for approaching the fourth ventricle from above. This approach does not require opening the posterior fossa in the traditional way, and provides a reasonable alternative for accessing the superior fourth ventricle.

 
  • References

  • 1 Tanriover N, Ulm AJ, Rhoton Jr AL, Yasuda A. Comparison of the transvermian and telovelar approaches to the fourth ventricle. J Neurosurg 2004; 101 (3) 484-498
  • 2 Dubey A, Sung WS, Shaya M , et al. Complications of posterior cranial fossa surgery—an institutional experience of 500 patients. Surg Neurol 2009; 72 (4) 369-375
  • 3 Doxey D, Bruce D, Sklar F, Swift D, Shapiro K. Posterior fossa syndrome: identifiable risk factors and irreversible complications. Pediatr Neurosurg 1999; 31 (3) 131-136
  • 4 Patir R, Mahapatra AK, Banerji AK. Risk factors in postoperative neurosurgical infection. A prospective study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1992; 119 (1–4) 80-84
  • 5 Dailey AT, McKhann II GM, Berger MS. The pathophysiology of oral pharyngeal apraxia and mutism following posterior fossa tumor resection in children. J Neurosurg 1995; 83 (3) 467-475
  • 6 Brown AP, Thompson BG, Spetzler RF. The two-point method: evaluating brainstem lesions. BNI Q 1996; 12 (1) 20-24
  • 7 Dammers R, Delwel EJ, Krisht AF. Cavernous hemangioma of the mesencephalon: tonsillouveal transaqueductal approach. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5, Suppl 2) 296-299 , discussion 299–300
  • 8 Porter RWDP, Spetzler RF. Infratentorial cavernous malformations. In: Winn HR, Youmans JR, eds. Youmans Neurological Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004: 2327
  • 9 Tompsett DH. Anatomical Techniques. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: E & S Livingstone; 1970: xvii , 283
  • 10 Gray H, Lewis WH. Anatomy of the Human Body. 20th ed. New York: Bartleby.com; 2000
  • 11 Rhoton Jr AL. Cerebellum and fourth ventricle. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (3, Suppl) S7-S27
  • 12 Gray H, Williams PL, Bannister LH. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Medicine and Surgery. 38th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995: xx , 2092
  • 13 Tubbs RS, Wellons III JC, Salter G, Oakes WJ. Fenestration of the superior medullary velum as treatment for a trapped fourth ventricle: a feasibility study. Clin Anat 2004; 17 (2) 82-87
  • 14 Rhoton Jr AL. The cerebellar arteries. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (3, Suppl) S29-S68
  • 15 Rhoton Jr AL. The posterior fossa veins. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (3, Suppl) S69-S92
  • 16 Kawashima M, Rhoton Jr AL, Matsushima T. Comparison of posterior approaches to the posterior incisural space: microsurgical anatomy and proposal of a new method, the occipital bi-transtentorial/falcine approach. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (5) 1208-1220 , discussion 1220–1221
  • 17 Rhoton Jr AL, Yamamoto I, Peace DA. Microsurgery of the third ventricle: Part 2. Operative approaches. Neurosurgery 1981; 8 (3) 357-373
  • 18 Leblanc A. The Cranial Nerves: Anatomy, Imaging, Vascularisation. 2nd enl. ed. Berlin, New York: Springer; 1995: 297
  • 19 Schmidek HH, Roberts DW. Schmidek & Sweet Operative Neurosurgical Techniques: Indications, Methods, and Results. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006: xxxix , 2337, 2367
  • 20 Greenberg MS. Handbook of Neurosurgery. 5th ed. New York: Greenberg Graphics; Thieme Medical Publishers; 2001. x, 971
  • 21 de Oliveira JG, Lekovic GP, Safavi-Abbasi S , et al. Supracerebellar infratentorial approach to cavernous malformations of the brainstem: surgical variants and clinical experience with 45 patients. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (2) 389-399
  • 22 Ausman JI, Malik GM, Dujovny M, Mann R. Three-quarter prone approach to the pineal-tentorial region. Surg Neurol 1988; 29 (4) 298-306
  • 23 Chi JH, Lawton MT. Posterior interhemispheric approach: surgical technique, application to vascular lesions, and benefits of gravity retraction. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (1, Suppl 1) ONS41-ONS49 , discussion ONS41–ONS49
  • 24 Kurokawa Y, Uede T, Hashi K. Operative approach to mediosuperior cerebellar tumors: occipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach. Surg Neurol 1999; 51 (4) 421-425
  • 25 Nazzaro JM, Shults WT, Neuwelt EA. Neuro-ophthalmological function of patients with pineal region tumors approached transtentorially in the semisitting position. J Neurosurg 1992; 76 (5) 746-751
  • 26 Moshel YA, Parker EC, Kelly PJ. Occipital transtentorial approach to the precentral cerebellar fissure and posterior incisural space. Neurosurgery 2009; 65 (3) 554-564 , discussion 564
  • 27 Clark WK. Occipital transtentorial approach. In: Apuzzo MLJ, ed. Surgery of the Third Ventricle. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1987: 591-625
  • 28 Lawton MT, Golfinos JG, Spetzler RF. The contralateral transcallosal approach: experience with 32 patients. Neurosurgery 1996; 39 (4) 729-734 , discussion 734–735
  • 29 Rhoton Jr AL. Tentorial incisura. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (3, Suppl) S131-S153