Knochenverlust nach Implantation: neuer Standard gefragt

Als Standardnorm für eine erfolgreiche Implantatversorgung gilt seit 1986 eine Resorption des marginalen Knochens von bis zu 1,5 mm innerhalb von 5 Jahren [1]. Die hier beschriebenen Fallbeispiele zeigen jedoch, dass sich mit den heutigen Implantatsystemen deutlich bessere Ergebnisse erzielen lassen. So dokumentieren 40 Studien, dass eine mittlere Veränderung des Knochenniveaus von nur 0,3 mm möglich ist [2] [3] [4] [6] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [16].

Literatur

• 1 Albrektsson T. et al. . The long–term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;  1 11-25
• 2 Cooper L. et al. . A multicenter 12–month evaluation of single–tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1 stage surgery.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;  16 182-192
• 3 Cooper L. et al. . Three–year evaluation of single tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1–stage surgery.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;  22 791-800
• 4 Donati M. et al. . Immediate functional loading of implants in single tooth replacement. A prospective clinical multicenter study.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;  19 740-748
• 5 Frost HM.. Scelet structural adaptations to mechanical usage. Redefining Wolff's law: The bone modeling problem.  Anat Rec. 1990;  226 403-413
• 6 Gotfredsen K.. A 5–year prospective study of single–tooth replacements supported by the Astra Tech Implant: A pilot study.  Clin Implants Dent Rel Res. 2004;  6 1-8
• 7 Hansson S.. A conical implant–abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;  14 286-293
• 8 Karlsson U. et al. . Single–tooth replacement by osseointegrated Astra Tech dental implants: A 2–year report.  Int J Prosthodont. 1997;  10 318-324
• 9 Lee DW. et al. . Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3–year prospective study.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;  18 465-470
• 10 Nordin T, Jonsson G, Nelvig P. et al. . The use of a conical fixture design for fixed partial prostheses. A preliminary report.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;  9 343-347
• 11 Norton MR.. A short–term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single–tooth implants.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;  19 274-281
• 12 Palmer RM. et al. . A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;  8 173-179
• 13 Palmer RM. et al. . A 5–year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;  1 179-182
• 14 Palmer RM. et al. . A prospective 3–year study of fixed bridges linking Astra Tech ST implants to natural teeth.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;  16 302-307
• 15 Stanford C. et al. . Outcomes of a fluoride modified implant one year after loading in the posterior–maxilla when placed with the osteotome surgical technique.  Appl Osseointegration Res. 2006;  5 62-67
• 16 Wennström JL. et al. . Implant–supported singletooth restorations: a 5–year prospective study.  J Clin Periodontol. 2005;  32 567-574
• 17 Zipprich H. et al. . Micro–movements at the implant–abutment interface: measurement, causes, and consequences.  Implantologie. 2007;  17 31-45

Korrespondenzadresse