Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2772-4697
Original Article

Supercharged Pedicled Jejunal Interposition for Esophageal Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Adult and Pediatric Patients

Authors

  • Evan J. Haas 

    1   Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States

  • Kumar Thurimella

    1   Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States

  • Yasaman Baghshomali

    1   Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States

  • Katie Egan 

    2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States

  • Christodoulos Kaoutzanis

    2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States

  • Tim Irwin

    2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States

  • Martin McCarter

    3   Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States

  • Elizabeth A. David

    4   Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States

  • David W. Mathes

    2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States

  • Jason W. Yu

    2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background

This study aims to compare demographic, risk, and complication profiles of pediatric and adult patients who underwent supercharged pedicled jejunal interposition for esophageal reconstruction.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed, which included patients who underwent esophageal reconstruction with supercharged jejunum from 23 published studies. Patients were divided into two groups: pediatric/young adults (≤18 years), and adults (>18 years). The primary outcome was postoperative complications. Python 3.11 with pandas was used for data management, scikit-learn for Ridge regression and imputation of missing values, and SciPy for statistical analysis. Ridge regression analysis was utilized with regularization (α = 0.1), while examining the relationship between demographic factors and overall complication rates in adult patients to account for limited sample sizes.

Results

A total of 254 manuscripts were reviewed, and 23 studies met inclusion criteria. Of 477 included patients, 415 were adults (87%) and 62 were pediatric patients (13%). Adult patients had significantly higher odds of developing an anastomotic leak (OR 8.63, p < 0.01) and dysphagia (5.99, p < 0.02) following surgery. Preoperative radiation was positively associated with postoperative dumping symptoms (β = 0.56), stricture formation (β = 0.27), poor wound healing (β = 0.27), and need for reoperation (β = 0.27). A history of cancer was most positively associated with anastomotic leak (β = 0.22) following surgery. Preoperative radiation was positively associated with anastomotic leak (β = 0.12). Smoking demonstrated a strong inverse association with the need for reoperation (β = − 0.66), and a weaker inverse association with leakage (β = − 0.25).

Conclusion

Adult patients have a significantly greater likelihood of experiencing postoperative anastomotic leakage and dysphagia compared with pediatric patients. Preoperative radiation was associated with dumping symptoms, stricture, need for reoperation, poor wound healing, and pulmonary complications. Smoking was associated with decreased need for reoperation and anastomotic leakage.

Keywords

supercharged pedicled jejunum - jejunal interposition - esophageal reconstruction - pediatric microsurgery - conduit

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 18 July 2025

Accepted: 19 November 2025

Article published online:
14 January 2026

© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Wu MH, Lai WW. Esophageal reconstruction for esophageal strictures or resection after corrosive injury. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 53 (05) 798-802
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Dowson HMP, Strauss D, Ng R, Mason R. The acute management and surgical reconstruction following failed esophagectomy in malignant disease of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2007; 20 (02) 135-140
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Luan A, Hunter CL, Crowe CS, Lee GK. Comparison of outcomes of total esophageal reconstruction with supercharged jejunal flap, colonic interposition, and gastric pull-up. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (5S, Suppl 5): S274-S278
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Merritt RE. Conduit selection for reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2024; 33 (03) 549-556
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Longmire Jr WP. A modification of the Roux technique for antethoracic esophageal reconstruction. Surgery 1947; 22 (01) 94-100
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Swisher SG, Hofstetter WL, Miller MJ. The supercharged microvascular jejunal interposition. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 19 (01) 56-65
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Sekido M, Yamamoto Y, Minakawa H. et al. Use of the “supercharge” technique in esophageal and pharyngeal reconstruction to augment microvascular blood flow. Surgery 2003; 134 (03) 420-424
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Gaur P, Blackmon SH. Jejunal graft conduits after esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 2014; 6 (Suppl 3): S333-S340
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Marks JL, Hofstetter WL. Esophageal reconstruction with alternative conduits. Surg Clin North Am 2012; 92 (05) 1287-1297
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Chen HC, Rampazzo A, Gharb BB. et al. Motility differences in free colon and free jejunum flaps for reconstruction of the cervical esophagus. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (05) 1410-1416
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Smith RW, Garvey CJ, Dawson PM, Davies DM. Jejunum versus colon for free oesophageal reconstruction: an experimental radiological assessment. Br J Plast Surg 1987; 40 (02) 181-187
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Stephens EH, Gaur P, Hotze KO, Correa AM, Kim MP, Blackmon SH. Super-charged pedicled jejunal interposition performance compares favorably with a gastric conduit after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 100 (02) 407-413
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Ascioti AJ, Hofstetter WL, Miller MJ. et al. Long-segment, supercharged, pedicled jejunal flap for total esophageal reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130 (05) 1391-1398
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Mohan AT, Mahajan NN, Mardini S, Blackmon SH. Outcomes of standardized protocols in supercharged pedicled jejunal esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115 (01) 210-219
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Firriolo JM, Nuzzi LC, Ganske IM. et al. Supercharged jejunal interposition: a reliable esophageal replacement in pediatric patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (06) 1266e-1276e
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62 (10) e1-e34
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Clark JM, Sanders S, Carter M. et al. Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Libr Assoc 2020; 108 (02) 195-207
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, McKenzie JE, Veroniki AA. ; on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses | Cochrane Training. Accessed March 27, 2025 at: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-10
  • 19 Baker CR, Forshaw MJ, Gossage JA, Ng R, Mason RC. Long-term outcome and quality of life after supercharged jejunal interposition for oesophageal replacement. Surgeon 2015; 13 (04) 187-193
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Barzin A, Norton JA, Whyte R, Lee GK. Supercharged jejunum flap for total esophageal reconstruction: single-surgeon 3-year experience and outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 173-180
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Blackmon SH, Correa AM, Skoracki R. et al. Supercharged pedicled jejunal interposition for esophageal replacement: a 10-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94 (04) 1104-1111 , discussion 1111–1113
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Chana JSMD, Chen HCMD, Sharma R, Gedebou TMMD, Feng GMMD. Microsurgical reconstruction of the esophagus using supercharged pedicled jejunum flaps: special indications and pitfalls. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (03) 742-748 , discussion 749–750
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Doki Y, Okada K, Miyata H. et al. Long-term and short-term evaluation of esophageal reconstruction using the colon or the jejunum in esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy. Dis Esophagus 2008; 21 (02) 132-138
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Farran L, López-Ojeda A, Barrios O. et al. Role of jejunoplasty in complex esophageal reconstruction. Cir Esp (Engl Ed) 2022; 100 (12) 762-767
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Ganske IM, Firriolo JM, Nuzzi LC. et al. Double supercharged jejunal interposition for late salvage of long-gap esophageal atresia. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 81 (05) 553-559
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Ghali S, Chang EI, Rice DC, Walsh GL, Yu P. Microsurgical reconstruction of combined tracheal and total esophageal defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 150 (05) 1261-1266
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Iwata N, Koike M, Kamei Y. et al. Antethoracic pedicled jejunum reconstruction with the supercharge technique for esophageal cancer. World J Surg 2012; 36 (11) 2622-2629
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Jiang S, Guo C, Zou B. et al. Comparison of outcomes of pedicled jejunal and colonic conduit for esophageal reconstruction. BMC Surg 2020; 20 (01) 156
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Mays AC, Yu P, Hofstetter W. et al. The supercharged pedicled jejunal flap for total esophageal reconstruction: a retrospective review of 100 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (05) 1171-1180
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Nakamura T, Yamamoto M, Yamazato T. et al. Surgical strategy of esophageal resection and reconstruction for aortoesophageal fistula. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30 (09) 1-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Poh M, Selber JC, Skoracki R, Walsh GL, Yu P. Technical challenges of total esophageal reconstruction using a supercharged jejunal flap. Ann Surg 2011; 253 (06) 1122-1129
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Ueda K, Kajikawa A, Suzuki Y, Okazaki M, Nakagawa M, Iida S. Blood gas analysis of the jejunum in the supercharge technique: to what degree does circulation improve?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (06) 1745-1750
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 33 Umezawa H, Nakao J, Matsutani T, Kuwahara H, Taga M, Ogawa R. Usefulness of the Clavien-Dindo classification in understanding the limitations and indications of larynx-preserving esophageal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (11) e1113
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Bairdain S, Foker JE, Smithers CJ. et al. Jejunal interposition after failed esophageal atresia repair. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222 (06) 1001-1008
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 35 Cauchi JA, Buick RG, Gornall P, Simms MH, Parikh DH. Oesophageal substitution with free and pedicled jejunum: short- and long-term outcomes. Pediatr Surg Int 2007; 23 (01) 11-19
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Thompson K, Zendejas B, Svetanoff WJ. et al. Evolution, lessons learned, and contemporary outcomes of esophageal replacement with jejunum for children. Surgery 2021; 170 (01) 114-125
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 37 Sullivan MC, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Does chemotherapy prior to emergency surgery affect patient outcomes? Examination of 1912 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (01) 11-18
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 38 Boal DKB, Newburger PE, Teele RL. Esophagitis induced by combined radiation and adriamycin. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979; 132 (04) 567-570
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 39 Little AG, Lerut AE, Harpole DH. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guidelines on the role of multimodality treatment for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98 (05) 1880-1885
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 40 Juloori A, Tucker SL, Komaki R. et al. Influence of preoperative radiation field on postoperative leak rates in esophageal cancer patients after trimodality therapy. J Thorac Oncol 2014; 9 (04) 534-540
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 41 Goense L, van Rossum PSN, Ruurda JP. et al. Radiation to the gastric fundus increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102 (06) 1798-1804
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 42 van Geffen EGM, Neelis KJ, Putter H. et al. Esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiation in esophageal cancer: a safe therapeutic strategy. Dis Esophagus 2024; 37 (11) doae059
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 43 Gronnier C, Tréchot B, Duhamel A. et al; FREGAT Working Group-FRENCH-AFC. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative outcomes after esophageal cancer resection: results of a European multicenter study. Ann Surg 2014; 260 (05) 764-770 , discussion 770–771
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 44 Benz C, Martella J, Hamwi B, Okereke I. Factors resulting in postoperative dysphagia following esophagectomy: a narrative review. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13 (07) 4511-4518
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 45 Pasha SF, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V. et al; ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of dysphagia. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79 (02) 191-201
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 46 Horváth ÖP, Pavlovics G, Cseke L, Vereczkei A, Papp A. Dysphagia after esophageal replacement and its treatment. Dysphagia 2023; 38 (05) 1323-1332
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 47 Movahed S, Norouzy A, Ghanbari-Motlagh A. et al. Nutritional status in patients with esophageal cancer receiving chemoradiation and assessing the efficacy of usual care for nutritional managements. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2020; 21 (08) 2315-2323
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 48 Cristofaro MG, Barca I, Ferragina F. et al. The health risks of dysphagia for patients with head and neck cancer: a multicentre prospective observational study. J Transl Med 2021; 19 (01) 472
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 49 Movahed S, Varshoee Tabrizi F, Pahlavani N. et al. Comprehensive assessment of nutritional status and nutritional-related complications in newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Clin Nutr 2021; 40 (06) 4449-4455
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 50 Grotenhuis BA, Wijnhoven BPL, Grüne F, van Bommel J, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJB. Preoperative risk assessment and prevention of complications in patients with esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2010; 101 (03) 270-278
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 51 Lidoriki I, Mylonas KS, Syllaios A. et al. The impact of nutritional and functional status on postoperative outcomes following esophageal cancer surgery. Nutr Cancer 2022; 74 (08) 2846-2858
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 52 Yu JW, Wong FK, Thompson KM. et al. Overcoming microsurgical anastomotic challenges in supercharged pedicled jejunal interposition for pediatric esophageal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (08) e3780
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 53 Adeniyi-Ipadeola GO, Hankins JD, Kambal A. et al. Infant and adult human intestinal enteroids are morphologically and functionally distinct. MBio 2024; 15 (08) e0131624
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 54 Fujii M, Matano M, Toshimitsu K. et al. Human intestinal organoids maintain self-renewal capacity and cellular diversity in niche-inspired culture condition. Cell Stem Cell 2018; 23 (06) 787-793.e6
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 55 Montero AM, Huang AH. The regenerative capacity of neonatal tissues. Development 2022; 149 (12) dev199819
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 56 Hong SM, Chen Q, Cao H, Hong JJ, Huang JX. Developing a new predictive index for anastomotic leak following the anastomosis of esophageal atresia: preliminary results from a single centre. J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 17 (01) 131
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 57 Hageman JH, Heinz MC, Kretzschmar K, van der Vaart J, Clevers H, Snippert HJG. Intestinal regeneration: regulation by the microenvironment. Dev Cell 2020; 54 (04) 435-446
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 58 Verberk JDM, Meijs AP, Vos MC. et al. Contribution of prior, multiple-, and repetitive surgeries to the risk of surgical site infections in the Netherlands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017; 38 (11) 1298-1305
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 59 Sachdev G, Napolitano LM. Postoperative pulmonary complications: pneumonia and acute respiratory failure. Surg Clin North Am 2012; 92 (02) 321-344 , ix
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 60 Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Okamura H. et al. Risk factors for postoperative respiratory complications following esophageal cancer resection. Oncol Lett 2012; 3 (04) 907-912
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 61 Klevebro F, Elliott JA, Slaman A. et al. Cardiorespiratory comorbidity and postoperative complications following esophagectomy: a European multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (09) 2864-2873
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 62 Guazzi M, Phillips SA, Arena R, Lavie CJ. Endothelial dysfunction and lung capillary injury in cardiovascular diseases. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2015; 57 (05) 454-462
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 63 Borek I, Birnhuber A, Voelkel NF, Marsh LM, Kwapiszewska G. The vascular perspective on acute and chronic lung disease. J Clin Invest 2023; 133 (16) e170502
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 64 Bédard A, Valji RH, Jogiat U. et al. Smoking status predicts anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (08) 4152-4159
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 65 Sørensen LT, Jørgensen T, Kirkeby LT, Skovdal J, Vennits B, Wille-Jørgensen P. Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 1999; 86 (07) 927-931
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 66 Fawcett A, Shembekar M, Church JS, Vashisht R, Springall RG, Nott DM. Smoking, hypertension, and colonic anastomotic healing; a combined clinical and histopathological study. Gut 1996; 38 (05) 714-718
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 67 Scott AM, Kellow JE, Eckersley GM, Nolan JM, Jones MP. Cigarette smoking and nicotine delay postprandial mouth-cecum transit time. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37 (10) 1544-1547
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 68 Yoshida N, Baba Y, Hiyoshi Y. et al. Duration of smoking cessation and postoperative morbidity after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: how long should patients stop smoking before surgery?. World J Surg 2016; 40 (01) 142-147
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 69 Kamarajah SK, Madhavan A, Chmelo J. et al. Impact of smoking status on perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival following transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28 (09) 4905-4915
    Search in Google Scholar