Contact Lens Fitting in Patients with Keratoconus – A Retrospective Assessment of 200 Patients

Abstract

Background and Purpose Nowadays, keratoconus (KC) is very well treatable in a stage-oriented manner. A wide range of designs and materials of contact lenses (CL) are available for the treatment of KC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibilities, the possible challenges and the visual outcome of lens fitting in KC eyes.

Patients and Methods This retrospective study includes data from 200 patients who received a lens fitting trial in our contact lens service between 2006 and 2016. We documented ophthalmological parameters, the type of prescribed CL, the number of required trial lenses and possible causes of the failure of the lens fitting.

Results The mean age at initial lens fitting was 33.9 ± 12.5 years. In 98.8% of the cases, the fitting was performed with rigid gas permeable lenses, in 90.1% with four-curve lenses. Of the total number of aspheric lenses prescribed, 87.5% were fitted in keratoconus stages “1” to “2” (topographic keratoconus classification; Oculus Keratograph). Back surface toric lenses or bitoric lenses were fitted to 61.7% in keratoconus stages “2 – 3” to “4”. Before patients received their final CL, a median of 2 trial lenses were required (max. 16). Mean visual acuity with lens correction was 0.8 ± 0.2 at the initial fitting, mean visual acuity with glasses correction was 0.5 ± 0.3. In 7.7% of the eyes, the KC lens fitting was discontinued due to the advanced stage of keratoconus, requiring a corneal transplant. Reasons for discontinuing contact lens fitting included lens intolerance (2.3%), application problems (0.3%) or acute corneal hydrops (0.3%). Discontinuation of lens wearing due to incompatibilities or application problems occurred in only four cases (1.1%) in the further course after lens fitting.

Conclusions The use of contact lenses is an integral part of the stage-appropriate therapy of keratoconus. Good visual acuity can be achieved in all stages of keratoconus with a low drop-out rate. In most cases, the adjustment is carried out with rigid gas permeable lenses with a four-curve geometry. In initial stages, aspherical lenses may be sufficient. Toric lenses can be fitted in advanced stages when rotationally symmetrical lenses cannot achieve a satisfactory fit. If contact lenses have been successfully fitted, there are only a few cases in which patients abandon their contact lenses because of intolerance.

Key words

contact lenses - keratoconus - retrospective assessment - contact lens fitting

Publication History

Received: 29 March 2021

Accepted: 25 May 2021

Article published online:
03 November 2021

• References/Literatur

• 1 Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 42: 297-319 DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)00119-7.
• 2 Goebels S, Eppig T, Seitz B. et al. Keratokonusprogression im Seitenvergleich. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2017; 234: 1010-1014 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-106300.
• 3 Klühspies U, Grunder A, Goebels S. et al. Keratokonuslinse. Das kleine Korrektionswunder. Ophthalmologe 2013; 110: 830-836 838 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-013-2819-9.
• 4 Downie LE, Lindsay RG. Contact lens management of keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 299-311 DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12300.
• 5 Grünauer-Kloevekorn C. Kontaktlinsenanpassung. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2007
• 6 Rico-Del-Viejo L, Garcia-Montero M, Hernández-Verdejo JL. et al. Nonsurgical procedures for keratoconus management. J Ophthalmol 2017; 2017: 9707650 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9707650.
• 7 Pöltner G. Kontaktlinsenanpassung bei irregulären Hornhautformen. Heidelberg: DOZ; 2013
• 8 Lass JH, Lembach RG, Park SB. et al. Clinical management of keratoconus. A multicenter analysis. Ophthalmology 1990; 97: 433-445 DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32569-1.
• 9 Lim N, Vogt U. Characteristics and functional outcomes of 130 patients with keratoconus attending a specialist contact lens clinic. Eye (Lond) 2002; 16: 54-59 DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700061.
• 10 Kymes SM, Walline JJ, Zadnik K. et al. Quality of life in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138: 527-535 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.04.031.
• 11 Lunardi LH, Arroyo D, Andrade Sobrinho MV. et al. Descriptive analysis of the type and design of contact lenses fitted according to keratoconus severity and morphology. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2016; 79: 82-84 DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160025.
• 12 Zhou AJ, Kitamura K, Weissman BA. Contact lens care in keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2003; 26: 171-174 DOI: 10.1016/S1367-0484(03)00042-0.
• 13 Flockerzi E, Xanthopoulou K, Goebels SC. et al. Keratoconus staging by decades. A baseline ABCD classification of 1000 patients in the Homburg Keratoconus Center. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 105: 1069-1075 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316789.
• 14 Shajari M, Eberhardt E, Müller M. et al. Effects of atopic syndrome on keratoconus. Cornea 2016; 35: 1416-1420 DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000935.
• 15 Lemp MA. Contact lenses and allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 8: 457-460 DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32830e6adc.
• 16 Zadnik K, Barr JT, Edrington TB. et al. Corneal scarring and vision in keratoconus. A baseline report from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Cornea 2000; 19: 804-812 DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200011000-00009.
• 17 Bilgin LK, Yilmaz S, Araz B. et al. 30 years of contact lens prescribing for keratoconic patients in Turkey. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009; 32: 16-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2008.07.001.
• 18 Ortiz-Toquero S, Rodriguez G, de Juan V. et al. New web-based algorithm to improve rigid gas permeable contact lens fitting in keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017; 40: 143-150 DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.12.009.
• 19 Hecht Contactlinsen GmbH. Formstabile Kontaktlinsen. Die KAKC-Familie (01.01.2020). Im Internet (Stand: 25.03.2021): http://katalog.hecht-kontaktlinsen.de/de/catalog/de?navnode=15
• 20 Appenzeller Kontaktlinsen AG. Keratokonus Kontaktlinsen (01.03.2018). Im Internet (Stand: 25.03.2021): https://appenzeller-kontaktlinsen.ch/Appenzeller/productsList?reference=KNQNR3CAD4HHXNR5WVSW%23book11/
• 21 Eppig T, Spira-Eppig C, Goebels S. et al. Asymmetry between Left and Right Eyes in Keratoconus Patients Increases with the Severity of the Worse Eye. Curr Eye Res 2018; 43: 848-855 DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1451545.
• 22 Naderan M, Rajabi MT, Zarrinbakhsh P. Intereye asymmetry in bilateral keratoconus, keratoconus suspect and normal eyes and its relationship with disease severity. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 1475-1482 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309841.
• 23 Fraenkel D, Hamon L, Daas L. et al. Tomographically normal partner eye in very asymmetrical corneal ectasia. Biomechanical analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021; 47: 366-372 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000435.
• 24 Zadnik K, Steger-May K, Fink BA. et al. Between-eye asymmetry in keratoconus. Cornea 2002; 21: 671-679 DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200210000-00008.
• 25 Gore DM, Shortt AJ, Allan BD. New clinical pathways for keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 2013; 27: 329-339 DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.257.
• 26 Ling JJ, Mian SI, Stein JD. et al. Impact of scleral contact lens use on the rate of corneal transplantation for keratoconus. Cornea 2021; 40: 39-42 DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002388.
• 27 Flockerzi E, Maier P, Böhringer D. et al. Trends in corneal transplantation from 2001 to 2016 in Germany. A report of the DOG-section cornea and its keratoplasty registry. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 188: 91-98 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.018.
• 28 Seitz B, Szentmáry N, Langenbucher A. et al. Perforierende Keratoplastik bei fortgeschrittenem Keratokonus – vom Hand-/Motortrepan hinauf zum Excimerlaser und zurück zum Femtosekundenlaser. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2016; 233: 727-736 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108654.
• 29 Gruenauer-Kloevekorn C, Kloevekorn-Fischer U, Duncker GIW. Contact lenses and special back surface design after penetrating keratoplasty to improve contact lens fit and visual outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1601-1608 DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.069500.
• 30 Brierly SC, Izquierdo L, Mannis MJ. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Cornea 2000; 19: 329-332 DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200005000-00014.