Z Orthop Unfall 2022; 160(05): 497-506
DOI: 10.1055/a-1394-6502
Original Article/Originalarbeit

Insufficiency Fractures vs. Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures – Epidemiological, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Characteristics of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Manuel Sterneder
1   Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Reconstructive and Septic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
Patricia Lang
1   Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Reconstructive and Septic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
Hans-Joachim Riesner
1   Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Reconstructive and Septic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
Carsten Hackenbroch
3   Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
Benedikt Friemert
1   Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Reconstructive and Septic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
2   Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Erlangen University Medical Centre, Erlangen, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) encompass two fracture entities: fracture after low-energy trauma and insufficiency fracture without trauma. It is unclear whether the two subgroups differ in terms of diagnosis and therapy. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate insufficiency fractures with regard to defined parameters and to compare specific parameters with the fractures after low-energy trauma.

Patients and Methods In the period from 2008 to 2017, 203 patients with FFP were recorded at our clinic (Level 1 Trauma Centre DGU, SAV approval). Of these, 25 had an insufficiency fracture and 178 had a pelvic ring fracture after low-energy trauma. Epidemiological, diagnostic and therapeutic parameters were examined.

Results There was a relative increase in the insufficiency fracture within the FFP (2008 – 2009: 5.0% vs. 2015 – 2017: 17.8%). In these patients, osteoporosis tended to be more pronounced than in patients after low-energy trauma (t-value: − 3.66 vs. − 3.13). The diagnosis of insufficiency fractures showed increased use of MRI and DECT (60.9% vs. 26.0%) and a high proportion of type IV fractures after FFP (40.0% vs. 7.9%). In terms of therapy, surgical treatment of the insufficiency fracture was sought more often (68,2% vs. 52,1%), with a tendency towards increased use of combined osteosynthesis procedures (14.3% vs. 7.6%).

Conclusion We were able to show that as the number of cases increases, the insufficiency fracture becomes more important within FFP. If these patients tend to have more pronounced osteoporosis, particular attention should be paid to the diagnosis and adequate therapy of the osteoporosis, especially in the case of an insufficiency fracture. In addition to the increased diagnostic testing using MRI and DECT to detect oedema and the increased surgical therapy for this type of fracture, it is also noteworthy that the insufficiency fracture can cause higher-grade fractures after FFP.



Publication History

Article published online:
19 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany