Correction of Torsional Deformity Following Nail Osteosynthesis of a Subtrochanteric Fracture

Abstract

Torsional deformity is a frequent complication following nail osteosynthesis of a subtrochanteric fracture. This complication is difficult to assess intraoperatively, but can cause major functional restrictions. The authors consider that a clinical assessment should be complemented by a postoperative radiological control standardised with torsion CT. Thus, torsion deformity can be recognised immediately and easily corrected if necessary. This can help to avoid long-term damage that requires considerable surgery. The video shows details of torsion correction after a ca. 5-week old subtrochanteric femoral fracture, which had been initially treated with a femur nail. Before torsion correction, the internal torsion on the right femur was 22° and the external torsion on the left femur was 2°. Thus, the total deformation of the external torsion on the left side was 24°. We note the indication for removal of the nail, torsion correction and reosteosynthesis with long PFNA. The postoperative CT control confirmed that the torsion correction was adequate with internal torsion of 25° on the operated left side.

Key words

deformity correction - posttraumatic deformity - lower limb

Publication History

Article published online:
17 December 2020

• References/Literatur

• 1 Vanhove F, Noppe N, Fragomen AT. et al. Standardization of torsional CT measurements of the lower limbs with threshold values for corrective osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139: 795-805
• 2 Stevens PM, Gaffney CJ, Fillerup H. Percutaneous rotational osteotomy of the femur utilizing an intramedullary rod. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2016; 11: 129-134
• 3 Karaman O, Ayhan E, Kesmezacar H. et al. Rotational malalignment after closed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures and its influence on daily life. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24: 1243-1247
• 4 Leonardi F, Rivera F, Zorzan A. et al. Bilateral double osteotomy in severe torsional malalignment syndrome: 16 years follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol 2014; 15: 131-136
• 5 Ahrend M, Ateschrang A, Stöckle U. et al. [Treatment strategy for posttraumatic complex deformity. After bilateral femoral shaft fractures]. Unfallchirurg 2016; 119: 151-158
• 6 Parikh S, Noyes FR. Patellofemoral disorders: role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in defining abnormal rotational lower limb alignment. Sports Health 2011; 3: 158-169
• 7 Hilgert RE, Ohrendorf K, Schäfer FKW. Bildwandlergestützte Vermeidung einer Torsionsabweichung zur Gegenseite bei der Oberschenkelmarknagelung. Unfallchirurg 2006; 109: 855-861
• 8 Vetter SY, Keil C, von Recum J. et al. Postoperative Torsionsdifferenz nach unaufgebohrter antegrader Marknagelosteosynthese des Femurs: eine retrospektive 5-Jahres-Analyse. Z Orthop Unfall 2014; 152: 498-503
• 9 Schröter S, Nakayama H, Ihle C. et al. Torsional Osteotomy. J Knee Surg 2020; 33: 486-495 doi:10.1055/s-0039-1678677
• 10 Sangeux M, Mahy J, Graham HK. Do physical examination and CT-scan measures of femoral neck anteversion and tibial torsion relate to each other?. Gait Posture 2014; 39: 12-16
• 11 Schroter S, Elson DW, Ateschrang A. et al. Lower Limb Deformity Analysis and the Planning of an Osteotomy. J Knee Surg 2017; 30: 393-408
• 12 Waidelich HA, Strecker W, Schneider E. [Computed tomographic torsion-angle and length measurement of the lower extremity. The methods, normal values and radiation load]. Rofo 1992; 157: 245-251
• 13 Strecker W, Hoellen I, Keppler P. et al. Torsionskorrekturen nach Marknagelosteosynthesen der unteren Extremität. Unfallchirurg 1997; 100: 29-38