Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2018; 127(06): 284-287
DOI: 10.1055/a-0624-5844
Fortbildung | Kieferorthopädie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Retention nach kieferorthopädischer Behandlung – eine Literaturübersicht

Birgit Lanzer
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 June 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Eine Form von Retention nach abgeschlossener kieferorthopädischer Behandlung ist empfehlenswert, um ein mögliches Rezidiv zu verhindern. Ein Rezidiv kann bspw. als Folge von gedehnten parodontalen Fasern auftreten, die dazu neigen, die Zähne in ihre ursprüngliche Position zurück zu bewegen, oder auch aufgrund ungünstiger okklusaler Kontakte nach Abschluss der Behandlung. Unerwünschte Zahnbewegungen ergeben sich aber auch durch den physiologischen Alterungsprozess, wobei es sich hierbei nicht um ein Rezidiv handelt, sondern um Veränderungen, die auch bei Patienten, die nie kieferorthopädisch behandelt wurden, auftreten.
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Knelrim RW. Invisible lower cuspid to cuspid retainer. Angle Orthodontist 1973; 43: 218-219
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Little RM, Riedel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years post-retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93: 423-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zachrisson BU. Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod 1977; 71: 440-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zachrisson BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. J Clin Orthod 1983; 17: 838-844
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Renkema AM, Sips ETH, Bronkhorst E. et al. A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in the Netherlands. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 432-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA. A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19: 501-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct bonded retainers: update and clinical advice. J Clin Orthod 2007; 41: 728-737
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Booth FA, Edelman JM, Proffit WR. Twenty-year follow up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 70-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod 1991; 25: 619-630
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rogers MB, Andrews LJ. Dependable technique for bonding a 3 x 3 retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 231-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Störmann I, Ehmer U. A prospective randomized study of different retainer types. J Orofac Orthop 2002; 63: 42-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Renkema AM, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E. et al. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 614-621
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Katsaros C, Livas C, Renkema AM. Unexpected complications of bonded mandibular lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 838-841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kucera J, Marek I. Unexpected complications associated with mandibular fixed retainers: a retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 149: 202-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pazera P, Fudaley P, Katsaros C. Severe complications of a bonded mandibular lingual retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 406-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Zachrisson BU. Third generation mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 retainer. J Clin Orthod 1995; 29: 39-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Eliades T. et al. In-vitro assessment of the forces generated by lingual fixed retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 44-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Forde K, Storey M, Littlewood SJ. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Eur J Orthod 2017; DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjx058.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Storey M, Forde K, Littlewood SJ. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 2: periodontal health outcomes after 12 months. Eur J Orthod 2017; DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjx059.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Johnston CD, Littlewood SJ. Retention in orthodontics. Br Dent J 2015; 218: 119-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Reitan K. Clinical and histological observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1967; 53: 721-745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Edwards JG. A study of the periodontium during orthodontic rotation of teeth. Am J Orthod 1968; 54: 441-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Little RM. Stability and relapse of dental arch alignment. Br J Orthod 1990; 17: 235-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Little RM, Wallen TR, Reidel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 349-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Parker WS. Retention-retainers may be forever. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 95: 505-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Durbin DD. Relapse and the need for permanent fixed retention. J Clin Orthod 2001; 35: 723-727
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cerny R. Permanent fixed lingual retention. J Clin Orthod 2001; 35: 728-732
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sinclair PM, Little ML. Maturation of untreated normal occlusions. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 114-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bishara SE, Treder JE. Changes in the dental arches and dentition between 25 and 45 years of age. Angle Orthod 1996; 66: 417-422
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Little RM. The Irregularity Index: A quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod 1975; 68: 554-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Peck H, Peck S. An index for assessing tooth shape deviations as applied to the mandibular incisors. Am J Orthod 1972; 61: 384-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar