Hamostaseologie 2015; 35(01): 77-83
DOI: 10.5482/HAMO-14-08-0036
Review
Schattauer GmbH

Anticoagulation in patients with impaired renal function and with haemodialysis

Anticoagulant effects, efficacy, safety, therapeutic optionsAntikoagulation bei Patienten mit eingeschränkter Nierenfunktion und HämodialyseAntikoagulante Effeke, Wirksamkeit, Sicherheit, therapeutische Optionen
J. Harenberg
1   Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
,
V. A.-T. Hentschel
2   5th Department of Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
,
S. Du
1   Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
,
S. Zolfaghari
1   Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
,
R. Krämer
3   Inorganic Chemistry Institute, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Germany
,
C. Weiss
4   Department of Biometry and Statistics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
,
B. K. Krämer
2   5th Department of Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
,
M. Wehling
1   Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
› Author Affiliations
The research was supported by a grant of the Dietmar Hopp foundation.
Further Information

Publication History

received: 27 August 2014

accepted in revised form: 10 November 2014

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Patients with impaired renal function are exposed to an increased risk for bleeding complications depending on the amount of the anticoagulant eliminated by the kidneys. The elimination of unfractionated heparins, vitamin K antagonists and argatroban is only minimally influenced by a reduced renal function. Low-molecular weight heparins, fondaparinux, danaparoid, hirudins and nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) cause a variably increased bleeding risk in renal impairment. Dose reductions are recommended for all of these anticoagulants in renal impairment, some are even contraindicated at certain levels of renal impairment. Their benefit over the conventional anticoagulants is preserved if renal dosing is employed. For end-stage renal disease patients specific treatment regimens are required.

Zusammenfassung

Patienten mit einer eingeschränkten Nierenfunktion sind einem erhöhten Blutungsrisiko durch Antikoagulanzien ausgesetzt, das von der Nierenausscheidung des Antikoagulanz abhängt. Die Elimination von unfraktioniertem Heparin, Vitamin-K-Antagonisten und Argatroban wird nur geringfügig von der Nierenfunktion beeinflusst. Niedermolekulare Heparine, Fondaparinux, Danaparoid, Hirudin und Nicht-Vitamin-K-Antagonist orale Antikoagulanzien (NOAK) sind mit einem erhöhten Blutungsrisiko bei abnehmender Nierenfunktion verbunden. Dosisreduktionen sind für alle diese Antikoagulanzien erforderlich in Abhängigkeit von der Nierenfunktion, einige sind bei schwerer Nierenfunktionstörung sogar kontraindiziert. Der Benefit gegenüber konventionellen Antikoagulanzien bleibt bei renaler Dosisanpassung bestehen. Für Hämodialysepatienten liegen spezifische Behandlungsregime vor.

 
  • References

  • 1 Holbrook A, Schulman S, Witt DM. et al. Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy. Chest 2012; 141 (Suppl. 02) e152S-e184S.
  • 2 Bauer KA. Pros and cons of new oral anticoagulants. American Society of Hematology Education Program 2013; 2013: 464-470.
  • 3 Ageno W, Gallus AS, Wittkowsky A. et al. Oral anticoagulant therapy. Chest 2012; 141 (Suppl. 02) e44S-e88S.
  • 4 Harenberg J, Wehling M. Current and future prospects for anticoagulant therapy. Semin Throm Hemost 2008; 34: 39-57.
  • 5 Guyatt GH, Eikelboom JW, Gould MK. et al. Approach to Outcome Measurement in the Prevention of Thrombosis in Surgical and Medical Patients. Chest 2012; 141 (Suppl. 02) e185S-e194S.
  • 6 Linkins LA, Dans AL, Moores LK. et al. Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Chest 2012; 141 (Suppl. 02) e495S-e530S.
  • 7 Van De Car DA, Rao SV, Ohman EM. Bivalirudin. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2010; 08: 1673-1681.
  • 8 Fischer KG. Hirudin in renal insufficiency. Semin Thromb Hemost 2002; 28: 467-482.
  • 9 Nagler M, Haslauer M, Wuillemin WA. Fondaparinux – data on efficacy and safety in special situations. Thromb Res 2012; 129: 407-417.
  • 10 Grand’Maison A, Charest AF, Geerts WH. Anticoagulant use in patients with chronic renal impairment. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2005; 05: 291-305.
  • 11 Bolignano D, Mattace-Raso F, Sijbrands EJ, Zoccali C. The aging kidney revisited. Ageing Res Rev 2014; 14: 65-80.
  • 12 Group KDIGOKCW. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2013; 03: 1-150.
  • 13 Bauersachs RM. Managing venous thromboembolism with novel oral anticoagulants in the elderly and other high-risk patient groups. Eur J Intern Med 2014; 25: 600-606.
  • 14 Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y. et al. A new risk scheme to predict warfarin-associated hemorrhage. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 395-401.
  • 15 Harenberg J, Bauersachs R, Diehm C. et al. Anticoagulation in the elderly. Internist 2010; 51: 1446-1455.
  • 16 Caranobe C, Barret A, Gabaig AM. et al. Disappearance of circulating anti-Xa activity after intravenous injection of standard heparin and of a low molecular weight heparin (CY 216) in normal and nephrectomized rabbits. Thromb Res 1985; 40: 129-133.
  • 17 Sanderink GJ, Guimart CG, Ozoux ML. et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the prophylactic dose of enoxaparin once daily over 4 days in patients with renal impairment. Thromb Res 2002; 105: 225-231.
  • 18 Hoffmann U, Harenberg J, Bauer K. et al. Bioequivalence of subcutaneous and intravenous bodyweight-independent high-dose low-molecular-weight heparin Certoparin on anti-Xa, Heptest, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor activity in volunteers. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2002; 13: 289-296.
  • 19 Dorsch O, Krieter DH, Lemke HD. et al. A multicenter, prospective, open-label, 8-week study of certoparin for anticoagulation during maintenance hemodialysis. BMC Nephrol 2012; 13: 50.
  • 20 Barras MA, Duffull SB, Atherton JJ, Green B. Individualized dosing of enoxaparin for subjects with renal impairment is superior to conventional dosing at achieving therapeutic concentrations. Ther Drug Monit 2010; 32: 482-488.
  • 21 Lim W, Dentali F, Eikelboom JW, Crowther MA. Meta-analysis: low-molecular-weight heparin and bleeding in patients with severe renal insufficiency. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 673-684.
  • 22 Hoffmann P, Keller F. Increased major bleeding risk in patients with kidney dysfunction receiving enoxaparin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2012; 68: 757-765.
  • 23 Siguret V, Gouin-Thibault I, Pautas E, Leizorovicz A. No accumulation of the peak anti-factor Xa activity of tinzaparin in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 09: 1966-1972.
  • 24 Leizorovicz A, Siguret V, Mottier D. et al. Safety profile of tinzaparin versus subcutaneous unfractionated heparin in elderly patients with impaired renal function treated for acute deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Res 2011; 128: 27-34.
  • 25 Clark NP. Low-molecular-weight heparin use in the obese, elderly, and in renal insufficiency. Thromb Res 2008; 123 (Suppl. 01) S58-61.
  • 26 DeCarolis DD, Thorson JG, Clairmont MA. et al. Enoxaparin outcomes in patients with moderate renal impairment. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 1713-1718.
  • 27 Harenberg J, Haaf B, Dempfle CE. et al. Monitoring of heparins in haemodialysis using an anti-factor-Xa-specific whole-blood clotting assay. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10: 217-222.
  • 28 Lim W, Cook DJ, Crowther MA. Safety and efficacy of low molecular weight heparins for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 3192-3206.
  • 29 Davenport A. Optimization of heparin anticoagulation for hemodialysis. Hemodial Int 2011; 15 (Suppl. 01) S43-S48.
  • 30 Nowak G. New anticoagulants for secondary haemostasis--anti IIa inhibitors. Hämostaseologie 2009; 29: 256-259.
  • 31 Wang LC, Huhle G, Malsch R. et al. Determination of heparin-induced IgG antibody in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II. Eur J Clin Invest 1999; 29: 232-237.
  • 32 Harenberg J, Jorg I, Fenyvesi T, Piazolo L. Treatment of patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and anti-lepirudin antibodies with argatroban. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2005; 19: 65-69.
  • 33 Harenberg J, Wehling M. Future of anticoagulant therapy. Cardiovasc Ther 2011; 29: 291-300.
  • 34 Agewall S, Cattaneo M, Collet JP. et al. Expert position paper on the use of proton pump inhibitors in patients with cardiovascular disease and antithrombotic therapy. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 1708-1713.
  • 35 Kubitza D, Becka M, Roth A, Mueck W. Dose-escalation study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in healthy elderly subjects. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24: 2757-2765.
  • 36 Poulsen BK, Grove EL, Husted SE. New oral anticoagulants: a review of the literature with particular emphasis on patients with impaired renal function. Drugs 2012; 72: 1739-1753.
  • 37 Kubitza D, Becka M, Mueck W. et al. Effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 70: 703-712.
  • 38 Fox KA, Piccini JP, Wojdyla D. et al. Prevention of stroke and systemic embolism with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and moderate renal impairment. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2387-2394.
  • 39 Hori M, Matsumoto M, Tanahashi N. et al. Safety and efficacy of adjusted dose of rivaroxaban in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Circ J 2013; 77: 632-638.
  • 40 Harenberg J, Kramer S, Du S. et al. Measurement of rivaroxaban and apixaban in serum samples of patients. Eur J Clin Invest 2014; 44: 743-752.
  • 41 Raghavan N, Frost CE, Yu Z. et al. Apixaban metabolism and pharmacokinetics after oral administration to humans. Drug Metab Dispos 2009; 37: 74-81.
  • 42 Hohnloser SH, Hijazi Z, Thomas L. et al. Efficacy of apixaban when compared with warfarin in relation to renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2821-2830.
  • 43 Samama MM, Mendell J, Guinet C. et al. In vitro study of the anticoagulant effects of edoxaban and its effect on thrombin generation in comparison to fondaparinux. Thromb Res 2012; 129: e77-e82.
  • 44 Zahir H, Matsushima N, Halim AB. et al. Edoxaban administration following enoxaparin. Thromb Haemost 2012; 108: 166-175.
  • 45 Mendell J, Zahir H, Matsushima N. et al. Drug-drug interaction studies of cardiovascular drugs involving p-glycoprotein, an efflux transporter, on the pharmacokinetics of edoxaban, an oral factor xa inhibitor. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2013; 13: 331-342.
  • 46 Hokusai VTEI, Buller HR, Decousus H. et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1406-1415.
  • 47 Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stahle H, Mazur D. Influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral dabigatran etexilate. Clin Pharmacokinet 2010; 49: 259-268.
  • 48 Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M. et al. EHRA practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2094-2106.