Registers for networked medical research in Germany

Keywords

Competence Networks - documentation - register protocol - registers

 

• References

• 1 Dreyer NA, Garner S. Registries for robust evidence. JAMA 2009; 302: 790-791.
• 2 Brooke EM. The current and future use of registers in health information systems. Geneva: World Health Organization,; 1974
• 3 Mathis S, Wild C. Register für klinische und gesundheitsökonomische Fragestellungen: Einsatzbereiche von kardiovaskulären, wirbelsäulenspezifischen und neurologischen Registern und Good Practice Strategien für die Arbeit mit Registern. HTA_Projektbericht #11, 2008. Wien: Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Health Technology Assessment,; 2008
• 4 Gladman DD, Menter A. Introduction/overview on clinical registries. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64 (II) ii101-ii102.
• 5 Bestehorn K. Medical Registries. Med Klin 2005; 100: 722-728 [in German].
• 6 Leiner F, Haux R. Systematic planning of clinical documentation. Methods of Information in Medicine 1996; 35: 25-34.
• 7 Wegscheider K. Medical registries. Benefits and limitations. Bundesgesundheitsbl - Gesundheitsforsch -Gesundheitsschutz 2004; 47: 416-421 [in German].
• 8 Gliklich R, Dreyer N. eds. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. AHRQ Publication No. 07-EHC001-1, April 2007.
• 9 Newton J, Garner S. Disease registers in England. A report commissioned by the Department of Health Policy Research Programme in support of the White Paper entitled Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation. Oxford: Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oxford; 2002
• 10 Pommerening K. et al. Integrating eHealth and medical research: The TMF data protection scheme. In: Blobel B, Pharow P, Zvarova J, Lopez D. (Eds.): eHealth: Combining Health Telematics, Telemedicine, Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics to the Edge. Aka, Berlin: 2008: 5-10.
• 11 Nonnemacher M, Weiland D, Neuhäuser M, Stausberg J. Adaptive management of data quality in cohort studies and registers: proposal for a guideline. Acta Informatica Medica 2007; 15: 225-230.
• 12 Drolet BC, Johnson KB. Categorizing the world of registries. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2008; 41: 1009-1020.
• 13 Winter A. et al. Integrated Information Systems for Translational Medicine. Meth Inf Med 2007; 46: 601-607.
• 14 Dugas M. et al. Single source information systems to connect patient care and clinical research. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009; 150: 61-65.
• 15 Ohmann C, Kuchinke W. Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration. Methods Inf Med. 2009; 48: 45-54.
• 16 Raftery J, Roderick P, Stevens A. Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment. Health Technology Assessment. 2005 9: (20)
• 17 Roovers JP. Registries: what level of evidence do they provide?. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007; 18: 1119-1120.
• 18 Arts DG, De Keizer NF, Scheffer GJ. Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9: 600-611.
• 19 Silver FL. et al. International experience in stroke registries: lessons learned in establishing the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31: S235-S237.
• 20 Evans SM, Bohensky M, Cameron PA, McNeil J. A survey of Australian clinical registries: can quality of care be measured?. Intern Med J. 2009 Oct 7. [Epub ahead of print].
• 21 ISO/IEC 20000. Information technology - Service management. 2005-12-15. Geneva: ISO,; 2005