J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28(08): 770-771
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.288ceu
JAAA CEU Program
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

JAAA CEU Program

Volume 28, Number 8 (September 2017)
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
26. Juni 2020 (online)

 

    Questions refer to Portnuff et al, “Safe Use of Acoustic Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Stimuli: Protocol and Patient-Specific Considerations,” 708–717.

    Learner Outcomes:

    Readers of this article should be able to:

    • Summarize the risk of hearing loss from high stimulus presentation levels used in testing vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs).

    • Discuss how stimulus parameters for recording VEMPs must be evaluated to minimize noise induced hearing loss.

    1. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) originating from the sternocleidomastoid muscle are:

      • cervical VEMPs (cVEMPs)

      • ocular VEMPs (oVEMPs)

      • triceps VEMPs (tVEMPs)

    2. Acoustic stimuli considered most effective in eliciting VEMPs are:

      • 250 Hz bone conduction clicks

      • 500 Hz air conduction tone bursts

      • short duration electrical clicks

    3. Mattingly et al (2015) observed sudden permanent sensorineural hearing loss after VEMP testing with stimuli of:

      • 95 – 100 dB nHL

      • 128 and 135 dB pSPL

      • 133 dB pSPL

    4. Price (1981) suggested that for ears at the 25th percentile of susceptibility, the critical level for instantaneous damage by impulsive noises was:

      • 132 dB pSPL

      • 136 dB pSPL

      • 140 dB pSPL

    5. Based on Beattie and Rochverger (2001), the difference between a “fast response” sound level meter reading of a 500 Hz tone burst, and the actual peak value is approximately:

      • 3 dB

      • 6 dB

      • 12 dB

    6. To assess risk for acoustic trauma from VEMP stimuli, the authors recommend establishing presentation levels in:

      • dB m

      • dB nHL or dB HL

      • dB pSPL or dB peSPL

    7. Reducing ear canal volume from 2.0 cc to 1.0 cc changes a stimulus level by a(n):

      • decrease of 6 dB

      • increase of 3 dB

      • increase of 6 dB

    8. The benefit of VEMP testing might not outweigh the risk for noise induced hearing loss for:

      • cochlear implant candidates

      • elderly patients (> 70 years of age)

      • patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD)

    9. When SSCD is suspected, VEMP testing:

      • can begin at lower starting presentation levels

      • requires a larger number of trials

      • should not be conducted

    10. In the authors' protocol for VEMP stimuli designed not to exceed NIOSH noise exposure values, fewer total sweeps are recommended for

      • cVEMPs

      • oVEMPs

      • tVEMPs


    #

    Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.