J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28(08): 770-771
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.288ceu
JAAA CEU Program
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

JAAA CEU Program

Volume 28, Number 8 (September 2017)
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 June 2020 (online)

Questions refer to Portnuff et al, “Safe Use of Acoustic Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Stimuli: Protocol and Patient-Specific Considerations,” 708–717.

Learner Outcomes:

Readers of this article should be able to:

  • Summarize the risk of hearing loss from high stimulus presentation levels used in testing vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs).

  • Discuss how stimulus parameters for recording VEMPs must be evaluated to minimize noise induced hearing loss.

  1. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) originating from the sternocleidomastoid muscle are:

    • cervical VEMPs (cVEMPs)

    • ocular VEMPs (oVEMPs)

    • triceps VEMPs (tVEMPs)

  2. Acoustic stimuli considered most effective in eliciting VEMPs are:

    • 250 Hz bone conduction clicks

    • 500 Hz air conduction tone bursts

    • short duration electrical clicks

  3. Mattingly et al (2015) observed sudden permanent sensorineural hearing loss after VEMP testing with stimuli of:

    • 95 – 100 dB nHL

    • 128 and 135 dB pSPL

    • 133 dB pSPL

  4. Price (1981) suggested that for ears at the 25th percentile of susceptibility, the critical level for instantaneous damage by impulsive noises was:

    • 132 dB pSPL

    • 136 dB pSPL

    • 140 dB pSPL

  5. Based on Beattie and Rochverger (2001), the difference between a “fast response” sound level meter reading of a 500 Hz tone burst, and the actual peak value is approximately:

    • 3 dB

    • 6 dB

    • 12 dB

  6. To assess risk for acoustic trauma from VEMP stimuli, the authors recommend establishing presentation levels in:

    • dB m

    • dB nHL or dB HL

    • dB pSPL or dB peSPL

  7. Reducing ear canal volume from 2.0 cc to 1.0 cc changes a stimulus level by a(n):

    • decrease of 6 dB

    • increase of 3 dB

    • increase of 6 dB

  8. The benefit of VEMP testing might not outweigh the risk for noise induced hearing loss for:

    • cochlear implant candidates

    • elderly patients (> 70 years of age)

    • patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD)

  9. When SSCD is suspected, VEMP testing:

    • can begin at lower starting presentation levels

    • requires a larger number of trials

    • should not be conducted

  10. In the authors' protocol for VEMP stimuli designed not to exceed NIOSH noise exposure values, fewer total sweeps are recommended for

    • cVEMPs

    • oVEMPs

    • tVEMPs