CDISC Standard-based Electronic Archiving of Clinical Trials

Summary

Objectives: Our objectives were to develop, based on the analysis of archived clinical trial documents and data and on the requirements of GCP-compliant electronic archiving, a concept for legally secure and technically feasible archiving of the entire clinical trial, including the essential documents of the trial master file and the study database.

Methods: Based on own experiences with CDISC, existing implementations and future developments, CDISC standards were evaluated concerning requirements for archiving clinical studies. Trial master files of a small, medium and large clinical study were analyzed to collect specifications for electronic archiving of records.

Results: Two different ways of long-term storage exist for the clinical trial archive: document-oriented archival and data archiving of the study database. The trial master file has a highly complex structure; its different parts can vary greatly in size, depending of the working style of investigators, number of patients recruited, the number of adverse event reports and the number of queries. The CDISC standard ODM is especially suited for archiving clinical trials, because among other features it contains the entire clinical trial data and full audit trail information. On the other hand SDTM is a content standard suited for data warehouses. Two recent developments in CDISC will affect the archival of studies: the further development of ODM in the area of “eCRF submission” and the use of “Electronic Source Data”.

Conclusions: The complexity and size of the trial master file requires new solutions. Though ODM provides effective means to archive the study database, it shows still deficiencies, especially for the joint archiving of data and the complex documentation of the trial master file. A concept was developed in which the ODM standard is part of an integrated archiving of the trial data and documents. ODM archiving of the study database enables long-term storage which is GCP-compliant. Archiving of documents of the trial master file in PDF/A, including links and electronic signatures, as well as the storage of selected study data in a data warehouse at the sponsor site in SDTM are the other components of the concept.

Keywords

Data management - clinical trials - CDISC - ODM - SDTM - archive - Good Clinical Practice - GCP - trial master file

• References

• 1 E 6 (R1) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95), 1995, Note for guidance on Good Clinical Practice.. EMEA, July 2002. Available from: www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/013595en.pdf.
• 2 Semler SC. Archivierungsaspekte aus Sicht der klinischen Forschung – Archivierung von Forschungsunterlagen. Hannöversche Archivtage, 21. Treffen der GMDS AG AKU Presentation: June 16, 2005; Hannover, Germany.
• 3 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) (homepage on the Internet).. CDISC Inc., 15907 Two Rivers Cove, Austin, Texas, USA; ^©2008 (cited Apr 20, 2009 ). Available from: www.cdisc.org.
• 4 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) (Internet]).. 15907 Two Rivers Cove, Austin, Texas, USA;^®2008.Standard available from:. http://www.cdisc.org/models/odm/v1.3/index.html (cited Apr 20, 2009 ).
• 5 Cassells S. The data archiving challenge. Presentation at: DIA Standards Conference; May 22, 2001. Washington, D. C., USA. Available from: http://www.cdisc.org/pdf/Archive0522ppt.pdf
• 6 Kubick W. Case study: applying CDISC standards to replace a legacy clinical data management system. CDISC European Interchange 2005, Bussy St George, Paris, France. Presentation: May 8, 2005
• 7 Kubick W. Using the CDISC Operational Data Model as an e-archiving solution, CDISC. Presentation: October 22, 2002
• 8 Telematikplattform für Medizinische Forschungsnetze e.. V. (Internet). Berlin, Germany; Apr 20, 2009 (cited Apr 20, 2009). Available from: http://www.tmf-ev.de
• 9 Kuchinke W, Wiegelmann S, Verplancke P, Ohmann C. Extended cooperation in clinical studies through exchange of CDISC metadata between different study software solutions. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (04) 441-446.
• 10 Olhede T, Peterson HE. Archiving of care related information in XML-format. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000; 77: 642-646.
• 11 Ohmann C, Kuchinke W. Future Developments of Medical Informatics from the Viewpoint of Networked Clinical Research. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (01) 45-54.
• 12 Prokosch H-U, Ganslandt T. Perspectives for Medical Informatics. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (01) 38-44.
• 13 Bain L. Retrieve form for data capture (RFD). EU Interchange, Montreux, Switzerland 2007. Presentation: Apr 27, 2007
• 14 Astheimer B. ODM archiving at a mouse click?. 3rd CDISC EU Interchange, Berlin, Germany. Presentation: May 3, 2006
• 15 SDTM: Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) (Internet).. 15907 Two Rivers Cove, Austin, Texas, USA; 2008. Stand available from: www.cdisc.org/models/sds/v3.1/index.html (cited Apr 20, 2009).
• 16 ArchiSig (Internet).. FH Mannheim, Germany; 2005 (updated Oct 18, 2005; cited Apr 20, 2009). Available from: www.archisig.de.
• 17 SAFE-BioPharma Association (Internet).. Fort Lee, NJ, USA; 2008; (cited Apr 20, 2009 ). Available from: www.safe-biopharma.org.
• 18 Hollerbach A, Brandner R, Bess A, Schmücker P, Bergh B. Electronically signed documents in health care – analysis and assessment of data formats and transformation. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (04) 520-527.
• 19 Hardison CD. The state of the CDISC union. CDISC International Interchange, Bethesda, USA. Presentation: Oct 2, 2007
• 20 CDISC Electronic Source Data Interchange (eSDI) Group.. Leveraging the CDISC standards to facilitate the use of Electronic Source Data within clinical trials. Version 1. CDISC, Austin, USA, Nov 20, 2006