Semi-automation of Doppler Spectrum Image Analysis for Grading Aortic Valve Stenosis Severity

Summary

Background: Doppler echocardiography analysis has become a golden standard in the modern diagnosis of heart diseases. In this paper, we propose a set of techniques for semi-automated parameter extraction for aortic valve stenosis severity grading. Objectives: The main objectives of the study is to create echocardiography image processing techniques, which minimize manual image processing work of clinicians and leads to reduced human error rates. Methods: Aortic valve and left ventricle output tract spectrogram images have been processed and analyzed. A novel method was developed to trace systoles and to extract diagnostic relevant features. The results of the introduced method have been compared to the findings of the participating cardiologists. Results: The experimental results showed the accuracy of the proposed method is comparable to the manual measurement performed by medical professionals. Linear regression analysis of the calculated parameters and the measurements manually obtained by the cardiologists resulted in the strongly correlated values: peak systolic velocity’s and mean pressure gradient’s R2 both equal to 0.99, their means’ differences equal to 0.02 m/s and 4.09 mmHg, respectively, and aortic valve area’s R2 of 0.89 with the two methods means’ difference of 0.19 mm. Conclusions: The introduced Doppler echocardiography images processing method can be used as a computer-aided assistance in the aortic valve stenosis diagnostics. In our future work, we intend to improve precision of left ventricular outflow tract spectrogram measurements and apply data mining methods to propose a clinical decision support system for diagnosing aortic valve stenosis.

Keywords

Digital image processing - feature extraction - aortic valve stenosis - Doppler echocardiography

• References

• 1 Hatle L, Angelsen B, Tromsdal A. Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. British heart journal 1980; 43 (Suppl. 03) 284-292.
• 2 Kurgan LA, Cios KJ, Tadeusiewicz R, Ogiela M, Goodenday LS. Knowledge discovery approach to automated cardiac SPECT diagnosis. Artificial intelligence in medicine 2001; 23 (Suppl. 02) 149-169.
• 3 Sacha JP, Cios KJ, Goodenday LS. Issues in automating cardiac SPECT diagnosis. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine. IEEE 2000; 19 (Suppl. 04) 78-88.
• 4 Shalbaf A, Behnam H, Alizade-Sani Z, Shojaifard M. Automatic classification of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities in echocardiography images using nonrigid image registration. Journal of digital imaging 2013; 26 (Suppl. 05) 909-919.
• 5 Sani ZA, Shalbaf A, Behnam H, Shalbaf R. Automatic Computation of Left Ventricular Volume Changes Over a Cardiac Cycle from Echocardiography Images by Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction. Journal of digital imaging. 2014 1–8
• 6 Neto Souza EP. et al. Assessment of cardiovascular autonomic control by the empirical mode decomposition. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (Suppl. 01) 60-65.
• 7 Lehmann TM, Guld MO, Deselaers T, Keysers D, Schubert H, Spitzer K. et al. Automatic categorization of medical images for content-based retrieval and data mining. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2005; 29 (Suppl. 02) 143-155.
• 8 Ren RLJBX. Aortic Stenosis. 2014
• 9 Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L, Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1985; 72 (Suppl. 04) 810-818.
• 10 Vahanian A, Otto CM. Risk stratification of patients with aortic stenosis. European heart journal 2010; 31 (Suppl. 04) 416-423.
• 11 Otto CM. The practice of clinical echocardiography. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012
• 12 RC Team. R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Austria: 2014
• 13 Abramoff MC, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics international 2004; 11 (Suppl. 07) 36-43.
• 14 Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW, Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E. et. al 671 nih image to imageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods. 2012 9 (7)
• 15 Ridler TW, Calvard S. Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1978; 8: 630-632.
• 16 Landin G. BinaryFill library. Internet resource: http://www.mecourse.com/landinig/software/software.html. [last accessed: 2015.05.20]
• 17 Soille P. Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications. Springer-Verlag; 1999. pp 173-174.
• 18 Dougherty G. Digital image processing for medical applications. Cambridge University Press; 2009
• 19 Ziou D, Tabbone S. et al. Edge detection techniques-an overview. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis C/C of Raspoznavaniye Obrazov I Analiz Izobrazhenii 1998; 8: 537-559.
• 20 Cleveland WS, Loader C. Smoothing by local regression: Principles and methods in Statistical theory and computational aspects of smoothing. Springer; 1996. pp 10-49.
• 21 Bland JM, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The lancet 1986; 327 8476 307-310.
• 22 Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 2007; 115 (Suppl. 22) 2856-2864.