Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2013; 52(03): 220-230
DOI: 10.3414/ME12-01-0027
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Introducing the Adherence Strategy Engineering Framework (ASEF)

Support for Developing Technology-based Self-care Solutions
S. Wagner
1   Department of Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
,
T. S. Toftegaard
1   Department of Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
,
O. W. Bertelsen
2   Department of Computer Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 04 April 2012

accepted: 16 April 2012

Publication Date:
20 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Background: Patients performing self-care in the unsupervised setting do not always adhere to the instructions they were initially provided with. As a consequence, a patient’s ability to successfully comply with the treatment plan cannot be verified by the treating healthcare professional, possibly resulting in reduced data quality and suboptimal treatment.

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to introduce the Adherence Strategy Engineering Framework (ASEF) as a method for developing novel technology-based adherence strategies to assess and improve patient adherence levels in the unsupervised setting.

Methods: Key concepts related to self-care and adherence were defined, discussed, and implemented as part of the ASEF framework.

ASEF was applied to seven self-care case studies, and the perceived usefulness and feasibility of ASEF was evaluated in a questionnaire study by the case study participants. Finally, we reviewed the individual case studies usage of ASEF.

Results: A range of central self-care concepts were defined and the ASEF methodological framework was introduced. ASEF was successfully used in seven case studies with a total of 25 participants. Of these, 16 provided answers in the questionnaire study reporting ASEF as useful and feasible. Case study reviews illustrated the potential of using context-aware technologies to support self-care in the unsupervised setting as well as ASEF’s ability to support this.

Conclusion: Challenges associated with moving healthcare to the unsupervised setting can be overcome by applying novel context-aware technology using the ASEF method. This could lead to better treatment outcomes and reduce healthcare expenditures.

Keywords

Patient adherence - medication adherence - self-care - telemedicine - eHealth
 

  • References

  • 1 Huniche L, Dinesen B, Grann O, Toft E, Nielsen C. Empowering patients with COPD using Tele-homecare technology. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 155: 48-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 de Oliveira R, Cherubini M, Oliver N. MoviPill: improving medication compliance for elders using a mobile persuasive social game. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2010.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Orwat C, Graefe A, Faulwasser T. Towards pervasive computing in health care - a literature review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8: 26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Clemensen J, Larsen SB, Ejskjaer N. Telemedical treatment at home of diabetic foot ulcers. J Telemed Telecare 2005; 11 Suppl 2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pickering TG. Ambulatory monitoring and blood pressure variability. Science Press. 1991.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Bott O, Marschollek M, Wolf K, Haux R. Towards new scopes: sensor-enhanced regional health information systems. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (04) 476-483.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Koch S, Marschollek M, Wolf KH, Plischke M, Haux R. On health-enabling and ambient-assistive technologies. What has been achieved and where do we have to go?. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (01) 29-37.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wagner S, Toftegaard TS, Bertelsen OW. Challenges in Blood Pressure Self-Measurement. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications. 2012.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Johnson KA, Partsch DJ, Rippole LL, McVey DM. Reliability of self-reported blood pressure measurements. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159 (22) 2689-2693.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mengden T, Hernandez Medina RM, Beltran B, Alvarez E, Kraft K, Vetter H. Reliability of reporting self-measured blood pressure values by hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11 (12) 1413-1417.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Myers MG. Self-measurement of blood pressure at home: The potential for reporting bias. Blood Press Monit 1998; 3 Suppl (Suppl. 01) S19-S22.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Santamore WP, Homko CJ, Kashem A, McConnell TR, Menapace FJ, Bove AA. Accuracy of blood pressure measurements transmitted through a telemedicine system in underserved populations. Telemed J E Health 2008; 14 (04) 333-338.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cramer JA, Benedict A, Muszbek N, Keskinaslan A, Khan ZM. The significance of compliance and persistence in the treatment of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: a review. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62 (01) 76-87.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 2005; 353 (05) 487-497.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Grönvall E, Aarhus R, Larsen SB. Vestibular rehabilitation in the home: design challenges. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Danish HCI Research Symposium; December. 2009.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Aarhus R, Grönvall E, Larsen SB. Interactive healthcare systems in the home: vestibular rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Systems in Healthcare; April. 2010: 10-11.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Campbell NR, Chockalingam A, Fodor JG, McKay DW. Accurate, reproducible measurement of blood pressure. CMAJ 1990; 143 (01) 19-24.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pierdomenico SD, Di Nicola M, Esposito AL, Di Mascio R, Ballone E, Lapenna D. et al Prognostic value of different indices of blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 2009; 22 (08) 842-847.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 National Library of Medicine. Self Care Scope Note. 2012 Available at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2011/MB_cgi?field=uidterm=D012648. Accessed 02/12, 2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Toobert DJ, Hampson S, Glasgow R. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000; 23 (07) 943
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McKellar JD, Humphreys K, Piette JD. Depression increases diabetes symptoms by complicating patients’ self-care adherence. Diabetes Educ 2004; 30: 485-492.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cafazzo J, Leonard K, Easty T, Rossos P, Chan C, Logan A. Complex Tele-Monitoring: Facilitating Patient Self-Care of the Chronically-Ill. In: Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Telehealth; July. 2005: 19-21.
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Merriam-Webster’s Medical Dictionary. 2011 Available at http://www.merriam-webster.com/. Accessed 09, 2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mosby’s Medical Dictionary. 8th ed. Elsevier; 2009.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 The American Heritage Medical Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin Company; 2007.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wahl C, Gregoire JP, Teo K, Beaulieu M, Labelle S, Leduc B. et al Concordance, compliance and adherence in healthcare: closing gaps and improving outcomes. Healthc Q 2005; 8 (01) 65-70.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 World Health Organization (WHO). Defining adherence. Adherence to long term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva: WHO Report; 2003: 3-4.
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Montague T, Cox J, Kramer S, Nemis-White J, Cochrane B, Wheatley M. et al Improving cardiovascular outcomes in Nova Scotia (ICONS): a successful public-private partnership in primary healthcare. Hosp Q 2003; 6 (03) 32-38.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Arlt S, Lindner R, Rosler A, von Renteln-Kruse W. Adherence to medication in patients with dementia: predictors and strategies for improvement. Drugs Aging 2008; 25 (12) 1033-1047.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bardram JE. Pervasive healthcare as a scientific discipline. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (03) 178-185.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Piette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer FB, McPhee SJ. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2001; 24 (02) 202-208.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Benyon D. Designing interactive systems: a comprehensive guide to HCI and interaction design. Addison Wesley. 2010.
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Joseph V, West RM, Shickle D, Keen J, Clamp S. Key challenges in the development and implementation of telehealth projects. J Telemed Telecare 2011; 17 (02) 71-77.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Pickering TG, White WB, Giles TD, Black HR, Izzo JL, Materson BJ. et al When and how to use self (home) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Am Soc Hypertens 2010; 4 (02) 56-61.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN. et al Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 2005; 111 (05) 697-716.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Frantz J, Feihl F, Waeber B. European Society of Hypertension. Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for home blood pressure measurement. Rev Med Suisse 2010; 6 (262) 1696-1699.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Intel Corporation. Intel Health Guide PHS6000 Available at. http://www.intel.com/corporate/ healthcare/emea/eng/healthguide/pdfs/Health_Guide_Product_Brief.pdf. Accessed Jan 1 2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tunstall Limited. Telehealth solutions. Available at. http://www.tunstall.co.uk/Our-products/Telehealth-solutions. Accessed Jan 1 2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Demiris G. Smart homes and ambient assisted living in an aging society. New opportunities and challenges for biomedical informatics. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (01) 56-57.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Dey AK. Ubiquitous Computing Fundamentals. In Krumm J. editor CRC Press; 2010.
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Varshney U. Pervasive Healthcare and Wireless Health Monitoring. Mobile Networks and Applications 2007; 12 (02) 113-127.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 MEMS - medication event monitoring system. Available at: www.aardexgroup.com. Accessed Nov 1, 2010.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Clemensen J, Larsen SB, Kyng M, Kirkevold M. Participatory design in health sciences: Using cooperative experimental methods in developing health services and computer technology. Qual Health Res 2007; 17 (01) 122-130.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Wagner S, Toftegaard TS, Bertelsen OW. Novel approach for ensuring increased validity in home blood pressure monitoring. 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth). 2010.
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Wagner S, Toftegaard TS, Bertelsen OW. Increased Data Quality in Home Blood Pressure Monitoring through Context Awareness. 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth). 2011.
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Wagner S, Toftegaard T, Bertelsen O. Context Assessment during Blood Pressure Self-measurement Utilizing the Sensor Chair. Ambient Intelligence. 2011: 295-299.
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Jacobson I, Booch G, Rumbaugh J. The unified software development process. Addison-Wesley. 1999.
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Kruchten P. The rational unified process: an introduction. Addison-Wesley Professional. 2004.
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Vitality - glowcaps. Available at. www.rxvitality.com. Accessed Nov 1, 2010
    PubMedGoogle Scholar