Methods Inf Med 2012; 51(02): 144-149
DOI: 10.3414/ME11-01-0049
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Mayak Workers Study Cohort[*]

An Inter-Institutional Comparison of Causes of Death in the Cause-of-Death Register of Ozyorsk in the Russian Federation
T. V. Azizova
1   Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorsk, Russia
,
V. Fedirko
2   International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
,
Y. Tsareva
1   Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorsk, Russia
,
F. Tretyakov
1   Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorsk, Russia
,
C. Funch Lassen
3   Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
S. Friis
3   Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
,
J. Schüz
2   International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received:08 June 2011

accepted:04 February 2011

Publication Date:
19 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Background: The cause-of-death register at the Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorsk, Russia, was established to document the number and causes of deaths in the Mayak workers cohort, which includes all persons (N = 22,377) employed at Mayak nuclear facility between 1948 and 1982. Most workers were occupationally exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation and have been shown to have increased risks of various chronic diseases including cancer.

Objectives: To investigate the quality of cause of death coding in the SUBI register.

Methods: A random sample of 246 deaths (~1% of the total) was coded independently at the SUBI and the Danish Cancer Society using the International Classification of Diseases 9 (ICD-9). Proportions of matching codes were calculated.

Results: Overall, 233 deaths (95%) were identically classified using the ICD-9 main category matching. Excluding mismatches that were considered to be incorrectly coded during validation, the validity of the register increased to 98%. Using the specific ICD-9 first three-digit matching, 182 deaths were identically coded (74%) and the respective validity of the register was 85%. There were also some non-resolvable discrepancies demonstrating limitations of assigning one code for each death or using language-adapted ICD-9 version.

Conclusions: This validation study was an important quality check of a register used for mortality follow-up in a highly influential epidemiological study on radiation-related health effects. The results of the inter-institutional comparison were generally favourable; however, since the comparison revealed individual mismatches and some systematically differing coding practices, it is essential to repeat it on a regular basis in order to maintain a high quality.

* Supplementary material published on our website www.methods-online.com


 
  • References

  • 1 Kruglov AK. Development of nuclear industry in the USSR. Moscow: CNII Atominform; 1995. p 380. In Russian.
  • 2 Nikipelov BV, Lyzlov AF, Koshurnikova NA. Experience of the first nuclear facility (exposure levels and workers’ health). Nature 1990; 1990; 30-38.
  • 3 Khokhryakov VV, Drozhko EG, Glagolenko YV. et al Studies on the Ozyorsk population: dosimetry. Radiat Environ Biophys 2002; 41: 33-35.
  • 4 Vasilenko EK, Khokhryakov VF, Miller SC. et al Mayak worker dosimetry study: an overview. Health Phys 2007; 93: 190-206.
  • 5 Azizova TV, Day RD, Wald N. et al The “clinic” medical-dosimetric database of Mayak production association workers: structure, characteristics and prospects of utilization. Health Phys 2008; 94: 449-458.
  • 6 Koshurnikova NA, Shilnikova NS, Okatenko PV. et al Characteristics of the cohort of workers at the Mayak nuclear complex. Radiat Res 1999; 152: 352-363.
  • 7 Sokolnikov ME, Gilbert ES, Preston DL. et al Lung, liver and bone cancer mortality in Mayak workers. Int J Cancer 2008; 123: 905-911.
  • 8 Shilnikova NS, Preston DL, Ron E. et al Cancer mortality risk among workers at the Mayak nuclear complex. Radiat Res 2003; 159: 787-798.
  • 9 Azizova TV, Muirhead CR, Druzhinina MB. et al Cerebrovascular diseases in the cohort of workers first employed at Mayak PA in 1948-1958. Radiat Res 2010; 174: 851-864.
  • 10 Azizova TV, Muirhead CR, Druzhinina MB. et al Cardiovascular diseases in the cohort of workers first employed at Mayak PA in 1948-1958. Radiat Res 2010; 174: 155-168.
  • 11 Anspaugh LR, Degteva MO, Vasilenko EK. Mayak Production Association: introduction. Radiat Environ Biophys 2002; 41: 19-22.
  • 12 Winkelmann RA, Tretyakov FD, Startsev NV. et al Cause-of-death registers in radiation-contaminated areas of the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan. Radiat Environ Biophys 2002; 41: 5-11.
  • 13 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174.
  • 14 US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. ICD conversion programs through 2011 diagnoses for ICD9-CM. http://www.seer.cancer.gov/tools/conversion/ March 10 2011
  • 15 Jouhet V, Defossez G, Burgun A, Le Beux P, Levillain P, Ingrand P, Claveau V. Automated Classification of Free-text Pathology Reports for Registration of Incident Cases of Cancer. Methods Inf Med. 2011 (epub ahead of print) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3414/ME11-01-0005.
  • 16 Guidelines for the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Trauma and Causes of Death. Revision of 1975. Geneva: WHO; 1980 In Russian.