Methods Inf Med 2008; 47(05): 435-442
DOI: 10.3414/ME0516
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Research Themes and Trends in Health Information Systems

W. Raghupathi
1   Fordham University, New York, USA
,
S. Nerur
2   University of Texas at Arlington, Texas, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 21 November 2007

accepted: 29 February 2008

Publication Date:
20 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Objectives: The health information systems (HIS) field is characterized as being associated with health care and information systems. Drawing on several disciplines, a body of knowledge has come together that help define the core internal structure of the field. This study attempts to identify the emerging sub-fields using the bibliometric technique of author-cocitation analysis.

Methods: Co-citation data for members of editorial boards of several health information systems journals for the period of 1998-2006 was collected and analyzed (N = 166). We performed numerous multivariate analyses, including cluster analysis, factor analysis and multidimensional scaling to extract the sub-fields.

Results: Our findings indicate the presence of several strong sub-fields, including HIS evaluation, communication and e-health, and clinical DSS. In addition, we identified other sub-fields that are distinct but still emerging, such as adoption, outcome and policy, and use and impact of HIS. The study also confirms the existence of several historical sub-fields and contrasts technology-oriented sub-fields with managementoriented sub-fields. Topics on the periphery of HIS provide links to other disciplines as well.

Conclusions: The study provides a unique perspective on the field of HIS, and the results indicate opportunities for further research that explores collaborations and social networks among the sub-fields.

 
  • References

  • 1 Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK. Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications; 1984
  • 2 Andrews J. An author co-citation of medical informatics. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2003; 91: 47-56.
  • 3 Bayer EA, Smart CJ, McLaughlin WG. Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1990; 41: 444-452.
  • 4 Borner K, Chen C, Boyack K. Visualizing knowledge domains. In: Cronin B. (ed). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 2003; 37: 179-255.
  • 5 Crane D. Invisible colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1972
  • 6 Eggers S, Huang Z, Chen H, Yan L, Larson C, Rashid A, Chau M, Lin C. Mapping medical informatics research. In: Chen H, Fuller S, Hersh WR, Friedman C. (eds). Medical Informatics:: Advances in Knowledge Management and Data Mining in Biomedicine. Springer-Verlag; 2005. pp 35-61.
  • 7 Gorsuch RL. Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey:: Erlbaum Associates; 1983
  • 8 Greenes RA, Siegel ER. Characterization of an emerging field: approaches to defining the literature and disciplinary boundaries of medical informatics. In: Stead WW. (ed). Eleventh Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington DC:: IEEE; 1987. pp 411-415.
  • 9 Haux R. Aims and tasks of medical informatics. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1997; 44: 9-20.
  • 10 Haux R. Health information systems – past, present, future. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006; 75: 268-281.
  • 11 Haux R, Hasman A, McCray AT, van der Lei J. Is medical informatics an art or a science?. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 651-655.
  • 12 Kruskal JB, Wish M. Multidisciplinary scaling. Beverly Hills, California:: Sage Publications; 1978
  • 13 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA, Lapao L, Wurst SHR. From health information systems to eHealth – editorial. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46: 450.
  • 14 Kuhn KA, Wurst SHR, Bott OJ, Giuse DA. Expanding the scope of health information systems. Challenges and developments.. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics; 2006. p 43.
  • 15 Malin B, Carley K. A longitudinal social network analysis of the editorial boards of medical informatics and bioinformatics journals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007; 14: 340-348.
  • 16 Mantas J. Health and medical informatics education. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46: 50-51.
  • 17 Maojo V, Kulikowski CA. Bioinformatics and medical informatics: collaborations on the road to genomic medicine?. Journal of theAmerican Medical Informatics Association 2003; 10: 515-522.
  • 18 Maojo V, Kulikowski CA. Medical informatics and bioinformatics: integration or evolution through scientific crises. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 474-482.
  • 19 McCain KW. Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1990; 41: 433-443.
  • 20 McCain KW. Core journal networks and cocitation maps: new bibliometric tools for serials research and management. Library Quarterly 1991; 61: 311-336.
  • 21 McCain KW. Biotechnology in context: a database- filtering approach to identifying core and productive non-core journals supporting multidisciplinary R&D. Journal of American Society for Information Science 1995; 46: 306-317.
  • 22 Morris TA, McCain KW. The structure of medical informatics journal literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1998; 5: 448-466.
  • 23 Musen MA. Medical informatics: searching for underlying components. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 12-19.
  • 24 Musen MA, van Bemmel JH. Challenges for medical informatics as an academic discipline – editorial. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 1-3.
  • 25 Raghupathi W, Nerur SP. Research themes and trends in artificial intelligence: an author co-citation analysis. Intelligence 1999; 10 (02) 18-23.
  • 26 Schiffman SS, Reynolds ML, Young FW. Introduction to multidimensional scaling: theory, methods, and applications. Orlando, Florida:: Academic Press; 1981
  • 27 Sittig DF. Identifying a core set of medical informatics serials: an analysis using the MEDLINE database. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 1996; 4: 200-204.
  • 28 Sittig DF, Kaalaas-Sittig J. A citation analysis of medical informatics journals. Medinfo 1995; 8: 1452-1456.
  • 29 Talmon JL, Hasman A. Medical informatics as a discipline at the beginning of the 21st century. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 4-7.
  • 30 Vishwanatham R. Citation analysis in journal rankings: medical informatics in the library and information science literature. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 1998; 86: 518-522.
  • 31 White HD. Author co-citation analysis overview and defense. In: Borgman CL. (ed). Scholarly communication. Newbury Park, California:: Sage Publications; 1990. pp 8-106.
  • 32 White HD, Griffith BC. Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1981; 32: 163-171.
  • 33 White HD, Griffith BC. Authors as markers of intellectual space: co-citation in studies of science, technology and society. Journal of Documentation 1982; 38: 255-272.
  • 34 White HD, McCain KW. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998; 49: 327-355.