Liverpool Aortic Surgery Symposium V

Abstract

Aortic aneurysm disease is a complex condition that requires a multidisciplinary approach in management. The innovation and collaboration among vascular surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, interventional radiology, and other related specialties is essential for progress in the management of aortic aneurysms. The Fifth Liverpool Aortic Surgery Symposium that was held in May 2013 aimed at bringing national and international experts from across the United Kingdom and the globe to deliver their thoughts, applications, and advances in aortic and vascular surgery. In this report, we present a selected short synopsis of the key topics presented at this symposium.

Key Words

Aortic Surgery - Conference - Aneurysm

Introduction

Aortic aneurysm disease is a complex condition that requires a multidisciplinary approach in management. The innovation and collaboration among vascular surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, interventional radiology, and other related specialties is essential for progress in the management of aortic aneurysms. The Fifth Liverpool Aortic Surgery Symposium that was held in May 2013 aimed at bringing national and international experts from across the United Kingdom and the globe to deliver their thoughts, applications, and advances in aortic and vascular surgery. The program was organized into eight sessions from experts in aortic surgery over the two day period; the key points and sessions are listed in [Table 1] and [Table 2]. There were discussions on a wide range of topics related to thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms, aortic dissections, genetics pertaining to the aorta, interventional radiology, endovascular therapy, intensive care, and anesthesiology and spinal cord protection. The symposium was an excellent opportunity to highlight the advances of aortic surgery and to discuss the future of aortic aneurysm management.

In this report, we present a selected short synopsis of the key topics which were raised throughout the two consecutive days of the symposium.

Thoracic Aortic Surgery

Aortic Root Session

Stentless versus Stented BioValsalva Graft

The increasing age of patients, recognition of anticoagulation-related complications, reduction in risk of repeated procedures of patients undergoing aortic root surgery, and the data that support the use of biological aortic valve in younger individuals have significantly increased the need for a composite biological valve conduit. Mr. Oo highlighted the concept of “patient tailored judgment” in selecting the appropriate biological valve conduit based on size of annulus, size of distal ascending aorta or arch or descending thoracic aorta, degree of calcification and deformity of aortic annulus, orientation of coronary ostia and buttons, degree of adhesions, and quality of periaortic root tissue. The BioValsalva valve conduit (Vascutek Terumo, Renfrewshire, Scotland, UK) is a presewn device combining an innovative trilaminate graft material with the Elan porcine stentless biological valve[1] [2]. This was subsequently followed by the introduction of the stented BioValsalva Biplex. This conduit comprises an Aspire porcine stented valve and Biplex Valsalva graft. Mr. Oo highlighted the technical details of both conduits and discussed their advantages and disadvantages. The ready-to-use Triplex Valsalva Graft combines the advantages of a biological valve conduit with the advantages of a better leaflet dynamic, and less tension on coronary ostia. However, Mr. Oo highlights cautions in using the BioValsalva graft, which include the use of BioValsalva in patients with bicuspid aortic valve where ectatic coronary ostia position is common, the lack of 29 mm size, and fixed and relatively narrow area of tube graft in between porcine aortic posts for coronary buttons. He emphasized the importance of knowledge of the size of valve and size of graft in each conduit. He pointed out that it is imperative to avoid deforming the sewing ring, or twisting of the graft, as these can lead to aortic regurgitation. He also stressed the fact that the Triplex conduit has flammable graft material; use of cautery on the graft is contraindicated.

Table 1. Fifth Liverpool Aortic Surgery Symposium: Key Points

Topic	Presenter	Key Point
Aortic Root Session	Mr. Aung Oo	Three biological valved conduits are available in Europe (but not in U.S.):
		Biovalsalva
		Biplex Valsalva
		Triplex Valsalva Graft
		Note: Cautery is contraindicated for the flammable Triplex Valsalva Graft.
Aortic Dissection Section	Mr. Manoj Kuduvalli	Reoperation is necessary in many patients after life-saving operations for acute Type A aortic dissection:
		For 30% of patients proximally
		For 20% of patients distally
		Mortality for reoperations ranges from 3 to 18%.
Aortic Arch Section	(Multiple)	Technical approaches and current options reviewed fully.
		The optimal technique for cerebral protection remains to this day uncertain.
	Dr. Roberto DiBartolomeo	Elephant trunk procedure facilitates proximal anastomosis of second-stage procedure.
	Dr. Malakh Shrestha	Second-stage procedure carries cumulative mortality risk of stage 1 and stage 2, as well as risk of spinal cord injury.
		Frozen elephant trunk procedure was developed to mitigate these risks.
Spinal Cord Protection	Dr. Randall Griepp	Extensive research disputes the concept of a critical artery of Adamkiewicz, in favor of a rich potential collateral network of small vessels.
Neuromonitoring	Dr. Mike Desmond	MEP monitoring can be extended for several days in ICU, permitting early recognition of late-onset paraplegia.
Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms	Mr. Aung Oo	When the aorta can be clamped proximally for the upper anastomosis, LA-FA bypass is used.
		When proximal clamping is not possible, the procedure is done under DHCA.

MEP + motor evoked potential; LA-FA + left arterial to femoral artery; DHCA + Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Table 2. Session title and moderators

Session	Title	Speaker	Affiliation
Opening Remarks	–	Mr. Abbas Rahid/Mr. Oo	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
Aorta in General	Genetic Basis of Management of Aortic Pathologies	Dr. Ian Ellis	Alder Hey Childrens Hospital, UK
Moderators: Mr. Abbas Rashid/Ms. Janice Harper/Mr. Graham Cooper	Biomarkers in Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Pathologies	Prof. John Pepper	Imperial College, UK
	Diagnosis and Management of Large Vessel Vasculitis	Dr. Devesh Mewar	Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK
	Update on Imaging Techniques and their Role in Clinical Practice in Aortic Surgery	Dr. Caroline McCann	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
Aortic Root Surgery	Aortic Root Replacement—Safeguards and Pitfalls	Mr. James Kuo	Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
Moderators: Mr. Alan Bryan/Mr. Rao Vallabhaneni	Techniques and Outcomes of Redo-Aortic Root Surgery	Mr. Graham Cooper	Sheffield Teaching Hospital, UK
	Stentless and Stented Biovalsalva—Liverpool experience	Mr. Oo	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
Professor Robert Bonser Memorial Lecture	Past, Present and Future of Spinal Cord Protection in Aortic Surgery and Intervention	Prof. Randall Griepp	Mount Sinai School of Medicine, USA
Moderators: Dr. Hazim Safi
Aortic Dissection	Surgery for Acute Type A Dissection—How I do it	Mr. Alan Bryan	University Hospital Bristol, UK
Moderators: Mr. Graham Cooper/Mr. Francesso Torella	Reinterventions following Type A Dissection Repair	Mr. Manoj Kuduvalli	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
	Management of IMH and PAU	Mr. John Brennan	Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK
	Updates on Midterm Outcomes of Endovasclar Repair of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection	Dr. Christoph Nienaber	University Hospital Rostock, Germany
	Surgery for Type B Aortic Dissection	Dr. Anthony Estrera	Memorial Hermann Hospital, USA
Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science (ICMS) Sponsored Debate	Measuring Outcomes of Aortic Surgery and Interventions: Key Quality Indicators for Management of Aortic Disease	Mr. Mark Field	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
Moderators: Dr. Randall Griepp, Dr. Joseph Coselli, Dr. Hazim Safi, Dr. Anthony Estrera, Prof. John Pepper, Mr. Charles McCollum, Mr. Julian Scott, Mr. John Brennan
Aortic Arch Moderators: Mr. Abbas Rashid/Mr. Richard McWilliams	Aortic Arch Surgery—Techniques and Outcomes	Prof. Joseph Coselli	Texas Heart Institute, USA
	Haemostatsis in Aortic Surgery	Dr. Seema Agarwal	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
	Surgical Management of Aortic Arch and Proximal Descending Thoracic Aortic Pathologies Utilising EVITA open Plus System	Dr. Roberto Di Bartolomeo	Almamater University of Bologna, Italy
	Repair of Aortic Arch and Proximal Descending Aortic Aneurysm Utilising Vascutek Hybrid Stent Graft	Dr. Malakh Shrestha	Hannover Medical School, Germany
	How Warm Can You Go in Arch Surgery	Prof. Ferdinand Waldenberger	Heart Center Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
Anaesthetic Practice in Aortic Surgery	Preoperative Assessment and Optimization in Aortic Surgery	Dr. Keith Mills	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
Moderators: Dr. Johnathon Kendall/Dr. Roy Sheinbaum	Setting up a Neuromonitoring Service for Aortic Surgery—Liverpool Experience	Dr. Mike Desmond	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
	Anaesthetic Management in Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery	Dr. Roy Sheinbaum	University of Texas Medical School, USA
	Postoperative Critical Care Management following Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair	Dr. Nigel Scawn	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
	Circulatory Management and Organ Protection in TAA Surgery	Mr. Manoj Kuduvalli	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
Thoracoabdominal Aorta	Open Surgical Repair of Extended Type IV Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms—Scottish Experience	Dr. Rod Chalmers	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
Moderators: Dr. Joseph Coselli/Mr. Peter Harris	Open Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms—Liverpool Experience	Mr. Aung Oo	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK
	Multi-layer Flow Modulating Stents (MFMS) in Thoracic and Perirenal Aortic Aneurysm	Prof. Charles McCollum	University of Manchester, UK
	Branched and Fenestrated Endovascular Repair—Early and Long-term Outcomes	Mr. Rao Vallabhaneni	Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK
	Surgery of Extent II Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms	Prof. Hazim Safi	University of Texas Medical School, USA
Closing Remarks		Mr. Abbas Rashid/Mr. Aung Oo	Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, UK

IMH + intramural hematoma; PAU + penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer; TAA + thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Aortic Dissection Session

Reintervention on Aortic Root and Following Type A Aortic Dissection

Reoperative surgery on the aortic root and ascending aorta continues to challenge cardiac surgeons. The mortality rate associated with these complex reconstructions is at least 3 times higher than it is for the initial surgery[3]. Complications after such procedures also occur with disappointingly high frequency, leading to substantial morbidity and delayed recovery[3]. At the symposium, redo aortic root replacement and reintervention following Type A dissection repair were discussed. The indications and outcomes for reoperative surgery on the aortic root vary considerably in the literature. [Table 3] summarizes the indications in the literature for redo aortic root replacement based on series of heterogeneous case reviews[4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]. The operative mortality ranges from 3% to 18% with 10 year survival around 60% and freedom from reoperation around 90%[7] [9] [11]. Repair of acute Type A dissection (ATAD) is usually done in the urgent or emergency setting. The aim of the operation is mainly to address the pathology, which is of immediate threat to the life of the patient. This usually leaves residual dissected aorta behind, on many occasions proximally to the repaired aortic root and on many occasions distally at the arch and the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta. The residual aorta requires active monitoring with serial imaging modalities, as the need for reintervention on the proximal aorta averages approximately 30% and in the distal aorta approximately 20%, though there is a fairly wide variation of this incidence in the published literature[12] [13]. Mr. Kuduvalli presented the Liverpool data for ATAD. Since 1998, 147 patients have been admitted to the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital with Type A dissection. Since 2007, after reorganization of the aortic specialty service, the overall mortality was reduced from 21.0% to 10.4%. Of the 116 survivors at the unit, 12.1% of patients had a reintervention. Type of reintervention is displayed in [Table 4]. The overall in-hospital mortality at Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital of patients undergoing reintervention following acute Type A dissection is 14.2%. Of this group, those who had reintervention on the reconstructed aortic root and suspended valve had an in-hospital mortality of 7.6%.

Table 3. Indications in the Literature for Reoperative Aortic Root Replacement Based on Series of Heterogeneous Case Reviews[4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Indications	Frequency From	To
Infection	4%	50%
Valve dysfunction	18%	55%
False aneurysm	2%	50%
True aneurysm	25%	83%
Acute dissection	3%	8%

Table 4. Reintervention at Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Following Acute Type A Dissection

Reintervention	% of Patients
Bentall	14.2%
Bentall + total arch replacement	14.2%
Arch replacements	28.5%
Repair of pseudoaneurysm from LCA button	14.2%
DTA	7.1%
Extent I TAAA	7.1%
Extent II TAAA	7.1%
Distal abdominal aorta	7.1%

LCA + left coronary artery; DTA + descending thoracic aneurysm; TAAA + thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.

Aortic Arch Session

Dr. Coselli summarized the techniques and outcomes in aortic arch surgery during his presentation at the symposium. He indicated that attempts to repair or replace fusiform aneurysms for the aortic arch began in 1951. Barriers to success included left ventricular strain and atrial fibrillation, plus the risk of catastrophic cerebral ischemia. None of the early attempts were successful until 1957, when De Bakey and colleagues[14], using an early form of antegrade cerebral perfusion, repaired the aortic arch of a 56-year-old patient by replacing it with a homograft. In the 1960s and 1970s, repair progressed with the introduction of the island patch reattachment strategy for the brachiocephalic arteries, the use of profound hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA; 14°C), and open distal anastomosis techniques[15]. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, cerebral perfusion strategies were improved to better protect patients from stroke by antegrade and retrograde cerebral perfusion techniques. Cerebral perfusion techniques were explored, flexible cerebral perfusion catheters were developed, and a cold cerebroplegia technique was introduced[16]. In this era, elephant trunk approaches to extensive aortic repair were introduced by Borst et al.[17] as part of a staged repair. The advances of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) have even reduced a two-staged repair to one in selected patients. Spielvogel[18] radically changed aortic arch repair by developing the Y graft approaches, which essentially debranched the brachiocephalic vessels and moved the distal anastomosis forward. With the addition of a collared elephant trunk graft, this technique has been adopted by several centers with good results, even in patients with acute dissection. Most centers use antegrade cerebral perfusion rather than retrograde, and many centers are exploring the use of more moderate temperatures for HCA. Despite this fact, Dr. Waldenberger commented that the incidence of neurological complications is still considerably high. The brain and spinal cord are both vulnerable to ischemia and hypoxia, the approaches to mitigate the effects of hypoperfusion are numerous, and the knowledge concerning the entire problem is still limited. Accordingly, the optimal temperature for HCA during arch surgery remains unclear. However, temperature management is only one variable in a complex strategy including a myriad of other clinical variables, such as location of temperature measurement, cannulation site, perfusion techniques, and use of intraoperative neuromonitoring. In view of these limitations of circulatory arrest, he reflected the logical evidence, which is to evaluate a normothermic approach to aortic arch surgery. This has become gradually the standard practice in many centers on the basis of superior results obtained due to maintaining patient physiological state during aortic arch surgery[19]. “How warm can we go in aortic arch surgery?” remains an elusive question that is still unanswered in the present era.

Advances in the elephant trunk procedure. The development of the elephant trunk procedure for aneurysm of the ascending, arch, and descending thoracic aorta has improved the repair of complex aortic lesions by facilitating the proximal anastomosis at the time of the second-stage descending aneurysm repair[20]. The second intervention carries the cumulative risk of two major procedures, an additional risk for mortality up to 5%[8], and a spinal cord injury risk of 3% to 10%[21]. This led to the evolution of the FET that summed the aortic repair in one single stage. The Vascutek Hybrid Device (Vascutek Terumo) is designed to further simplify the one-stage FET procedure by providing a one-piece device, thereby removing the need to join the conventional prosthesis and endovascular stent graft[22]. The Vascutek Thoraflex Hybrid Device is a woven polyester prosthesis, with the addition of nitinol ring stents. Branches are provided to accommodate reconstruction of the major aortic branch vessels and intraoperative attachment of a perfusion cannula during cardiopulmonary bypass where antegrade perfusion techniques are employed. In a recent study done by the Hannover group[23], looking at their ten years' experience with the use of FET, they concluded that the FET concept adds to the armamentarium of the surgeon in the treatment of complex and diverse aortic arch pathologies. The preoperative patient risk profile explains the still considerable postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality. The FET can still potentially be a “one-stage” procedure in selected patients. However, the extension of FET to patients with extensive aortic aneurysms has led to an increase in the need for additional procedures.

Past, Present, and Future of Spinal Cord Protection in Aortic Surgery and Intervention

Dr. Griepp presented the history of spinal cord protection in aortic surgery; he further shared some experimental data his team is working on during the Robert Bonser Memorial Lecture at the symposium.

He presented a short synopsis on how, traditionally, the spinal cord was thought to be perfused by a single artery, mainly arising from the descending aorta, namely the artery of Adamkiewicz. Dr. Griepp's teams have challenged this view by proposing the existence of an extensive collateral network. This collateral network includes all the segmental arteries, both intercostal and lumbar, which send branches to the anterior spinal artery[23]. Griepp and colleagues also propose that the anterior spinal artery is fed by an extensive epidural arterial network, and by a dense array of small vessels which supply the paraspinal musculature. The extensive collateral network allows compensatory flow to the spinal cord when some of the direct inputs to the anterior spinal artery are compromised. Retrospective analysis of extensive thoraco-abdominal repairs has revealed that patients undergoing a two-staged repair compared to those who undergo a single-staged repair had a much lower risk of developing spinal cord injury[24]. It is from this observation that it was it was proposed that physiological adaptations of the collateral network in response to loss of the segmental arteries allowed for better spinal cord perfusion.

This collateral network was visibly demonstrated through a series of anatomical studies of the collateral network wherein casts of methyl methacrylate of the circulatory system of juvenile pigs were made[25]. This showed a vast network of interconnected small arteries and arterioles surrounding the spinal cord: a matrix of vessels connecting the relatively modest spinal cord perfusion circuit with the much more extensive network of vessels supplying the paraspinal muscles. Furthermore, these casts showed that sacrifice of the segmental arteries causes enlargement of the anterior spinal artery after 24 hours, with further expansion of various components of the intraspinal circulation by 5 days. Analysis also reveals that there is a gradual reorientation of proliferating vessels after extensive segmental artery sacrifice to be more parallel to the spinal axis[25].

Further research into the anatomy and physiology of the spinal cord circulation can be helpful in directing the time course of staged interventions and the duration and nature of measures to improve spinal cord protection.

Quality and Outcome

Quality outcomes for aortic intervention. Quality is dependent on perspective and will be defined differently by patient, provider (hospital versus caregivers), payers/commissioners, and society. We discussed desired outcomes, which center on provision of a triad of prognostic benefit, symptomatic relief, and improved quality of life based on patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), delivered in a subspecialized, multidisciplinary, high volume, safe, and cost-effective manner. These factors are considered within the structure of outcome, process, and structure (Donabedian model). At the symposium, Mr. Field presented a number of dimensions including acute and elective services and preoperative, operative, and postoperative processes. Anatomical breakdown such as root surgery, arch surgery, and thoracoabdominal surgery was discussed, as well as endovascular intervention.

Other issues for discussion and inclusion in generic “quality accounts” include: hospital versus team versus individual outcomes, volume, training, technical support, reintervention rate, perfusion, length of stay audit, benchmarking, education, genetic counseling, and imaging follow-up.

Anesthesia and Perfusion

Setting up a neuromonitoring service for aortic surgery—Liverpool experience. Little if any information exists on the practical issues of setting up such a service, managing patients safely using this technology, and informing potential users of pitfalls and safeguards. The Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Service at Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital has been developing a program for intervention on the descending thoracic aorta over the last decade. As part of the introduction of a number of measures to prevent intraoperative paraplegia, we introduced transcranial motor evoked potential (tcMEP) monitoring. Our previous observations had suggested that in a significant proportion of patients, transient paraplegia was not acquired intraoperatively but was delayed (days 1-3) and was often related to deviation from agreed upon postoperative instructions for management of spinal cord perfusion pressure. We therefore extended our use of tcMEP monitoring to the postoperative period on intensive care. This formed processes and protocols for setting up and managing perioperative tcMEP monitoring, in the form of a pathway.

Thoracoabdominal Aortic Surgery

Open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms—Liverpool experience. Open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) is not widely performed in the United Kingdom. In Liverpool, the thoracic aortic aneurysm service was developed over the last 17 years. The first open repairs of TAAA took place in 1996. This procedure has evolved over the last decade with introduction of a multidisciplinary team approach and an integrated organ protection strategy. From January 1996 to February 2012, 178 descending thoracic aneurysms (DTAs) and TAAAs were treated in Liverpool. A total of 130 patients underwent open repair of TAAA. Mean age was 66 years and 33.9% were female. Spinal drainage was performed for all patients. Over the last year, MEPs were introduced as routine for intra- and postoperative monitoring. Patients who were suitable for proximal clamping of DTA procedures were operated with distal perfusion via left heart bypass. Those unsuitable for proximal clamping were operated under hypothermic circulatory arrest. Our 30 day mortality in the elective group was 8.3% and for nonelective was 26.3%. Permanent stroke incidence was 6.1%. Paraplegia occurred in 2.8% of the elective surgery group. A total of 23.7% developed respiratory complications and 25% developed renal failure. The five-year survival of the elective patients is 70% ([Table 5], [Fig. 1A] and [1B]).

Table 5. Liverpool Experience of TAAA Surgical Repair

Surgery	Number of Patients
DTA and TAAA (Extent I–V)	178
Open surgery	163
DTA	33
TAAA I–V	130
TAAA I	28
TAAA II	91
TAAA III	6
TAAA IV	5

DTA + descending thoracic aneurysm; TAAA + thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.

Figure 1. (A) TAAA + descending aortic surgery mid-term survival (note truncated axis). (B) TAAA + descending aortic surgery mid-term survival, stratified by operative priority (note truncated axis).

Summary

The Fifth Liverpool Aortic Surgery Symposium was very well accepted from the international audience in attendance. The subtitle of the symposium, “new frontiers,” was extremely apt considering the topics of discussion and the presentations given over the course of the two days. The Liverpool Aortic team looks forward to hosting the next Liverpool Aortic Symposium in 2015 and hopes to see you there. More information will be available from http://www.aorticaneurysm.org.uk/ closer to the date of the symposium.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest relevant to this publication.

• References

• 1 De Paulis R, De Matteis GM, Nardi P, Scaffa R, Colella DF, Chiarello L. A new aortic Dacron conduit for surgical treatment of aortic root pathology. Ital Heart J 2000; 1: 457-463
• 2 De Paulis R, Scaffa R, Maselli D, Weltert L, Salica A, Bellisario A. Valsalva graft in the Bentall procedure: from mechanical valve to the BioValsalva, world's first biological aortic conduit. Surg Technol Int 2008; 17: 216-221
• 3 Girardi LN, Coselli JS. Reoperative repair of the aortic root and ascending aorta. Tex Heart Inst J 2011; 38: 680-683
• 4 David TE, Feindel CM, Ivanov J, Armstrong S. Aortic root replacement in patients with previous heart surgery. J Card Surg 2004; 19: 325-328 . 10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.4058_11.x
• 5 Dougenis D, Daily BB, Kouchoukos NT. Reoperations on the aortic root and ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 986-992 . 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00626-7
• 6 Kirsch EW, Radu NC, Mekontso-Dessap A, Hillion ML, Loisance D. Aortic root replacement after previous surgical intervention on the aortic valve, aortic root, or ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 601-608 . 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.11.007
• 7 LeMaire SA, DiBardino DJ, Köksoy C, Coselli JS. Proximal aortic reoperations in patients with composite valve grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 5: S1777-S1782 ; discussion S-1792–S1799. 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04152-8
• 8 Malvindi PG, van Putte BP, Heijmen RH, Schepens MA, Morshuis WJ. Reoperations on the aortic root: experience in 46 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 81-86 . 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.014
• 9 Schepens MA, Dossche KM, Morshuis WJ. Reoperations on the ascending aorta and aortic root: pitfalls and results in 134 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1676-1680 . 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00760-2
• 10 Szeto WY, Bavaria JE, Bowen FW, Geirsson A, Cornelius K, Hargrove WC. , et al. Reoperative aortic root replacement in patients with previous aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 1592-1598 ; discussion 1598-1599. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.049
• 11 Malvindi PG, van Putte BP, Heijmen RH, Schepens MA, Morshuis WJ. Reoperations on the aortic root: experience in 46 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 81-86 . 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.014
• 12 Faure EM, Canaud L, Agostini C, Shaub R, Böge G, Marty-Ané C. , et al. Reintervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of complicated aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59: 327-333 . 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.089
• 13 Tan ME, Morshuis WJ, Dossche KM, Kelder JC, Waanders FG, Schepens MA. Long-term results after 27 years of surgical treatment of acute type a aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 523-529 . 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.02.059
• 14 De Bakey ME, Crawford ES, Cooley DA, Morris Jr GC. Successful resection of fusiform aneurysm of aortic arch with replacement by homograft. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1957; 105: 657-664
• 15 Bloodwell RD, Hallman GL, Cooley DA. Total replacement of the aortic arch and the “subclavian steal” phenomenon. Ann Thorac Surg 1968; 5: 236-245 . 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)66338-2
• 16 Coselli JS, LeMaire SA. Aortic arch surgery: principles, strategies, and outcomes. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008
• 17 Borst HG, Walterbusch G, Schaps D. Extensive aortic replacement using “elephant trunk” prosthesis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 31: 37-40 . 10.1055/s-2007-1020290
• 18 Spielvogel D, Etz CD, Silovitz D, Lansman SL, Griepp RB. Aortic arch replacement with a trifurcated graft. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: S791-S795 ; discussion S824–S831. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.015
• 19 Murphy GS, Hessel 2nd EA, Groom RC. Optimal perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: an evidence-based approach. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 1394-1417 . 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181875e2e
• 20 Heinemann MK, Buehner B, Jurmann MJ, Borst H-G. Use of the “elephant trunk technique” in aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 2-6 ; discussion 7. 10.1016/S0003-4975(95)00319-3
• 21 Williams GM, Perler BA, Burdick JF, Osterman Jr FA, Mitchell S, Merine D. , et al. Angiographic localization of spinal cord blood supply and its relationship to postoperative paraplegia. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13: 23-33 ; discussion 33-35. 10.1016/0741-5214(91)90009-J.
• 22 Shrestha M, Pichlmaier M, Martens A, Hagl C, Khaladj N, Haverich A. Total aortic arch replacement with a novel four-branched frozen elephant trunk graft: first-in-man results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43: 406-410 . 10.1093/ejcts/ezs296
• 23 Griepp EB, Di Luozzo G, Schray D, Stefanovic A, Geisbüsch S, Griepp RB. The anatomy of the spinal cord collateral circulation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 1: 350-357 . 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.09.03
• 24 Etz CD, Zoli S, Mueller CS, Bodian CA, Di Luozzo G, Lazala R. , et al. Staged repair significantly reduces paraplegia rate after extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139: 1464-1472 . 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.02.037
• 25 Etz CD, Kari FA, Mueller CS, Silovitz D, Brenner RM, Lin HM. , et al. The collateral network concept: a reassessment of the anatomy of spinal cord perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 2011; 141: 1020-1028 . 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.06.023