Download PDF
Phlebologie 2017; 46(01): 21-29
DOI: 10.12687/phleb2351-1-2017
Ratschow-Medaille 2016
Schattauer GmbH

Large vein reconstructions in the endovascular era[1]

Rekonstruktion der großen Venen in der endovaskulären Ära
P. Gloviczki
Roberts Professor and Chair, Emeritus, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Director, Emeritus, Gonda Vascular Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 11 January 2017

Accepted: 11 January 2017

Publication Date:
05 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Max Ratschow was a remarkable physician and an international authority in the field of angiology and the Ratschow lectureship helps to fulfill this pioneer’s life purpose: to advance evaluation and treatment of vascular diseases. The 2017 Max Ratschow lecture covers some recent advances and controversies in venous diseases. Phlebology, once a neglected field of angiology, is a discipline that has been in constant progress during the past decades. Endovascular techniques revolutionized treatment of patients with large vein obstruction and provided safe, minimally invasive procedures with excellent long term results. Attention now need to focus on comparative studies to provide scientific evidence of efficacy of venous angioplasty and stenting with properly organized randomized controlled trials. Further attempts are needed to develop special venous stents and to decrease thrombotic complications and formation of pseudointima that cause in-stent restenosis. Open and hybrid reconstructions are safe and durable, but the number of procedures in general is small and special training and expertise for reconstructive venous surgery is recommended. Autologous vein should be used for infrainguinal reconstructions and for treatment of unilateral iliac vein obstruction with a femoro-femoral cross-over bypass (Palma procedure). IVC and iliac vein reconstructions with ePTFE grafts provide superb result in patients who need excision of malignant tumors invading large veins. Open and hybrid reconstructions are here to stay and they remain excellent options for those patients who are unsuitable for or fail endovascular repair.

Zusammenfassung

Max Ratschow war ein bemerkenswerter Arzt und eine internationale Autorität im Bereich der Angiologie. Die Ratschow-Vorlesung führt das Lebenswerk dieses Pioniers weiter: die Untersuchung und Behandlung vaskulärer Erkrankungen voran zu bringen. Die Max RatschowVorlesung 2017 behandelt einige aktuelle Entwicklungen und Kontroversen im Bereich der venösen Erkrankungen. Die Phlebologie, einst ein vernachlässigtes Gebiet in der Angiologie, ist eine Disziplin mit konstantem Fort-schritt innerhalb der letzten Jahrzehnte. Endovaskulare Techniken revolutionierten die Behandlung der Patienten mit großen Venenobstruktionen und stellten sichere, minimal-invasive Eingriffe mit exzellenten Langzeitergebnissen dar. Die Aufmerksamkeit sollte sich nun fokussieren auf vergleichende Studien, um die wissenschaftliche Nachweisbarkeit der Effektivität der venösen Angioplastie und des Stentings mit entsprechenden kontrollierten, randomisierten Studien zu stützen. Weitere Untersuchungen sind notwendig, um spezielle venöse Stents zu entwickeln und thrombotische Komplikationen und die Entwicklung von Pseudointima zu reduzieren, die die In-stentRestenosis verursachen. Offene und Hybrid-Rekonstruktionen sind sicher und dauerhaft, aber die Zahl der Eingriffe dieser Art sind ge-ring und ein Spezialtraining und Expertise für rekonstruktive Venenchirurgie wird empfohlen. Autologe Venen können für infrainguinale Rekonstruktionen genutzt werden und für die Behandlung von unilateralen Iliac-Venenrekonstruktionen mit einem femoro-femoral Crossover-Bypass (Palma Prozedur). IVC und die Iliac-Venenrekonstruktionen mit ePTFE-Grafts zeigen ein hervorragendes Ergebnis bei Patienten, die eine Exzision von malignen Tumoren benötigen, die in die großen Venen einwachsen. Offene und Hybrid-Rekonstuktionen sind dafür geeignet und bleiben eine exzellente Option für Patienten, die nicht geeignet sind für eine endovaskuläre Intervention.

Keywords

Vein reconstruction - endovascular technique - vein surgery

Schlüsselwörter

Venenrekonstruktion - endovaskuläre Techniken - Venenchirurgie

* Presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Phlebology and the 17th Annual Meeting of the German, Austrian and Swiss Societies of Angiologie, in Dresden, Germany, September 9, 2016.


 

  • References

  • 1 Ratschow M. Die peripheren Durchblutungsstörungen. Dresden: Steinkopff; 1939
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Ratschow M. Angiologie: Pathologie, Klinik und Therapie der peripheren Durchblutungsstörungen. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1959
    Google Scholar
  • 3 May R, Weber J. Pelvic and abdominal veins. Progress in diagnosis and therapy. Amsterdam: Excerpta medica; 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Gloviczki P. et al. Experimental replacement of the inferior vena cava: factors affecting patency. Surgery 1984; 95: 657-666.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Menawat SS, Gloviczki P, Mozes G. et al. Effect of a femoral arteriovenous fistula on lower extremity venous hemodynamics after femorocaval reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 1996; 24: 793-799.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Alimi YS, Gloviczki P, Vrtiska TJ. et al. Reconstruction of the superior vena cava: benefits of postoperative surveillance and secondary endovascular interventions. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27: 287-299 300–301.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jost CJ, Gloviczki P, Cherry Jr KJ. et al. Surgical reconstruction of iliofemoral veins and the inferior vena cava for nonmalignant occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33: 320-327 discussion 7–8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Garg NG. et al. Factors affecting outcome of open and hybrid reconstructions for nonmalignant obstruction of iliofemoral veins and inferior vena cava. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 383-393.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rizvi AZ. et al. Benign superior vena cava syndrome: stenting is now the first line of treatment. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 372-380.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gloviczki P, Pairolero PC, Cherry KJ, Hallett Jr JW. Reconstruction of the vena cava and of its primary tributaries: a preliminary report. J Vasc Surg 1990; 11: 373-381.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gloviczki P. The development and clinical practice of caval reconstructions at Mayo Clinic (In French). In: Fichelle JM. ed. Techniques et Strategie en Chirurgie Vasculaire. Paris: Editions AERCV; 1993: 233-249.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Gloviczki P, Oldenburg WA, Stone WM. Milestones of Mayo Clinic and the Gonda Vascular Center with a brief history of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. In: Gloviczki P. et al. eds. Mayo Clinic International Vascular Symposium 2011: Advances and Controversies in Vascular Medicine, Vascular Surgery and Endovenous Interventions. 2011: 453-463.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Mayo CH. Varicose veins of the lower extremity. ST Paul MJ 1900; 2: 595-598.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Mayo CH. Treatment of varicose veins. Surg Obstet Gynecol 1906; 2: 385-388.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Myers TT. Results and technique of stripping operation for varicose veins. J Am Med Assoc 1957; 163: 87-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lofgren KA. Management of varicose veins: Mayo Clinic experience. In: J.J. B, J.S.T. Y, eds. Venous Problems. Chicago: Yearbook medical Publishers; 1978: 71-84.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Allen EV, Barker NW, Hines EA. Peripheral vascular diseases. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1946
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Gloviczki P, Merrell SW, Bower TC. Femoral vein valve repair under direct vision without venotomy: a modified technique with use of angioscopy. J Vasc Surg 1991; 14: 645-648.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gloviczki P, Bergan JJ. eds. Atlas of endoscopic perforator vein surgery. London: Springer; 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Rana MA. et al. Open surgical removal of retained and dislodged inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2015; 3: 201-206.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Rathore A. et al. Open surgical removal of iliac vein Wallstents with excision of pseudointima obstructing the contralateral iliac vein. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2016; 4: 525-529.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gloviczki PJ. January Morning: An Autoethno-graphic Poem. Health Commun 2016; 31: 1436.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jayaraj A, Gloviczki P, Peeran S, Canton L. Hybrid intervention for treatment of the nutcracker syndrome. J Vasc Surg Cases 2016; 1: 268-271.
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Power AH, Gloviczki P. Left iliac vein occlusion treated with a Palma procedure. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2014; 2: 204-205.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gloviczki P, Pairolero PC, Toomey BJ. et al. Reconstruction of large veins for nonmalignant venous occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1992; 16: 750-761.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gloviczki P, Kalra M, Duncan AA. et al. Open and hybrid deep vein reconstructions: to do or not to do?. Phlebology 2012; 27 (Suppl. 01) 103-106.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kalra M, Gloviczki P, Andrews JC. et al. Open surgical and endovascular treatment of superior vena cava syndrome caused by nonmalignant disease. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 215-223.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rhee RY. et al. Iliocaval complications of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Am J Surg 1994; 168: 179-183.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bower TC, Nagorney DM, Cherry Jr KJ. et al. Replacement of the inferior vena cava for malignancy: an update. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31: 270-281.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bower TC. et al. Outcomes of 102 Patients Treated With Segmental Inferior Vena Cava Resection and Graft Replacement for Malignant Disease. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59: 36S.
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Kurstjens R, de Wolf M, Kleijnen J, de Graaf R, Wittens C. The predictive value of haemodynamic parameters for outcome of deep venous reconstructions in patients with chronic deep vein obstruction – A systematic review. Phlebology. 2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Vogel D. et al. Common femoral endovenectomy with iliocaval endoluminal recanalization improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with postthrombotic iliofemoral obstruction. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 129-135.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 de Wolf MA, Arnoldussen CW, Grommes J. et al. Minimally invasive treatment of chronic iliofemoral venous occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2013; 1: 146-153.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lu T, de Grandis E, Gloviczki P. et alF. MayThurner syndrome associated with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy 2012; 24: 155-160.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Raju S, Neglen P. High prevalence of nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions in chronic venous disease: a permissive role in pathogenicity. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 136-143 discussion 44.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Raju S, Neglen P. Percutaneous recanalization of total occlusions of the iliac vein. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50: 360-368.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Neglen P, Hollis KC, Olivier J, Raju S. Stenting of the venous outflow in chronic venous disease: long-term stent-related outcome, clinical, and hemodynamic result. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 979-990.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kurklinsky AK, Bjarnason H, Friese JL. et al. Outcomes of venoplasty with stent placement for chronic thrombosis of the iliac and femoral veins: single-center experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23: 1009-1015.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Razavi MK. et al. Safety and Effectiveness of Stent Placement for Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: e002772.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Seager MJ, Busuttil A, Dharmarajah B, Davies AH. Editor‘s Choice – A Systematic Review of Endovenous Stenting in Chronic Venous Disease Secondary to Iliac Vein Obstruction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016; 51 (Suppl. 01) 100-120.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Gloviczki P, Lawrence PF. Iliac vein stenting and contralateral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017; 5: 5-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Vedantham S. et al. Rationale and design of the ATTRACT Study: a multicenter randomized trial to evaluate pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for the prevention of postthrombotic syndrome in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis. Am Heart J 2013; 165: 523-530e3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Puggioni A. et al. Surgical disobliteration of postthrombotic deep veins – endophlebectomy is feasible. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 1048-1052 disc. 52.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bower TC. Primary and secondary tumors of the inferior vena cava and iliac veins. In: Gloviczki P. ed. Handbook of Venous Disorders, Guidelines of the American Venous Forum. 3rd ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2009: 574-582.
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Erben Y, Gloviczki P, Kalra M. et al. Treatment of Nutcracker Syndrome with Open and Endovascular Interventions. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2014; 2: 116.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Said SM, Gloviczki P, Kalra M. et al. Renal nutcracker syndrome: surgical options. Semin Vasc Surg 2013; 26: 35-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Warren R, Thayer TR. Transplantation of the saphenous vein for postphlebitic stasis. Surgery 1954; 35: 867-878.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Husni EA. In situ saphenopopliteal bypass graft for incompetence of the femoral and popliteal veins. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970; 130: 279-284.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Ryer EJ. et al. Great saphenous vein transposition to the popliteal vein (the May-Husni procedure). J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2013; 1: 82-83.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Coleman DM, Rectenwald JE, Vandy FC, Wakefield TW. Contemporary results after sapheno-popliteal bypass for chronic femoral vein occlusion. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2013; 1: 45-51.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Shaydakov E, Porembskaya O, Geroulakos G. The May-Husni Procedure: A Reappraisal. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50: 513-517.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Palma EC, Esperon R. Vein transplants and grafts in the surgical treatment of the postphlebitic syndrome. J Cardiovas Surg 1960; 1: 94-107.
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Palma EC, Esperon R. [Treatment of the post-thrombophlebitic syndrome by means of internal saphenous transplants]. Bol Soc Cir Urug 1959; 30: 115-125.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Mendes BC. et al. Patency and clinical success 22 years after the Palma procedure. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2016; 4: 95-96.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Gruss JD, Bartels D, Vargas-Montano H. [Reconstruction of unilateral iliac vein occlusion]. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1988; (Suppl. 02) 181-186.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Fahrni J, Gloviczki P. Percutaneous closure of adjunctive arteriovenous fistulas after surgical reconstruction of iliac veins. J Vasc Surg Cases 2016; 2: 66-67.
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Sottiurai V. Results of deep-vein reconstruction. Vasc Surg 1997; 31: 236-238.
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Quinones-Baldrich W, Alktaifi A, Eilber F. Inferior vena cava resection and reconstruction for retroperitoneal tumor excision. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 1386-1393 discussion 93.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar