Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2016; 115(04): 685-711
DOI: 10.1160/TH15-09-0703
Position Paper
Schattauer GmbH

Oral anticoagulants in coronary heart disease (Section IV) Position paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis – Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease

Raffaele De Caterina   *   **
1   “G. d’Annunzio” University, Chieti and Fondazione Toscana “G. Monasterio”, Pisa, Italy
,
Steen Husted   *   **
2   University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
,
Lars Wallentin   *   **
3   Uppsala Clinical Research Center, University of Uppsala, Sweden
,
Felicita Andreotti   **
4   Catholic University, Rome, Italy
,
Harald Arnesen   **
5   Oslo University Hospital Ullevál and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
,
Fedor Bachmann   **
6   University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
,
Colin Baigent   **
7   University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
,
Jean-Philippe Collet   **
8   INSERM UMRS-ICAN 1166, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpétriére, Paris, France
,
Sigrun Halvorsen   **
5   Oslo University Hospital Ullevál and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
,
Kurt Huber   **
9   Wilhelminenhospital, Vienna, Austria
,
Jørgen Jespersen   **
10   University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
,
Steen Dalby Kristensen   **
11   Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
Gregory Y. H. Lip   **
12   University of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
,
João Morais   **
13   Hospital Santo Andre, Leiria, Portugal
,
Lars Hvilsted Rasmussen   **
14   Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
,
Fabrizio Ricci   **
1   “G. d’Annunzio” University, Chieti and Fondazione Toscana “G. Monasterio”, Pisa, Italy
,
Dirk Sibbing   **
15   Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany, DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
,
Agneta Siegbahn   **
3   Uppsala Clinical Research Center, University of Uppsala, Sweden
,
Robert F. Storey   **
16   University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
,
Jurrien ten Berg   **
17   St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
,
Freek W. A. Verheugt   **
18   Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
,
Jeffrey I. Weitz
19   McMaster University and Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 05 September 2015

Accepted after major revision: 29 January 2016

Publication Date:
28 November 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Until recently, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were the only available oral anticoagulants evaluated for long-term treatment of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), particularly after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite efficacy in this setting, VKAs are rarely used because they are cumbersome to administer. Instead, the more readily manageable antiplatelet agents are the mainstay of prevention in ACS patients. This situation has the potential to change with the introduction of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which are easier to administer than VKAs because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. The NOACs include dabigatran, which inhibits thrombin, and apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban, which inhibit factor Xa. Apixaban and rivaroxaban were evaluated in phase III trials for prevention of recurrent ischaemia in ACS patients, most of whom were also receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Although at the doses tested rivaroxaban was effective and apixaban was not, both agents increased major bleeding. The role for the NOACs in ACS management, although promising, is therefore complicated, because it is uncertain how they compare with newer antiplatelet agents, such as prasugrel, ticagrelor or vorapaxar, and because their safety in combination with these other drugs is unknown. Ongoing studies are also now evaluating the use of NOACs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients, where their role is established, with coexistent ACS or coronary stenting. Focusing on CHD, we review the results of clinical trials with the NOACs and provide a perspective on their future incorporation into clinical practice.

Note: The review process for this paper was fully handled by Christian Weber, Editor in Chief.

Keywords

Anticoagulants - vitamin K antagonists - non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants - dabigatran etexilate - rivaroxaban - apixaban - edoxaban - coronary heart disease - acute coronary syndrome

* Coordinating Committee Member


** Task Force Member


 

  • References

  • 1 De Caterina R. et al. New oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndromes: ESC Working Group on Thrombosis-Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease Position Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1413-1425.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 De Caterina R. et al. Vitamin K antagonists in heart disease: current status and perspectives (Section III). Position paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis--Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease. Thromb Haemost 2013; 110: 1087-1107.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Husted S. et al. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs): No longer new or novel. Thromb Haemost 2014; 111: 781-782.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ruff CT. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 383: 955-962.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Renda G. et al. Net Clinical Benefit of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Vs Warfarin in Phase III Atrial Fibrillation Trials. Am J Med 2015; 128: 1007-1014 e2.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 De Caterina R. et al. Parenteral anticoagulants in heart disease: current status and perspectives (Section II). Position paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis-Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease. Thromb Haemost 2013; 109: 769-786.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 De Caterina R. et al. General mechanisms of coagulation and targets of anticoagulants (Section I). Position Paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis--Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease. Thromb Haemost 2013; 109: 569-579.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rona G. The pathogenesis of human myocardial infarction. Can Med Assoc J 1966; 95: 1012-1019.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Baroldi G. Lack of correlation between coronary thrombosis and myocardial infarction or sudden “coronary” heart death. Ann NY Acad Sci 1969; 156: 504-525.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 DeWood MA. et al. Prevalence of total coronary occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 897-902.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ferrante G. et al. High levels of systemic myeloperoxidase are associated with coronary plaque erosion in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a clinico-pathological study. Circulation 2010; 122: 2505-2513.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Davies MJ, Thomas T. The pathological basis and microanatomy of occlusive thrombus formation in human coronary arteries. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1981; 294: 225-229.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Davies MJ. The pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes. Heart 2000; 83: 361-366.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Falk E. Unstable angina with fatal outcome: dynamic coronary thrombosis leading to infarction and/or sudden death. Autopsy evidence of recurrent mural thrombosis with peripheral embolisation culminating in total vascular occlusion. Circulation 1985; 71: 699-708.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yunoki K. et al. Thrombus aspiration therapy and coronary thrombus components in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Atheroscler Thromb 2013; 20: 524-537.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jia H. et al. In vivo diagnosis of plaque erosion and calcified nodule in patients with acute coronary syndrome by intravascular optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 1748-1758.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Meade TW. et al. Haemostatic function and ischaemic heart disease: principal results of the Northwick Park Heart Study. Lancet 1986; 02: 533-537.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Trip MD. et al. Platelet hyperreactivity and prognosis in survivors of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1549-1554.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Merlini PA. et al. Persistent activation of coagulation mechanism in unstable angina and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1994; 90: 61-68.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Burzotta F. et al. Increased prevalence of the G20210A prothrombin gene variant in acute coronary syndromes without metabolic or acquired risk factors or with limited extent of disease. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 26-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Baigent C. et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet 2009; 373: 1849-1860.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Patrono C. et al. Antiplatelet agents for the treatment and prevention of athero-thrombosis. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2922-2932.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Navarese EP. et al. Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 2015; 350: h1618.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Leon MB. et al. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1665-1671.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Stent Anticoagulation Restenosis Study Investigators. A double-blind trial to assess long-term oral anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients after myocardial infarction. Report of the Sixty Plus Reinfarction Study Research Group. Lancet 1980; 02: 989-994.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell‘Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Long-term effects of intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: final report of the GISSI study. Lancet 1987; 02: 871-874.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet 1988; 02: 349-360.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists’ (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet 1994; 343: 311-322.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mega JL. et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 9-19.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Morrow DA. et al. Vorapaxar in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1404-1413.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Fox KAA. et al. for the GRACE Investigators. Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999-2006. J Am Med Assoc 2007; 297: 1892-1900.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Fox KAA. et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). Br Med J 2006; 333: 1091-1094.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Nagata Y. et al. Characteristics of the pathological images of coronary artery thrombi according to the infarct-related coronary artery in acute myocardial infarction. Circ J 2004; 68: 308-314.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Silvain J. et al. Composition of coronary thrombus in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 1359-1367.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ramaiola I. et al. Changes in thrombus composition and profilin-1 release in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 965-975.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Paikin JS. et al. Timing the First Postoperative Dose of Anticoagulants: Lessons Learned From Clinical Trials. Chest 2015; 148: 587-595.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Eisert WG. et al. Dabigatran: an oral novel potent reversible nonpeptide inhibitor of thrombin. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010; 30: 1885-1889.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Weitz JI. Factor Xa and thrombin as targets for new oral anticoagulants. Thromb Res 2011; 127 (Suppl. 02) S5-S12.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 The Medical Research Council’s General Practice Research Framework. Thrombosis prevention trial: randomised trial of low-intensity oral anticoagulation with warfarin and low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in men at increased risk. Lancet 1998; 351: 233-241.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Husted SE. et al. Long-term anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 913-919.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. Br Med J 2002; 324: 71-86.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Breddin K. et al. The German-Austrian aspirin trial: a comparison of acetylsalicylic acid, placebo and phenprocoumon in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. On behalf of the German-Austrian Study Group. Circulation 1980; 62: V63-72.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 The EPSIM Research Group. A controlled comparison of aspirin and oral anticoagulants in prevention of death after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 701-708.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Julian DG. et al. A comparison of aspirin and anticoagulation following thrombolysis for myocardial infarction (the AFTER study): a multicentre unblinded randomised clinical trial. Br Med J 1996; 313: 1429-1431.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Anand SS, Yusuf S. Oral anticoagulants in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 62S-69S.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Smith P. et al. The effect of warfarin on mortality and reinfarction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 147-152.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Anticoagulants in the Secondary Prevention of Events in Coronary Thrombosis (ASPECT) Research Group. Effect of long-term oral anticoagulant treatment on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after myocardial infarction. Lancet 1994; 343: 499-503.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Fiore LD. et al. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Trial comparing combined warfarin and aspirin with aspirin alone in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: primary results of the CHAMP study. Circulation 2002; 105: 557-563.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Herlitz J. et al. Effect of fixed low-dose warfarin added to aspirin in the long term after acute myocardial infarction; the LoWASA Study. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 232-239.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 van Es RF. et al. Aspirin and coumadin after acute coronary syndromes (the AS-PECT-2 study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 109-113.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Hurlen M. et al. Warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 969-974.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Andreotti F. et al. Aspirin plus warfarin compared to aspirin alone after acute coronary syndromes: an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis of 25 307 patients. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 519-526.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Brouwer MA, Verheugt FW. Oral anticoagulation for acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2002; 105: 1270-1274.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Gohlke H. et al. Improved graft patency with anticoagulant therapy after aorto-coronary bypass surgery: a prospective, randomised study. Circulation 1981; 64: II22-27.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 McEnany MT. et al. The effect of antithrombotic therapy on patency rates of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 83: 81-89.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Brooks N. et al. Randomised placebo controlled trial of aspirin and dipyrida-mole in the prevention of coronary vein graft occlusion. Br Heart J 1985; 53: 201-207.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Pfisterer M. et al. Trial of low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole vs anticoagulants for prevention of aortocoronary vein graft occlusion. Lancet 1989; 02: 1-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 van der Meer J. et al. Prevention of one-year vein-graft occlusion after aortocor-onary-bypass surgery: a comparison of low-dose aspirin, low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole, and oral anticoagulants. The CABADAS Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. Lancet 1993; 342: 257-264.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Knatterud GL. et al. Long-term effects on clinical outcomes of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and low-dose anticoagulation in the post coronary artery bypass graft trial. Post CABG Investigators. Circulation 2000; 102: 157-165.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 ten Berg JM. et al. Effect of coumarins started before coronary angioplasty on acute complications and long-term follow-up: a randomised trial. Circulation 2000; 102: 386-391.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Schömig A. et al. A randomised comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1084-1089.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Windecker S. et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revasculari-sation: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularisation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2541-2619.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Stone GW. et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 226-235.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Mauri L. et al. Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1373-1374.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Bonaca MP. et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1791-1800.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Udell JA. et al. Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in the subgroup of patients with previous myocardial infarction: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur Heart J. 2015 Epub ahead of print.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Hansen ML. et al. Risk of bleeding with single, dual, or triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Int Med 2010; 170: 1433-1441.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Lamberts M. et al. Bleeding after initiation of multiple antithrombotic drugs, including triple therapy, in atrial fibrillation patients following myocardial infarction and coronary intervention: a nationwide cohort study. Circulation 2012; 126: 1185-1193.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Wallentin L. et al. Oral ximelagatran for secondary prophylaxis after myocardial infarction: the ESTEEM randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 789-797.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Oldgren J. et al. Dabigatran vs. placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2781-2789.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Mega JL. et al. Rivaroxaban vs placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 29-38.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Alexander JH. et al. Apixaban, an oral, direct, selective factor Xa inhibitor, in combination with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: results of the Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischaemic and Safety Events (APPRAISE) trial. Circulation 2009; 119: 2877-2885.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Steg PG. et al. RUBY-1: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety and tolerability of the novel oral factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) following acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2541-2554.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Goldstein S. Safety evaluation of the factor Xa inhibitor TAK-442 in subjects with acute coronary syndromes: phase 2 AXIOM-ACS trial results. Available at: http://spo.escardio.org/SessionDetails.aspx?eevtid=48&sessId=8199&subSessId=1307&searchQuery=&presId=59578&doc=Abstract#.UwnlCr9BpqM32.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Christersson C. et al. Treatment with an oral direct thrombin inhibitor decreases platelet activity but increases markers of inflammation in patients with myocardial infarction. J Intern Med 2011; 270: 215-223.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Goldstein S. et al. Phase 2 study of TAK-442, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, in patients following acute coronary syndrome. Thromb Haemost 2014; 111: 1141-1152.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Alexander JH. et al. for the APPRAISE 2 Investigators. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 699-708.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Gibson CM. et al. Rationale and design of the Anti-Xa therapy to lower cardiovascular events in addition to standard therapy in subjects with acute coronary syndrome-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 51 (ATLAS-ACS 2 TIMI 51) trial: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in subjects with acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 815-821 e6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Granger CB. et al. for the ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Apixaban vs Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981-992.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J. et al. Rivaroxaban vs warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883-889.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Simoons ML. et al. A dose-finding study of fondaparinux in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the Pentasaccharide in Unstable Angina (PENTUA) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 2183-2190.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Weitz JI. Insights into the role of thrombin in the pathogenesis of recurrent ischaemia after acute coronary syndrome. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112: 924-931.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Bayer Pharma AG. Xarelto* (rivaroxaban) Summary of Product Characteristics. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000944/WC500057108.pdf. Accessed May 16, 2014.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Mega JL. et al. Genetic variants in ABCB1 and CYP2C19 and cardiovascular outcomes after treatment with clopidogrel and prasugrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial: a pharmacogenetic analysis. Lancet 2010; 376: 1312-1319.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Wiviott SD. et al. Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 trial. Circulation 2007; 116: 2923-2932.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Small DS. et al. Effects of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the phar-macokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel and clopidogrel. J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 48: 475-484.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Wiviott SD. et al. Prasugrel vs clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Roe MT. et al. Prasugrel vs clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularisation. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1297-1309.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Montalescot G. et al. Pretreatment with prasugrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 999-1010.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Wallentin L. et al. Ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Montalescot G. et al. Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1016-1027.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Bonaca MP. et al. Design and rationale for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54 (PEGASUS-TIMI 54) trial. Am Heart J 2014; 167: 437-444 e5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Cannon CP. et al. Safety, tolerability, and initial efficacy of AZD6140, the first reversible oral adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, compared with clopidogrel, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: primary results of the DISPERSE-2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 1844-1851.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Palmerini T. et al. Mortality in patients treated with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a pairwise and Baye-sian network meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2015; 385: 2371-2382.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Elmariah S. et al. Extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2015; 385: 792-798.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Serebruany V. et al. Solid cancers after antiplatelet therapy: Confirmations, controversies, and challenges. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114: 1104-1112.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 De Caterina R. Cancer after intense and prolonged antiplatelet therapies - fact or fiction?. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114: 1100-1103.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Leonardi S, Becker RC. PAR-1 inhibitors: a novel class of antiplatelet agents for the treatment of patients with atherothrombosis. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2012; 239-260.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Tricoci P. et al. Vorapaxar with or without clopidogrel after non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the thrombin receptor antagonist for clinical event reduction in acute coronary syndrome trial. Am Heart J 2014; 168: 869-877 e1.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Scirica BM. et al. Vorapaxar for secondary prevention of thrombotic events for patients with previous myocardial infarction: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial. Lancet 2012; 380: 1317-1324.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Roffi M. et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 267-315.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Steg PG. et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2569-2619.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Levine GN. et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: e44-122.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Amsterdam EA. et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: e139-228.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 O’Gara PT. et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 485-510.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Bhatt DL. et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin vs aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1706-1717.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Andreotti F. et al. Antithrombotic therapy in the elderly: expert position paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 3238-3249.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Vranckx P. et al. Peri-procedural use of rivaroxaban in elective percutaneous coronary intervention to treat stable coronary artery disease. The X-PLORER trial. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114: 258-267.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Kralev S. et al. Incidence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time coronary angiography. PLoS One 2011; 06: e24964.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Almendro-Delia M. et al. Prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation in acute coronary syndromes: results from the ARIAM registry. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2014; 03: 141-148.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Dewilde WJ. et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 1107-1115.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Rubboli A, De Caterina R. The WOEST study: Critical considerations and applicability. Cor et Vasa; 56: e254-e258.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Fiedler KA. et al. Duration of Triple Therapy in Patients Requiring Oral Anti-coagulation After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The ISAR-TRIPLE Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 1619-1629.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Lip GY. et al. Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention/ stenting. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 13-28.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Lip GY. et al. Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary or valve interventions: a joint consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and European Association of Acute Cardiac Care (ACCA) endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 3155-3179.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Sarno G. et al. Stent thrombosis in new-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI: a report from SCAAR. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 16-24.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Urban P. et al. Polymer-free Drug-Coated Coronary Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2038-2047.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Capodanno D. et al. Triple antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients with acute coronary syndromes or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. EuroIntervention 2015; 10: 1015-1021.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Heidbuchel H. et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2015; 17: 467-507.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Dans AL. et al. Concomitant use of antiplatelet therapy with dabigatran or warfarin in the Randomised Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation 2013; 127: 634-640.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Alexander JH. et al. Apixaban vs. warfarin with concomitant aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARISTOTLE trial. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 224-232.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Giugliano RP. et al. Edoxaban vs warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 2093-2104.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Rubboli A. et al. The optimal management of patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary artery stenting. The 10th Anniversary Overview. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112: 1080-1107.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Capodanno D, Lip GY. Triple therapy for atrial fibrillation and ACS with or without PCI: don‘t drop aspirin just yet. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 515-516.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar