2B or not 2B? Disparate discrimination of functional VWF discordance using different assay panels or methodologies may lead to success or failure in the early identification of type 2B VWD

Summary

Laboratory proficiency in the identification of functional von Willebrand factor (VWF) discordance in type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD) was assessed by external quality assurance surveys conducted by the RCPA Haematology QAP, and using six different type 2B VWD plasma samples (three historical and three previously unpublished) tested by up to 52 laboratories. For the three most recent samples, functional VWF discordance was either not identified in testing or by interpretation with misidentification as ‘normal’ or ‘type 1 VWD’, on average for 25.7% of test occasions when laboratories performed VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo as their primary VWF test panel, but somewhat fewer occasions (10.9%) for laboratories that incorporated VWF:CB as an additional functional VWF assay. VWF assay sub-methodologies also influenced the appropriate identification of samples as potentially type 2 VWD, and VWF functional discordance was more consistently identified when laboratories used (i) automated platelet agglutination for VWF:RCo compared to classical platelet aggregometry, (ii) inhouse VWF:CB assays compared to commercial kit methods, and (iii) automated LIA-based ‘VWF:Activity’ assays compared to ELISA based assays.We conclude that:(i) laboratories are generally proficient in tests for VWD but interpretative diagnostic errors do occur; (ii) correct diagnosis is more likely when test panels are more comprehensive and include the VWF:CB; (iii) sub-methodology influences the appropriate identification of VWF functional discordance. On the basis of these findings, we provide a series of recommendations to enable the appropriate laboratory identification of VWD, in particular type 2B VWD.

Keywords

von Willebrand factor - VWF - von Willebrand’s disorder - von Willebrand’s disease - VWD - laboratory assessment - survey - haemostasis testing - diagnostic practice - quality control - quality assurance

• References

• 1 Sadler JE, Budde U, Eikenboom JCJ. et al. and the Working Party on von Willebrand Disease Classification. Update on the pathophysiology and classification of von Willebrand disease: a report of the Subcommittee on von Willebrand Factor. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 2103-2114.
• 2 Michiels JJ, Berneman Z, Gadisseur A. et al. Classification and characterization of hereditary types 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, 2M, 2N, and 2U (unclassifiable) von Willebrand disease. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2006; 12: 397-420.
• 3 Budde U, Pieconka A, Will K. et al. Laboratory testing for von Willebrand disease: Contribution of multimer analysis to diagnosis and classification. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32: 514-521.
• 4 Favaloro EJ. von Willebrand factor (VWF) collagen binding (activity) assay (VWF:CBA) in the diagnosis of von Willebrand’s disorder (VWD): A 15-year journey. Semin Thromb Hemost 2002; 28: 191-202.
• 5 Favaloro EJ. Laboratory identification of von Willebrand Disease: Technical and scientific perspectives. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2006; 32: 456-471.
• 6 Nurden P, Lanza F, Bonnafous-Faurie C, Nurden A. A second report of platelet-type von Willebrand disease with a Gly233Ser mutation in the GPIBA gene. Thromb Haemost 2007; 97: 319-321.
• 7 Cumming A, Grundy P, Keeney S. et al.; on behalf of the UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors’ Organisation.. An investigation of the von Willebrand factor genotype in UK patients diagnosed to have type 1 von Willebrand disease. Thromb Haemost 2006; 96: 630-641.
• 8 Hilbert L, Nurden P, Caron C. et al., and the INSERM Network on Molecular Abnormalities in von Willebrand Disease.. Type 2N von Willebrand disease due to compound heterozygosity for R854Q and a novel R763G mutation at the cleavage site of von Willebrand factor propeptide. Thromb Haemost 2006; 96: 290-294.
• 9 Casais P, Carballo GA, Woods AI. et al. 2R924Q substitution encoded within exon 21 of the von Willebrand Factor gene related to mild bleeding phenotype. Thromb Haemost 2006; 96: 228-230.
• 10 RCPA Haematology QAP contact and program details available at http://www.rcpaqap.com.au . Last accessed 14^thSeptember, 2006.
• 11 Favaloro EJ, Smith J, Petinos P. et al., on behalf of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program (QAP) in Haematology Haemostasis Scientific Advisory Panel.. Laboratory testing for von Willebrand’s disease: An assessment of current diagnostic practice and efficacy by means of a multi-laboratory survey. Thromb Haemost 1999; 82: 1276-1282.
• 12 Favaloro EJ, Thom J, Baker R. on behalf of the Australasian Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis Emerging Technologies Group.. Assessment of current diagnostic practice and efficacy in testing for von Willebrand’s disease: Results from the second Australasian laboratory survey. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2000; 11: 729-738.
• 13 Favaloro EJ, Bonar R, Sioufi J. et al., on behalf of the RCPA QAP in Haematology Haemostasis Committee.. Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disorder: Current practice in the Southern Hemisphere. Am J Clin Path 2003; 119: 882-893.
• 14 Favaloro EJ, Bonar R, Kershaw G. et al., on behalf of the RCPA QAP in Haematology.. Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disorder: Quality and diagnostic improvements driven by peer review in a multilaboratory test process. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 232-242.
• 15 Favaloro EJ, Bonar R, Kershaw G. et al., on behalf of the RCPA QAP in Haematology.. Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disorder: Use of multiple functional assays reduces diagnostic error rates. Lab Hematol 2005; 11: 91-97.
• 16 Favaloro EJ, Bonar B, Kershaw G. et al., on behalf of the RCPA QAP in Haematology.. Reducing errors in identification of von Willebrand disease: The experience of the Royal college of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32: 505-513.
• 17 Favaloro EJ. 2B or not 2B? Differential identification of type 2B, versus pseudo-von Willebrand disease. Br J Haematol 2006; 135: 141-142.
• 18 Favaloro EJ, Soltani S, McDonald J. et al. Reassessment of ABO-blood group, gender and age on laboratory parameters used to diagnose von Willebrand Disorder (VWD): Potential influence on the diagnosis versus the potential association with risk of thrombosis. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 124: 910-917.
• 19 Favaloro EJ. Collagen binding assay for von Willebrand Factor (VWF:CBA): Detection of von Willebrands Disease (VWD), and discrimination of VWD subtypes, depends on collagen source. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 127-135.
• 20 Goodall AH, Jarvis J, Chand S. et al. An immunoradiometric assay for human factor VIII von Willebrand factor (VIII:VWF) using a monoclonal antibody based that defines a functional epitope. Br J Haematol 1985; 59: 565-577.
• 21 Chand S, McCraw A, Hutton R. et al. A two-site, monoclonal antibody based immunoassay for von Willebrand factor- Demonstration that VWF function resides in a conformational epitope. Thromb Haemost 1986; 55: 318-324.
• 22 Murdock PJ, Woodhams BJ, Mathews KB. et al. von Willebrand factor activity detected in a monoclonal antibody-based ELISA: an alternative to the Ristocetin cofactor platelet agglutination assay for diagnostic use. Thromb Haemost 1997; 78: 1272-1277.
• 23 Favaloro EJ, Henniker A, Facey D. et al. Discrimination of von Willebrands disease (VWD) subtypes: Direct comparison of von Willebrand factor:collagen binding activity/assay (VWF:CBA) with monoclonal antibody (MAB) based ELISA VWF-detection systems. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84: 541-547.
• 24 Favaloro EJ. Discrimination of von Willebrands disease (VWD) subtypes: Direct comparison of commercial ELISA-based options used to detect qualitative von Willebrand factor (VWF) defects. Am J Clin Pathol 2000; 114: 608-618.
• 25 De Vleeschauwer A, Devreese K. Comparison of a new automated von Willebrand factor activity assay with an aggregation von Willebrand ristocetin cofactor activity assay for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease. Blood Coag Fibrinolysis 2006; 17: 353-358.
• 26 Sucker C, Senft B, Scharf RE. et al. Determination of von Willebrand factor activity: Evaluation of the HaemosIL™ assay in comparison with established procedures. Clin Appl Thromb/Hemostas 2006; 12: 305-310.
• 27 Vanhoorelbeke K, Cauwenberghs N, Vauterin S. et al. A reliable and reproducible ELISA method to measure ristocetin cofactor activity of von Willebrand factor. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 107-113.
• 28 Federici AB, Anciani MTC, Forza I. et al. A sensitive ristocetin co-factor activity assay with recombinant glycoprotein Iba for the diagnosis of patients with low von Willebrand factor levels. Haematologica 2004; 89: 77-85.
• 29 Vanhoorelbeke K, Pareyn I, Schlammadinger A. et al. Plasma glycocalicin as a source of GPIb alpha in the von Willebrand factor in the ristocetin cofactor ELISA. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93: 165-171.
• 30 Baronciani L, Federici AB, Cozzi G. et al. von Willebrand factor collagen binding assay in von Willebrand disease type 2A, 2B, and 2M. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 2088-2090.
• 31 Fischer BE, Thomas KB, Dorner F. von Willebrand factor: measuring its antigen of function? Correlation between the level of antigen, activity, and multimer size using various detection systems. Thromb Res 1998; 91: 39-43.
• 32 Hubbard AR, Sands D, Chang AC. et al. Standardisation of von Willebrand Factor in therapeutic concentrates: calibration of the 1st International Standard for von Willebrand Factor Concentrate (00/514). Thromb Haemost 2002; 88: 380-386.
• 33 Hubbard AR. von Willebrand factor standards for plasma and concentrate testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32: 522-528.
• 34 Federici AB, Canciani MT, Forza I. et al. Ristocetin cofactor and collagen binding activities normalized to antigen levels for a rapid diagnosis of type 2 von Willebrand disease. Single center comparison of four different assays. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84: 1127-1128.
• 35 Neugebauer BM, Goy C, Budek I. et al. Comparison of two von Willebrand factor collagen-binding assays with different binding affinities for low, medium and high multimers of von Willebrand factor. Semin Thromb Hemost 2002; 28: 139-147.
• 36 Casonato A, Pontara E, Bertomoro A. et al. von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: An alternative to ristocetin cofactor activity?. Br J Haematol 2001; 112: 578-583.
• 37 Hayes TE, Brandt JT, Chandler WL. et al. External peer review quality assurance testing in von Willebrand disease: The recent experience of the United States College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Program. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32: 499-504.
• 38 Kitchen S, Jennings I, Woods TAL. et al. Laboratory tests for measurement of von Willebrand factor show poor agreement between different centres: Results from the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Blood Coagulation. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32: 492-498.
• 39 Meijer P, Haverkate F. An external quality assessment programme for von Willebrand Factor laboratory analysis. An overview from the European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Foundation. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32: 485-491.
• 40 Favaloro EJ. Laboratory monitoring of therapy in von Willebrand Disease: Efficacy of the PFA-100® and VWF:CB as coupled strategies. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 6: 566-576.