Vitamin K Antagonists Compared to Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins for Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: An Observational Study in Routine Clinical Practice

Abstract

Since several trials have demonstrated that low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) is superior to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer-associated VTE, guidelines now recommend LMWH monotherapy in this setting. We evaluated whether this shift resulted in improved outcomes in routine clinical practice. We performed a cohort study of consecutive patients with cancer-associated VTE during 2001 and 2010. We compared the risks for recurrent VTE, major bleeding and mortality between patients diagnosed before and after 2008 during a 6-month routine follow-up. A total of 381 patients were included, of which 234 (61.4%) were diagnosed before 2008. Before 2008, 23% of the patients were treated with LMWH; thereafter, this percentage was higher: 67%. The 6-month incidence for recurrent VTE was 8.6% in patients diagnosed before 2008 versus 7.5% for patients diagnosed after 2008 (risk difference [RD]: −1.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −6.3, 5.3). The respective risks for major bleeding were 6.4 versus 4.8% (RD: −1.6%; 95% CI: −3.8 to 5.8), and 39.7 versus 41.5% (RD: 1.8%; 95% CI: −8.8, 12) for overall mortality. The mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) of patients treated with VKA was 61%. Despite a clear shift toward LMWH as agent of choice for cancer-associated VTE, we did not observe a clear improvement in terms of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications.

Keywords

venous thromboembolism - cancer - low-molecular-weight heparin - vitamin K antagonist - recurrent thrombosis

• References

• 1 Kovac Z, Kovac M, Mitic G, Antonijevic N. The oncology treatment of patients who use oral anticoagulants is connected with high risk of bleeding complications. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2010; 30 (02) 210-214
• 2 Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Piccioli A. , et al. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood 2002; 100 (10) 3484-3488
• 3 Trujillo-Santos J, Nieto JA, Ruíz-Gamietea A. , et al; RIETE Investigators. Bleeding complications associated with anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer. Thromb Res 2010; 125 (Suppl. 02) S58-S61
• 4 Deitcher SR, Kessler CM, Merli G, Rigas JR, Lyons RM, Fareed J. ; ONCENOX Investigators. Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events in patients with active cancer: enoxaparin alone versus initial enoxaparin followed by warfarin for a 180-day period. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2006; 12 (04) 389-396
• 5 Hull RD, Pineo GF, Brant RF. , et al; LITE Trial Investigators. Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin versus usual care in proximal-vein thrombosis patients with cancer. Am J Med 2006; 119 (12) 1062-1072
• 6 Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI. , et al; Randomized Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin versus Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer (CLOT) Investigators. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (02) 146-153
• 7 Meyer G, Marjanovic Z, Valcke J. , et al. Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a randomized controlled study. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162 (15) 1729-1735
• 8 Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J. , et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2016; 149 (02) 315-352
• 9 Lee AY. Anticoagulation in the treatment of established venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (29) 4895-4901
• 10 Monreal M, Trujillo-Santos J. Lessons from VTE registries: the RIETE experience. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2009; 22 (01) 25-33
• 11 Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJ, Briët E. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost 1993; 69 (03) 236-239
• 12 Koopman MM, Prandoni P, Piovella F. , et al; The Tasman Study Group. Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. N Engl J Med 1996; 334 (11) 682-687
• 13 Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Bernardi E, Villalta S, Bagatella P, Girolami A. ; DERECUS Investigators Group. The diagnostic value of compression ultrasonography in patients with suspected recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2002; 88 (03) 402-406
• 14 Suissa S. Immortal time bias in pharmaco-epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 167 (04) 492-499
• 15 Lee AY, Kamphuisen PW, Meyer G. , et al; CATCH Investigators. Tinzaparin vs warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 314 (07) 677-686
• 16 Louzada ML, Majeed H, Dao V, Wells PS. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism according to malignancy characteristics in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis: a systematic review of observational and intervention studies. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2011; 22 (02) 86-91
• 17 Louzada ML, Carrier M, Lazo-Langner A. , et al. Development of a clinical prediction rule for risk stratification of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2012; 126 (04) 448-454