Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2008; 21(3): 213-219
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1081000
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Anal Fistula and Anorectal Sepsis

Myles Joyce1 , Joseph C. Veniero2 , Ravi Pokala Kiran1
  • 1Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 2Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 July 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

Complex perianal disease may be extremely debilitating for the patient with significant impingement on quality of life. The accurate identification of anatomical areas of involvement and subsequent appropriate management is crucial to achieving a successful outcome when treating anorectal sepsis and anal fistulae. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a powerful tool in the evaluation of anal anatomy. In patients with complex disease MRI is an important adjunct in delineating disease location and extent, its relationship to sphincter muscles, and in planning management. MRI also plays an important role in evaluating the response to medical and surgical therapies.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Buchanan G N, Halligan S, Williams A B et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging for primary fistula-in-ano.  Br J Surg. 2003;  90 877-881
  • 2 Schaefer O, Lohrmann C, Langer M. Assessment of anal fistulas with high-resolution subtraction MR-fistulography: comparison with surgical findings.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;  19 91-98
  • 3 Spencer J A, Chapple K, Wilson D, Ward J, Windsor A C, Ambrose N S. Outcome after surgery for perianal fistula: predictive value of MR imaging.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;  171 403-406
  • 4 Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano.  Radiology. 2006;  239 18-33
  • 5 Berman L, Israel G M, McCarthy S M, Weinreb J C, Longo W E. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in anorectal disease.  World J Gastroenterol. 2007;  13 3153-3158
  • 6 Chapple K S, Spencer J A, Windsor A C, Wilson D, Ward J, Ambrose N S. Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of fistula-in-ano.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 511-516
  • 7 Parks A G, Gordon P H, Hardcastle J D. A classification of fistula-in-ano.  Br J Surg. 1976;  63 1-12
  • 8 Bartram C, Buchanan G. Imaging anal fistula.  Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;  41 443-457
  • 9 Zbar A P, deSouza N M, Puni R, Kmiot W A. Comparison of endoanal magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings in perirectal sepsis.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 111-114
  • 10 Haggett P J, Moore N R, Shearman J D, Travis S P, Jewell D P, Mortensen N J. Pelvic and perineal complications of Crohn's disease: assessment using magnetic resonance imaging.  Gut. 1995;  36 407-410
  • 11 Dwarkasing S, Hussain S M, Krestin G P. Magnetic resonance imaging of perianal fistulas.  Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005;  26 247-258
  • 12 Morris J, Spencer J A, Ambrose N S. MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management.  Radiographics. 2000;  20 623-637
  • 13 Hull T. Rectovaginal fistula. In: Fazio V, Church J, Delaney C Current Therapy in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia; Elsevier, Mosby 2005: 35-40
  • 14 Stoker J, Rociu E, Schouten W R, Lameris J S. Anovaginal and rectovaginal fistulas: endoluminal sonography versus endoluminal MR imaging.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;  178 737-741
  • 15 Dwarkasing S, Hussain S M, Hop W C, Krestin G P. Anovaginal fistulas: evaluation with endoanal MR imaging.  Radiology. 2004;  231 123-128
  • 16 Van Assche G, Vanbeckevoort D, Bielen D et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of infliximab on perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 332-339
  • 17 Buchanan G N, Sibbons P, Osborn M et al.. Pilot study: fibrin sealant in anal fistula model.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 532-539
  • 18 Buchanan G N, Bartram C I, Phillips R K et al.. Efficacy of fibrin sealant in the management of complex anal fistula: a prospective trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1167-1174
  • 19 Kuijpers H C, Schulpen T. Fistulography for fistula-in-ano. Is it useful?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 103-104
  • 20 Poen A C, Felt-Bersma R J, Eijsbouts Q A, Cuesta M A, Meuwissen S G. Hydrogen peroxide-enhanced transanal ultrasound in the assessment of fistula-in-ano.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 1147-1152
  • 21 Halligan S, Buchanan G. MR imaging of fistula-in-ano.  Eur J Radiol. 2003;  47 98-107
  • 22 Maier A G, Funovics M A, Kreuzer S H et al.. Evaluation of perianal sepsis: Comparison of anal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;  14 254-260
  • 23 Hussain S M, Stoker J, Schouten W R, Hop W C, Lameris J S. Fistula in ano: endoanal sonography versus endoanal MR imaging in classification.  Radiology. 1996;  200 475-481
  • 24 Lunniss P J, Barker P G, Sultan A H et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;  37 708-718
  • 25 Buchanan G N, Halligan S, Taylor S et al.. MRI of fistula-in-ano: inter- and intraobserver agreement and effects of directed education.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  183 135-140

Ravi Pokala KiranM.D. 

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation

9500 Euclid Ave./A30, Cleveland, OH 44195

Email: kiranp@ccf.org

    >